On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> On Saturday 22 June 2002 16:15, Jens Owen wrote:
> > Zilvinas,
> >
> > Thanks for posting this data. It's nice to see confirmation of how
> > things were intended to work.
>
> I'll second that.
> May I ask if Zilvinas could repeat
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 08:15:30AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
> Zilvinas,
>
> Thanks for posting this data. It's nice to see confirmation of how
> things were intended to work.
>
No problem Jens :)) I am glad you have found those results usefull ;)
> -- /\
>
Am Sam, 2002-06-22 um 20.45 schrieb Jens Owen:
> Michael Schlueter wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> His first name is Brian :-)
Ups, sorry for that.
> > So I've to do some printf into os-support/linux/drm/xf86drm.c to find
> > that problem first (or is that a known issure?).
>
> Make sure your DRM driver
Ian Molton wrote:
>
> Hey.
>
> I want to get started putting up the new site, but no-one has told me
> how to access the webspace...
>
> I've given my sourceforge details and been added to the project...
Ian,
I can't help you with access details, but I'd like you to stage this
below the curre
Hey.
I want to get started putting up the new site, but no-one has told me
how to access the webspace...
I've given my sourceforge details and been added to the project...
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
_
Hi everybody!!
maybe this is not the right question for this list but ...
well here goes:
I was using the radeon driver wich came with this package
radeon-20020525-linux.i386.tar.bz2, it was working right ...
well not too much right, just 400FPS on glxgears when some
peple say they get 1000FPS an
Hoping I get a driver that works with my all-in-wonder 7500 card, I
downloaded
radeon-20020621-linux.i386.tar
but running ./install.sh exited with an error; dri.log is included
at the end of my message.
My system:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla)
# rpm -q XF
On Saturday 22 June 2002 21:41, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>If you're running XFree86 4.1,
> >
> > No, I'm running 4.2. Yesterday I bit the bullet and downloaded the
> > entire source tree (quite an adventure down a phone line ...) and
> > built from source. All worked fin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>If you're running XFree86 4.1,
>>
>
> No, I'm running 4.2. Yesterday I bit the bullet and downloaded the
> entire source tree (quite an adventure down a phone line ...) and
> built from source. All worked fine this time, so there perhaps some
> problem with the binary p
", 0666) = 0
> 1131 open("/dev/dri/card0", O_RDWR)= 6
> 1131 write(0, "drmOpenDevice: open result is 6,"..., 38) = 38
> 1131 ioctl(6, DEVFSDIOC_GET_PROTO_REV, 0x83d2ae8) = 0
> 1131 ioctl(6, DEVFSDIOC_GET_PROTO_REV, 0x83d2ae8) = 0
> 1131 --- SIGSEGV (Seg
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 22:19, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:24:21PM -0700, Bret Towe wrote:
> > i dont know if anyone else is getting this problem
> > but after exiting and loading x a couple times and using
> > gl once in a while when reloading x for the 3-5th time
> > som
Am Fre, 2002-06-21 um 22.37 schrieb Sergey V. Udaltsov:
> I recently asked the question about merging Mach64 DRI with Gatos
> project - and got no answer. So, now I am trying to use xine - and found
> that mach64 dri snapshots do not properly support XVideo extension (at
> least in YUV overlay a
> If you're running XFree86 4.1,
No, I'm running 4.2. Yesterday I bit the bullet and downloaded the
entire source tree (quite an adventure down a phone line ...) and
built from source. All worked fine this time, so there perhaps some
problem with the binary packages on SF? Perhaps there's a depen
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
I'm using the XFree 4.2 Debian packages for Brandon. A test with
mga-20020622-linux.i386.tar.bz2 from http://dri.sourceforge.net/ had the
same result as with the XServer from extras.tgz.
So I've to do some p
On Saturday 22 June 2002 16:15, Jens Owen wrote:
> Zilvinas,
>
> Thanks for posting this data. It's nice to see confirmation of how
> things were intended to work.
I'll second that.
May I ask if Zilvinas could repeat with 60Hz?
I know that this is a "bad number" but the RAMDAC clock has some inf
Hi Michel!
Saturday 22, at 02:48:06 PM you wrote:
>
> I was wondering how I managed to break it this time. :) But it works
> fine on the Athlon box at work.
>
> If you're running XFree86 4.1, Keith mentioned that the TCL stuff
> doesn't work with that. The TCL snapshots from TG contained a ha
Zilvinas,
Thanks for posting this data. It's nice to see confirmation of how
things were intended to work.
-- /\
Jens Owen/ \/\ _
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ \ \ Steamboat Springs, Colorado
---
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00D7_14C18B6A.B3286E66"
On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 17:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just upgraded to the latest radeon dri-cvs (using the binary packages
> on SF) and now the X server won't start. This used to work fine with
> the 20 May TCL snapshot.
>
> The kernel module seems to load OK:
>
> Jun 19 16:30:36 localhos
Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= writes:
> On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 18:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= writes:
> > ed, 2002-06-19 at 16:59, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >
> > 19 Jun 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 16:29, Malver
Hi,
I compiled yesterdays mach64-0-0-4 branch and did some tests with it.
I configured 1024x768 screen resolution in XF86Config-4 and 16 bit depth.
AGP Speed is 1 and DMA Buffers are 2 MB
My machine is a Sony Vaio with 128 MB RAM, a 650 MHz P3 and an Ati
Rage Mobility with 8 MB Ram.
I got about
21 matches
Mail list logo
