Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > But I didn't get this with 2.4.19/2.4.20-preX plus DRI CVS DRM module. Hmm.. I'm looking at the diff beween DRI CVS and the kernel tree, and all of it is purely semantic or due to the workqueue stuff in 2.5.x (which is also the reason why DRI CVS d

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, David D. Hagood wrote: > > Is it at DRM 1.6.0 release? It's up-to-date wrt all the drivers in CVS, and yes, for radeon the current version is 1.6.0. >I was looking at running 2.5.x, since that > would seem to be a better "fit" to an SMP machine than 2.4.1

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 20:49 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > But maybe it is related to my 2.5.42-mm1 kernel. It do not include the > > latest DRI CVS DRM code and DRI CVS DRM do not compile with this kernel. > > Actually, you should be able to just us

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 21:09 schrieb David D. Hagood: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Actually, you should be able to just use the in-kernel DRM code, since it > > is actually up-to-date wrt the CVS tree apart from some minor MGA DMA > > updates and an added pci_enable_device() - which should be

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread David D. Hagood
Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Actually, you should be able to just use the in-kernel DRM code, since it > is actually up-to-date wrt the CVS tree apart from some minor MGA DMA > updates and an added pci_enable_device() - which should be a non-issue Is it at DRM 1.6.0 release? I was looking at runni

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > But maybe it is related to my 2.5.42-mm1 kernel. It do not include the latest > DRI CVS DRM code and DRI CVS DRM do not compile with this kernel. Actually, you should be able to just use the in-kernel DRM code, since it is actually up-to-date wrt

Re: [Dri-devel] gcc-3.2 bug workaround (was: gcc-3.2 problem and Makefile inconsistency)

2002-10-13 Thread Felix Kühling
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 09:34:17 +0100 José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felix, > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:47:18AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: > >More results: > > > >I get the same strange behaviour when I compile with -march=pentium2. I > >could narrow it down to lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/rad

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 18:47 schrieb David D. Hagood: > Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Not that I know. Help is very welcome. > > Which gfk do you own? ATI r100/r200? > > > > Then please do some "testing" with multiple OpenGL context on your > > system. There are some problems/bugs left. > > > > Re

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread David D. Hagood
Dieter Nützel wrote: Not that I know. Help is very welcome. Which gfk do you own? ATI r100/r200? Then please do some "testing" with multiple OpenGL context on your system. There are some problems/bugs left. Regards, Dieter I have an ATI 7500 DW, so I'd be glad to test. What sorts of tests

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 18:13 schrieb David D. Hagood: > Having recently upgraded to an SMP system, I was wondering if any of the > work done on PMesa was slated to be ported to the mainline DRI code - it > would be nice to allow applications to use both CPUs to do the setup work. Not that I

[Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread David D. Hagood
Having recently upgraded to an SMP system, I was wondering if any of the work done on PMesa was slated to be ported to the mainline DRI code - it would be nice to allow applications to use both CPUs to do the setup work. --- This sf.net email

[Dri-devel] radeon: quads rendered too small

2002-10-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
I've done some more clueless digging into the problem visible in http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/evas_test.jpeg and http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/celestia.jpeg . My first suspicion was an off-by-one error in the scissor code, but enlarging the scissor rectangle doesn't help; making it smal

Re: [Dri-devel] gcc-3.2 problem and Makefile inconsistency

2002-10-13 Thread Felix Kühling
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 09:34:17 +0100 José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felix, > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:47:18AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: > >More results: > > > >I get the same strange behaviour when I compile with -march=pentium2. I > >could narrow it down to lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/rad

[Dri-devel] Re: scoo

2002-10-13 Thread Cem Yucel
Title: ilkcwastaayurpnvfcyinejpixqigjvowistjlplnpgghuemyfxpkhfshvc MP3SA En Ýyi En Büyük Arþiv Türkçe MP3 Yabancý MP3 Türkçe Albümler Yabancý Albümler Pop Müzik Arabesk Müzik Rock Müzik Latin Müzik Hip-Hop Müzik Türk Sanat Müziði

Re: [Dri-devel] gcc-3.2 problem and Makefile inconsistency

2002-10-13 Thread José Fonseca
Felix, On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:47:18AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: More results: I get the same strange behaviour when I compile with -march=pentium2. I could narrow it down to lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_state.c. Then I split radeon_state.c and put only one non-static function at a tim

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach 64 and zsnes bug.

2002-10-13 Thread José Fonseca
Roswel, On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 10:55:09PM +0100, roswel wrote: Hi i'm using mach64 dri binary 20020916 and i've a problem with zsnes 1.36 build with openGL support. If i don't use DRI, and launch zsnes with openGL 640x480 display, all work fine, but very slowly. But if i use DRI, and laucnh zs