[Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-11-07 Thread Garry Reisky
I just wanted to say that the mesa 4.1 branch is looking quite nice. The visuals for Wolfenstein and others looks very nice on the r200. One thing that sems to effect most games that I've tried is that when you change resolution or hit alt enter it seems to turn everything this green color and I

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 09:04, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Anyway, back to the point of my patch: even in the context of the > > XFree86 tree, does it make sense only to build these libraries when all > > libraries are built, even if the

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:26:40PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:56, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the > > > attached patch? > > > > Actually if they're not built, I think we should ditch t

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:16:49AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:04:41PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Don, 2002-11-07 at 17:38, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:32:03PM +000

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2002-11-07 at 18:04, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Don, 2002-11-07 at 17:38, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:32:03PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > >On Don, 2002-11-07 a

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Ian Romanick
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:04:41PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Don, 2002-11-07 at 17:38, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:32:03PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > >On Don,

Re: [Dri-devel] Glaxium...

2002-11-07 Thread Ian Romanick
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:48:55AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:41:00PM +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 6. November 2002 23:23 schrieb Adam K Kirchhoff: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > These two links show screenshots of glaxium on two separate > > > machines,

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Don, 2002-11-07 at 17:38, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:32:03PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > >On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:56, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > > > > >>Michel Dänzer

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2002-11-07 at 17:38, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:32:03PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > >On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:56, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > > >>Michel Dänzer wrote: > > >> > > >>>These no longer get built by default. Any objections a

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:32:03PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > >On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:56, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > >>Michel Dänzer wrote: > >> > >>>These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the > >>>attached patch? > >>> > >>Actually if they're not

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI w/o GL

2002-11-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
I think your really confused on how things fit together. I'd be really hard pushed to see how a multithreaded application is causing the 2D driver to fail. It's more likely that the 2D driver has problems anyway and the multithreaded app is triggering this. The DRI won't help you at all for this.

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Keith Whitwell
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:56, Keith Whitwell wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the attached patch? Actually if they're not built, I think we should ditch them from cvs. We're not working on them. In that case I'd

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:56, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the > > attached patch? > > Actually if they're not built, I think we should ditch them from cvs. We're > not working on them. In that case I'd vote again f

[Dri-devel] DRI w/o GL

2002-11-07 Thread khellman
Hello all: I'm working on incorporating a Geode accelerated driver into a LC build. During the process, I've weaseled our X11 (4.2.1) build down a fair bit - in part by removing GL support. My final defect is that a multithreaded application displaying 4 distinct changing images in a quad scre

[Dri-devel] Differences between R100 & R200 for GL_PREVIOUS?

2002-11-07 Thread Ian Romanick
I've been going through the R100 driver in the texmem branch. I'm trying to make it more like the R200 driver. This should make it easier for me to make the texmem changes to the R200 driver and back-port features (npot textures & YCBCR textures) to the R100 driver. I've come across two differen

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:56:46PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > >These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the > >attached patch? > > Actually if they're not built, I think we should ditch them from cvs. > We're not working on them. Now that sound lik

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 08:37:57AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: > Alan Hourihane wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 08:17:06AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: > > > >>Alan Hourihane wrote: > >> > >>>On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > >>> > >>> > These no longer get built by de

Re: [Dri-devel] Glaxium...

2002-11-07 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:41:00PM +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 6. November 2002 23:23 schrieb Adam K Kirchhoff: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > These two links show screenshots of glaxium on two separate > > > machines, one with an r100 (o

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Keith Whitwell
Michel Dänzer wrote: These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the attached patch? Actually if they're not built, I think we should ditch them from cvs. We're not working on them. Keith --- This sf.net email is sponso

Re: [Dri-devel] Glaxium...

2002-11-07 Thread Ian Romanick
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:41:00PM +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 6. November 2002 23:23 schrieb Adam K Kirchhoff: > > Hello all, > > > > These two links show screenshots of glaxium on two separate > > machines, one with an r100 (original 64 Meg Radeon) and one with an r200 > > (Rad

Re: [Dri-devel] Glaxium...

2002-11-07 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Hello all, I tried the Lan-test (build 0197) of parsec. I noticed the odd texture problems both with TCL enabled and disabled on my 8500, so it doesn't look like TCL is the culprit. Adam On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-1] Nützel

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Brian Paul
Alan Hourihane wrote: On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 08:17:06AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: Alan Hourihane wrote: On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the attached patch? Is there any reason to ? Have we patched

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 08:17:06AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: > Alan Hourihane wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > >>These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the > >>attached patch? > > > > > >Is there any reason to ? Have we patched/chan

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:09:44PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:01, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the > > > attached patch? > > > > Is there any r

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Brian Paul
Alan Hourihane wrote: On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the attached patch? Is there any reason to ? Have we patched/changed these at all from the standard 4.2.0 base ? When I bring Mesa 5.0 into CVS I

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:01, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the > > attached patch? > > Is there any reason to ? Have we patched/changed these at all from > the standard 4.2.0 b

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the > attached patch? Is there any reason to ? Have we patched/changed these at all from the standard 4.2.0 base ? Alan.

[Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the attached patch? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast Index: config/cf/host.def ==

Re: [Dri-devel] S3TC any progress?

2002-11-07 Thread Ian Molton
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 01:40:15 +0100 Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No progress. I've pinged S3 every two weeks or so, but haven't > > received a reply since over a month ago. > > Sad, very sad... > > ...it seems to me that we do NOT get much ear at VIA/S3. > > I'll do not buy any p

[Dri-devel] Respond for Your FREE Euro

2002-11-07 Thread coin39j7487e02
On January 1st 2002, the European countries began using the new Euro. Never before have so many countries with such powerful economies united to use a single currency. Get your piece of history now! We would like to send you a FREE Euro and a FREE report on world currency. Just visit our si