Ian Romanick wrote:
> each part (DRM and 2D X driver) have to
> magically detect what the other part is capable of doing, and magically do
> the right thing.
>
> Here are the possible version combinations:
>
> 1. New DRM + new 2D X driver
> 2. Old DRM + new 2D X driver
> 3. New DRM + old 2D X d
On 2002.02.27 03:38 Darryl Cording wrote:
> G'Day,
>
> I have been playing around with the mach64 driver and was wondering if
> the driver will
> work in an X4.2 tree? or are the differences between the versions to
> great and will require
> specific porting of the mach64 code??
>
> regards
G'Day,
I have been playing around with the mach64 driver and was wondering if
the driver will
work in an X4.2 tree? or are the differences between the versions to
great and will require
specific porting of the mach64 code??
regards
Darryl
___
Dri
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> > > > > > GATOS Radeon driver has the proper handling of memory controller.
> > > > > > Consequently, usual drm modules will not work - you need to use drm-kernel
> > > > > > package availabl
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > > > > GATOS Radeon driver has the proper handling of memory controller.
> > > > > Consequently, usual drm modules will not work - you need to use drm-kernel
> > > > > package available at http://gatos.sf.net/
> > > > Is there any reason the dri
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 15:43:40
---
:: You wont believe what one of our reporters filmed Britney Spears Doing Backstage
:with her
I've been watching this thread for awhile now, and I think it's time for me
to inject my $0.02 worth. First, let me make sure that I've got things
straight here.
Changes have been made to the 2D X driver to support video capture on Radeon
cards. To support this change, the way that video memory
On 31 Jan 2002, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> In order to be accepted into the project however, you need to
>> ...
>>
>
>(Thanks for your explanation about NDA and steps to be a XFree86
>developer but I already had that understanding.)
Sorry, I wasn't implying that you didn't fully understand it..
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> > As for Linus not wanting to accept it, 2.4 has dropped most nat filters
> > except for ftp and most of them aren't back yet. So I don't buy this
> > argument.
>
> Vladimir,
>
> This is no joke. We absolutely need compatabi
[ton of recipients removed]
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> > > > GATOS Radeon driver has the proper handling of memory controller.
> > > > Consequently, usual drm modules will not work - you need to use drm-kernel
> > > >
On 31 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2002-01-30 at 15:56, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> > > http://gatos.sf.net/ - they were there last time I submitted a patch.. but
> > > it did not get in. Just to make sure I am
On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 17:24, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2002, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> >...
> >
> >In the comments Mike makes strong reference to join as XFree86 developer
> >as a mean to obtain NDA documentation that is shared to all XFree86
> >developers, but it was mentioned in the last
On 30 Jan 2002, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>Date: 30 Jan 2002 17:24:49 +
>From: Jose Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain
>List-Id:
>Subject: XFree86 NDA documentation
>
>I've decided to add some pertinent comments from Mike Harris regardin
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > > GATOS Radeon driver has the proper handling of memory controller.
> > > Consequently, usual drm modules will not work - you need to use drm-kernel
> > > package available at http://gatos.sf.net/
> > Is there any reason the drivers can't be me
Yeah the iDCT/MC stuff was what I was talking about.
Have they released the specs for this part of the
chips to developers so that an open source version may
be possible at some point?
Thanks for the information,
Alex
--- Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
>
> > Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> > > Also, I can make drm driver work nice with older 2d drivers - as soon as
> > > someone will show me a way to tell the version of the 2d driver that is
> > > accessing the drm driver.
> >
On Don, 2002-01-31 at 00:46, Frank Worsley wrote:
> It would also be nice if the IRC meeting logs were available on the
> website. The easiest way would probably be to add a new FAQ section for
> that and add every new log as as question titled "IRC Log from ".
Sounds good, have you seen the log
Frank,
On 2002.01.30 23:46 Frank Worsley wrote:
> Ok, I will just put a link from the Documentation page to your website.
> That way you can just update the docs on your end. Is that ok?
>
Yes, it's fine.
> It would also be nice if the IRC meeting logs were available on the
> website. The easi
Shawn,
On 2002.01.31 04:33 Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> I dont know if this is coming, or if there's any interest. But X just
> *dies* using the CPU to redraw 2D and 3D just isn't even worth using on
> this P200.
>
> I have a Mach64 chipset:
>
> ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (r
On Mit, 2002-01-30 at 15:56, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> > http://gatos.sf.net/ - they were there last time I submitted a patch.. but
> > it did not get in. Just to make sure I am not pulling your leg.. Yep, they
> > are there: search for R12
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Gareth Hughes wrote:
>
> > > Gareth, the current driver is broken. If someone wants to use video
> > > capture they _need_ both GATOS 2d driver and GATOS drm driver, period.
> > >
> > > What's so wrong about upgrading ?
> >
> > Guaranteed, someo
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Gareth Hughes wrote:
>
> > > The assumption was only made for experimental GATOS drivers. It is a
> > > practical one. More people come and ask: "I upgraded to GATOS driver and
> > > DRI won't work anymore !" Answer: RTFM, upgrade drm driver.
>
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> Also, I can make drm driver work nice with older 2d drivers - as soon as
> someone will show me a way to tell the version of the 2d driver that is
> accessing the drm driver.
How about using a new set of IOCTL numbers for the new interface--then
you'll know whether yo
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Jens Owen wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> > Also, I can make drm driver work nice with older 2d drivers - as soon as
> > someone will show me a way to tell the version of the 2d driver that is
> > accessing the drm driver.
>
> How about using a new set of IOCTL numbe
24 matches
Mail list logo
