On 30 May 2002 00:25:08 +0100
"Sergey V. Udaltsov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again and again I take snapshots, again "Permission denied" even for
> root. What could this be? Can it be related to gcc 3.1 I use to build
> the kernel module in the snapshot? Really strange situation to me...
>
>
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:10:14AM +0100, Michael wrote:
> Now X c r a w l s at this point, but switching back to q3 you can play
> quake, frame rates seem fine, with just the chattering of continual
> *Error* out of fifo messages being written until you quit the game.
One other thing that's prob
Hi!
I have built the latest 2.4.18 stable several times. But when I try to
include the SIS DRM 4.1 drivers as a module, I get:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.18/kernel/drivers/char/drm/sis.o
depmod: sis_free
depmod: sis_malloc
make: *** [_modinst_post] Error
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:10:14AM +0100, Michael wrote:
> I'd just set supposedly 28mb of ring buffer too.
^^^ Doh, I'm being dumb, ignore this line...different thing altogether...
--
Michael.
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS App
Felix and Frank, many thanks for the information!
I will disable
CONFIG_DRM_SIS=y
for now.
CN
You too can have your own email address from Eurosport.
http://www.eurosport.com
___
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:10:48AM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> Hmmm. The following may be useful information:
>
> I've added some traces to read the free space in the FIFO each time
> COMMIT_RING() happens, and also in radeon_do_wait_for_fifo() to trace out
> the min/max number of FIFO slots it f
On 2002.05.30 01:13 Leif Delgass wrote:
> Jose,
>
> It's taking me a little longer than expected to finish the changes I
> mentioned. I'm trying to set this up so that it will be possible to test
> emitting buffers to the ring as they come in, but keep the original code
> in place, while sharing
way or it will go idle again. You need to
allow a resonable amount of buffers to queue up on the card before
restarting it.
--
Leif Delgass
http://www.retinalburn.net
mach64-20020529.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 11:26 am, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:"
> Tim Smith wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 May 2002 1:13 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:"
> >
> >>Tim Smith wrote:
> >>>On Tuesday 28 May 2002 8:40 am, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:"
> >>>
> Tim Smith wrote:
> >I'
Again and again I take snapshots, again "Permission denied" even for
root. What could this be? Can it be related to gcc 3.1 I use to build
the kernel module in the snapshot? Really strange situation to me...
Regards,
Sergey
___
Don't
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 02:54 pm, Felix Kühling wrote:
> I had an SIS 6326 one or two years ago and tried to make it work with
> XFree 4.0.2, I think. I figured out that the SIS DRM needs the SIS
> framebuffer driver. However, it does not work with SIS 6326 (at least it
> didn't use to). My conc
Hi,
I had an SIS 6326 one or two years ago and tried to make it work with
XFree 4.0.2, I think. I figured out that the SIS DRM needs the SIS
framebuffer driver. However, it does not work with SIS 6326 (at least it
didn't use to). My conclusion from this is that the SIS DRM does not
work with the
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:16:36AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:45:44AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
>
> > Ian, if you run 'xprop -root | grep SERVER_OVERLAY_VISUALS' is anything
> > found?
>
> Nothing. I'll have to check that the person that originally hit this is
> runn
Applied, compiled, installed. No change, except that there seems to be
even more distortion.
If I comment these two lines out in XF86Config
Load "dri"
Load "glx"
I can run X normally in 2d mode, but, of course, with no DRI. I have
double checked all the libraries to be of the correct version, a
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:45:44AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Ian, if you run 'xprop -root | grep SERVER_OVERLAY_VISUALS' is anything
> found?
Nothing. I'll have to check that the person that originally hit this is
running the same versions that I am.
--
Tell that to the Marines!
___
Karl Rasche wrote:
> Well, *something* blits now. It appears that if drawing to the front
> buffer, and only blitting one line, that things sort of work... A line of
> the correct color comes out, albet in the wrong location.
>
> Moving to multiple lines causes the nice colored line to disappear,
Well, *something* blits now. It appears that if drawing to the front
buffer, and only blitting one line, that things sort of work... A line of
the correct color comes out, albet in the wrong location.
Moving to multiple lines causes the nice colored line to disappear,
replaced with lines of garb
I am sorry! The parameter causing me trouble is:
CONFIG_DRM_SIS=y
Regards,
CN
=
Kernel having problem when compiling: 2.4.17.
glibc 2.1.2
gcc 2.95.3
hardware=AMD K6 II 450 MHz, SIS 6326 Display (VGA)
card supporting AGP 2x & PCI 2.1.
When
CONFIG_DRM_SIS=y
then
"make bzImage"
abort
Hi!
Kernel having problem when compiling: 2.4.17.
glibc 2.1.2
gcc 2.95.3
hardware=AMD K6 II 450 MHz, SIS 6326 Display (VGA)
card supporting AGP 2x & PCI 2.1.
When
CONFIG_DRM=y
then
"make bzImage"
aborts with the following message.
Regards,
CN
===
make[4]: Entering directory
`/usr/s
On 2002.05.24 21:46 José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.05.24 21:00 J5 wrote:
>> ...
>
>> > > May 24 21:13:07 lain kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7.
>> > > May 24 21:13:15 lain modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
>> > > char-major-81
>> > > May 24 21:13:57 lain kernel: agpgart: AGP mode is 0x
Tim Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 May 2002 1:13 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:"
>
>>Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>>On Tuesday 28 May 2002 8:40 am, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:"
>>>
>>>
Tim Smith wrote:
>I've done some more digging and it would appear to send an enormous
>amo
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 1:13 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:"
> Tim Smith wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 May 2002 8:40 am, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:"
> >
> >>Tim Smith wrote:
> >>>I've done some more digging and it would appear to send an enormous
> >>>amount of commands via radeon_cp_cmd
Jens
> Please not that Jose is talking about the Mach64 driver specifically, on
> this bullet item.
Thanks I realize this - this is exactly what I am interested in.:)
Sergey
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's
Michael wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 08:43:44PM -0400, Al Tobey wrote:
>
>>Same thing with a UP kernel ...
>>Yes, the kernel module was built fresh from the CVS tree.
>>
>>Should this not be happening?
>>
>
> No, subject to bugs / or the possiblity that everything's not in place.
>
> My gue
24 matches
Mail list logo
