Hi all,
since we now have a new website and a new webmaster I will be
unsubscribing from dri-devel.
I would like to congratulate Liam on a job well done. At the same time I
would like to apologize for my lack of involvement until recently. Had I
gotten a little more involved from earlier on, the
Short form tonight 'cause I'm somewhat tired and angry about X server hang
during my tests so that I have to kill KMail (KDE 3.1 beta2) with my long
one...;-(
Kernel 2.5.40 (-mcp3/-ac3) did the trick.
No more stuttering during UT 436 (numbers to come).
Mesa/demos> ut&
[1] 10759
Mesa/demos> r2
> > But Q3A get best (~136 fps) only with "setenv R200_NO_USLEEPS 1".
>
> Stefan Lange reported that Quake3 gives him max 50FPS which sounds like
> a usleep limit. I saw that usleep is used in several places in
> r200_ioctl.c. I'm afraid that my change in r200Clear may be causing
> trouble.
>
>
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 03:50:38 +0200
Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 09:58 schrieb Keith Whitwell:
> > > I definitely running this on my dual Athlon with latest ACPI for 2.4.19
> > > and irq's routing enabled, I think.
> > >
> > > With "procinfo -f" I see ~980
Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 09:58 schrieb Keith Whitwell:
> > I definitely running this on my dual Athlon with latest ACPI for 2.4.19
> > and irq's routing enabled, I think.
> >
> > With "procinfo -f" I see ~980 irq/sec during "gears".
> >
> > Same with r200 code from yesterday. But it was much f
On Sam, 2002-10-05 at 00:42, Jay Phelps wrote:
> I tested this build with glxinfo and glxgears, both of which worked just
> fine. In fact, gears seemed to perform slightly faster than in previous
> releases.
>
> However, when I tried to us mplayer in Xv mode, my screen behaved like
> the vertica
On Sam, 2002-10-05 at 01:29, Chad Page wrote:
>
> I checked out latest CVS earlier and compiled it, it seems to work
> fine now.
Yes, I tracked this down together with Kevin Puetz. Glad to hear the fix
works for you as well.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (power
I checked out latest CVS earlier and compiled it, it seems to work
fine now.
- Chad
On 1 Oct 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 02:18, Chad Page wrote:
> >
> > Nope, dosen't work with that - I still have to comment out the
> > call in RADEONR
I tested this build with glxinfo and glxgears, both of which worked just
fine. In fact, gears seemed to perform slightly faster than in previous
releases.
However, when I tried to us mplayer in Xv mode, my screen behaved like
the vertical hold had gone crazy.
I'm on 2.4.19 using a Rage Mobility
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 07:53:22PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> One option is to have the kernel actually do the fixup of the buffers when
> they are submitted by the client, so the driver never knows really where it's
> textures are, but talks about them via. some indirection.
I've been loo
On Fre, 2002-10-04 at 10:03, Konstantin Lepikhov wrote:
>
> Friday 04, at 12:29:26 AM you wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > > Yes, of course. Seeking this found another problem - darkplaces after hard
> > > playing (intro demo) lockups X - program exited abnormally with
> > > drmRadeonIrqWait: -4 messag
On Fre, 2002-10-04 at 14:10, Stefan Lange wrote:
> [...snip...]
> >
> > This assuming, of course, that these snapshots are indeed the promised
> > holly graal. Please test.
> >
>
> seem to work fine for my system
> (i tried the r200-package, on debian unstable, gcc is 2.95.4 on my system)
> n
[...snip...]
>
> This assuming, of course, that these snapshots are indeed the promised
> holly graal. Please test.
>
seem to work fine for my system
(i tried the r200-package, on debian unstable, gcc is 2.95.4 on my system)
nice work
> José Fonseca
>
--
On Fre, 2002-10-04 at 10:59, Adam Duck wrote:
> > "Andy" == Andy Dustman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andy> Which is it, then: Snapshots or no snapshots? The current snapshots (for
> Andy> linux-i386) don't work unless you have Red Hat 8.0 and/or glibc-2.3; I'm
> Andy> not even
again.
Ok. I've just finished building a set of snapshots from the HEAD with
this chroot environment. They are available from the usual place with
a build tag of *-20021004-linux.i386.tar.bz2 .
As said before these snapshots were made in a chroot environment, based
on Gentoo Linux 1.2, with gcc-
> "Andy" == Andy Dustman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Which is it, then: Snapshots or no snapshots? The current snapshots (for
Andy> linux-i386) don't work unless you have Red Hat 8.0 and/or glibc-2.3; I'm
Andy> not even sure that they work on that platform. Broken snapshots
Hi Michel!
Friday 04, at 12:29:26 AM you wrote:
>
>
> > Yes, of course. Seeking this found another problem - darkplaces after hard
> > playing (intro demo) lockups X - program exited abnormally with
> > drmRadeonIrqWait: -4 message.
>
> -4 is -EINTR, i.e. the system call was interrupted by a
17 matches
Mail list logo
