Title: abdyesilkart.com
Sayýn dri-devel ,
Amerika 'nýn her
sene yapmakta olduðu, sahiplerine devamlý oturma ve çalýþma izni saðlayan Green
Card çekiliþi için kayýtlarýmýz baþlamýþtýr.
Sizin de bildiðiniz
gibi Green Card sahipleri;
1.Amerika Birleþik
Devletleri'nde süresiz olarak (h
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.11 22:12 Leif Delgass wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > This is where we have to make sure that any assumptions we make can be
> > verified to be true. I haven't done enough testing to really determine
On 2002.06.11 22:12 Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> ...
>
> This is where we have to make sure that any assumptions we make can be
> verified to be true. I haven't done enough testing to really determine a
> sure fire way of knowing that the card won't stop ye
Turkiye-Cin Macini kazandigimiz zaman gumbur gumbur Tarkan - Milli Takim
Sarkisi'ni calmak istemezmisiniz ?
http://www.mp3data.org girin hemen yukleyin
2émh¥*'ej°¨z²'½éí¢¼÷y·²Ð.rبÄá®à.m4Úm§ÿðÃ(Á©ÚìZ׫r¿q©^Ö«¸z÷¥¨¥x%ËC®'^½éeËl²«qç讧zØm¶?þX¬¶Ë(º· ~àzwþX¬¶Ï
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 23:05, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 19:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>Jacek Popławski wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.11 20:31 Leif Delgass wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > > On 2002.06.11 18:24 Leif Delgass wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > In that case we just need to ensure that th
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 19:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>Jacek Popławski wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>>
>>>
Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has to be resolved before the
merge. Have you tried the tcl branch
On 2002.06.11 20:31 Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> > On 2002.06.11 18:24 Leif Delgass wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > In that case we just need to ensure that the head >= the offset of the
> > last ring submited.
>
> B
gested above, all the work done in
> > the
> > block where the engine is idle in UPDATE_RING_HEAD could be moved into
> > dma_start which could be made an inline function. At the moment, that's
> > the only place dma_start is called, right?
> >
>
> Yep. But after thinking better and it's probably better do all in
> UPDATE_RING... there isn't much point in putting 2 output instructions in
> a seperate function where the call overhead takes more instructions than
> that, especially if they are called only from a single function.
But doesn't inlining the function remove the overhead? I was suggesting
this mainly for readability, it's not really necessary if dma_start isn't
going to be used anywhere else.
I'm attaching a diff so you can see what I'm talking about. Hopefully
this will remove any confusion. :)
--
Leif Delgass
http://www.retinalburn.net
mach64-drm-20020611.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 18:15, Leif Delgass wrote:
> On 11 Jun 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 06:23, Leif Delgass wrote:
> > > If anyone has a log of today's IRC meeting, could you post it to the list
> > > or upload it to the DRI website? Thanks.
> >
> > Done.
>
> Thanks
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 19:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Jacek Popławski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has to be resolved before the
> >>merge. Have you tried the tcl branch with your card?
> >>
> >
> > I
On 2002.06.11 18:24 Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> > Leif,
> >
> > I've got it. After adding checks and checks to everything I finally
> > discovered it - in some circunstances (such as a regular wait_for_idle
> > with no previous buffer submiting as an example
Jacek Popławski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has to be resolved before the
>>merge. Have you tried the tcl branch with your card?
>>
>
> I don't have Radeon VE, but I know someone who has it (using radeon
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has to be resolved before the
> merge. Have you tried the tcl branch with your card?
I don't have Radeon VE, but I know someone who has it (using radeon binaries
from dri.sf.net downloads)
Jacek Popławski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>>Will the issues with non-TCL hardware be taken care of after the merge?
>>
>
> Is it possible that there will be any trouble with Radeon VE card (without T&L
> support) after merge?
Yes, it seems like th
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Will the issues with non-TCL hardware be taken care of after the merge?
Is it possible that there will be any trouble with Radeon VE card (without T&L
support) after merge?
__
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> Leif,
>
> I've got it. After adding checks and checks to everything I finally
> discovered it - in some circunstances (such as a regular wait_for_idle
> with no previous buffer submiting as an example) we were firing GUI master
> without enabling the
On 11 Jun 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 06:23, Leif Delgass wrote:
> > If anyone has a log of today's IRC meeting, could you post it to the list
> > or upload it to the DRI website? Thanks.
>
> Done.
Thanks.
> BTW it would be nice if you made your files group writable so
Leif,
I've got it. After adding checks and checks to everything I finally
discovered it - in some circunstances (such as a regular wait_for_idle
with no previous buffer submiting as an example) we were firing GUI master
without enabling the BM. It's a miracle the card even worked at all!
I'm
> Seriously, the DRI stuff does live in seperate directories,
> with the sole
> exception of the 2D driver, many of which have different
> maintainers in
> the XFree86 project scope. So there is a strong physical
> seperation of the
> DRI code in the XFree86 tree. So, more than the time that
I am trying to draw to two windows using one context.
It works for Mesa, but gives severe artifacts with DRI.
It would work to instead use glXCopyContext, but this
still doesn't work for DRI, and it crashes the server
with indirect rendering.
I am using ATI Rage and Radeon, with XFree86 CVS.
Have
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 12:26, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:17:18PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Then there's the render extension...
> >
> > That's one of the next items on my list. :)
>
> I wouldn't waste too much time on accelerating the RENDER extension
> just yet. T
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:17:18PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Then there's the render extension...
>
> That's one of the next items on my list. :)
I wouldn't waste too much time on accelerating the RENDER extension
just yet. Things are still changing, and then there's the lacking
of a test
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:28, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 23:39, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>On Fri, 31 May 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >>
> >>>Also note that it actually asks for the pixcache to be flushed *twice* - once
> >>>by RADEON_PURGE_CAC
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:19, Hanno Böck wrote:
> I have a Radeon Mobility M6 LY.
>
> AGP and DRM is detected correctly by the Kernel (2.4.18). I use XFree 4.2.0.
> Radeon Framebuffer works with a patch from James Mayer.
>
> Here are the important dmesg parts:
> radeonfb: ref_clk=2700, ref_div=60
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:56, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Although we still have a couple of bugs & a lockup on the tcl branch, the
> situation is in general better than what's on the trunk & I'd like to get that
> code merged now. This will also help get the 8500 branch started.
Will the issues wi
Although we still have a couple of bugs & a lockup on the tcl branch, the
situation is in general better than what's on the trunk & I'd like to get that
code merged now. This will also help get the 8500 branch started.
Anyone with any objections should speak up now.
Keith
__
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 23:39, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>>
>>On Fri, 31 May 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>
>>>Also note that it actually asks for the pixcache to be flushed *twice* - once
>>>by RADEON_PURGE_CACHE (which writes the RADEON_RB2D_DSTCACHE_CTLSTAT via the
>>>ring)
I have a Radeon Mobility M6 LY.
AGP and DRM is detected correctly by the Kernel (2.4.18). I use XFree 4.2.0.
Radeon Framebuffer works with a patch from James Mayer.
Here are the important dmesg parts:
radeonfb: ref_clk=2700, ref_div=60, xclk=16600 from BIOS
radeonfb: panel ID string: 1024x768
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 06:23, Leif Delgass wrote:
> If anyone has a log of today's IRC meeting, could you post it to the list
> or upload it to the DRI website? Thanks.
Done.
BTW it would be nice if you made your files group writable so other
project members could modify them if necessary.
--
30 matches
Mail list logo
