>
> Yes, that would be cleaner.
patch for not only the i810 but also the fixes for radoen/r128/mga
drivers, along with the changes to xf86drm.[ch] ...
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/patches/dri/agp_drm.diff
I think XFree86 tree is going to need something along these lines also,
but I don't have
I was just wondering how the new DMA code Jose was working on for the
mach64 driver is going. Does it look like it will be ready to
commit/test soon? Are you too busy and need someone to pick it up and
finish it off? I've got some spare time I could lend ;-)
-James
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
Dave Airlie wrote:
I'd lean towards using ~0 as the error value and keeping the existing
types, etc.
potential patch at:
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/patches/dri/i810_drm_agp.diff
I wonder if we should change the drmAgpAlloc function to set the handle to
DRM_AGP_NO_HANDLE?
Yes, that would be cle
> I'd lean towards using ~0 as the error value and keeping the existing
> types, etc.
>
potential patch at:
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/patches/dri/i810_drm_agp.diff
I wonder if we should change the drmAgpAlloc function to set the handle to
DRM_AGP_NO_HANDLE?
Other drivers will need some fixi
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla
bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched
in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at th
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 22:23, Andreas Stenglein wrote:
> Am 2003.07.06 06:03:54 +0200 schrieb(en) Ian Romanick:
> > Andreas Stenglein wrote:
> > > how to enable Mesa Verbose Debugging in the DRI-tree?
> > >
> > > http://mesa3d.org/debugging.html didnt help much
> >
> > It depends on the driver.
Dave Airlie wrote:
and of course
d) revert back to using memory->memory, requires whoever switched us to
key to explain :-)
Okay this was done by David Dawes back in April, and was taken from the
XFree trunk, it looks like it is needed. so one of the other three
approaches is needed...
I'd lean t
Jens Owen wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
The real difference comes at the unlock. When a thread wants to release
the futex, it increments the variable. If the value is greater than
zero, the thread happily continues on. If the value is zero or
negative, the thread calls into the kernel to wake-up t
12 matches
Mail list logo
