GNOME 1.4.x still, but running TuxRacer totally blew up X/system. I
compared this to win2k and it just blew it out of the water HARD :(
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> >
> > I dont know if this is coming, or if there's any interes
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:27:49PM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
| This is no joke. We absolutely need compatability. Large amounts of
| developer pain don't even begin to compare to the enormous number of
| headaches incompatability causes our users.
Not to mention that Linus will almost certainly t
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> I dont know if this is coming, or if there's any interest. But X just
> *dies* using the CPU to redraw 2D and 3D just isn't even worth using on
> this P200.
>
> I have a Mach64 chipset:
>
> ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 41)
I dont know if this is coming, or if there's any interest. But X just
*dies* using the CPU to redraw 2D and 3D just isn't even worth using on
this P200.
I have a Mach64 chipset:
ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 41) 2MB
There is no DRI support for this card (at the momen
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> As for Linus not wanting to accept it, 2.4 has dropped most nat filters
> except for ftp and most of them aren't back yet. So I don't buy this
> argument.
Vladimir,
This is no joke. We absolutely need compatability. Large amounts of
developer pain don't even begin
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> > Gareth, the current driver is broken. If someone wants to use video
> > capture they _need_ both GATOS 2d driver and GATOS drm driver, period.
> >
> > What's so wrong about upgrading ?
>
> Guaranteed, someone will get a mismatch -- your changes may
Ok, I will just put a link from the Documentation page to your website.
That way you can just update the docs on your end. Is that ok?
It would also be nice if the IRC meeting logs were available on the
website. The easiest way would probably be to add a new FAQ section for
that and add every new
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> > Does anyone have any news on support for iDCT and
> > Motion-Compensation or any of the video related
> > features of the radeons? Do the reference drivers
> > from ATi have anything for these features? Just
> > curious.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
iDCT and MC is not support. Tv-in and YUV->RGB overlay and scaling are.
See http://gatos.sf.net/
Vladimir Dergachev
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Does anyone have any news on support for iDCT and
> Motion-Compensation or any of the video related
> features
> Gareth, the current driver is broken. If someone wants to use video
> capture they _need_ both GATOS 2d driver and GATOS drm driver, period.
>
> What's so wrong about upgrading ?
Guaranteed, someone will get a mismatch -- your changes may go back
into the stock kernel, breaking DRI CVS or what
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> > The assumption was only made for experimental GATOS drivers. It is a
> > practical one. More people come and ask: "I upgraded to GATOS driver and
> > DRI won't work anymore !" Answer: RTFM, upgrade drm driver.
>
> It's already been determined that:
> The assumption was only made for experimental GATOS drivers. It is a
> practical one. More people come and ask: "I upgraded to GATOS driver and
> DRI won't work anymore !" Answer: RTFM, upgrade drm driver.
It's already been determined that:
"I just upgraded my kernel, and DRI won't work anymor
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:15:53PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > > > I completely agree with you.. but I did not give you details :))
> > > >
> > > > What h
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:05:42PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > > > Regardless of the way it is merged the driver major version will need to
> > > > be bum
On 30 Jan 2002, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> I've decided to add some pertinent comments from Mike Harris regarding
> the availability of documentation under NDA to the DRI Devel FAQ (
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/faq/html/hardware.html#ATI-SPECS )
>
> In the comments Mike makes strong re
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:15:53PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > > I completely agree with you.. but I did not give you details :))
> > >
> > > What happens is that if you try to use older drm driver with GATOS
Daryll Strauss wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:15:53PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > I completely agree with you.. but I did not give you details :))
> >
> > What happens is that if you try to use older drm driver with GATOS 2d
> > driver the GATOS driver will notice and complain. Bu
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:05:42PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > > Regardless of the way it is merged the driver major version will need to
> > > be bumped. GATOS drivers does this but only minor - as I did not
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:15:53PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > I completely agree with you.. but I did not give you details :))
> >
> > What happens is that if you try to use older drm driver with GATOS 2d
> > driver the GATOS driver will no
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:15:53PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> I completely agree with you.. but I did not give you details :))
>
> What happens is that if you try to use older drm driver with GATOS 2d
> driver the GATOS driver will notice and complain. But if you use GATOS drm
> driver wi
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:05:42PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > Regardless of the way it is merged the driver major version will need to
> > be bumped. GATOS drivers does this but only minor - as I did not want to
> > upload a mesa radeon dri
Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
>
>>
>>Come on Vladimir, I'm not green. :-P
>>
>
> My bad,.. correct code turned out not to work.. Especially if you commit
> without testing (I had 8500DV board in).
>
You're fogiven, this time...
> Could you please try again ?
>
> Vl
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:05:42PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> Regardless of the way it is merged the driver major version will need to
> be bumped. GATOS drivers does this but only minor - as I did not want to
> upload a mesa radeon driver just because of the version change.
I'm afraid I
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 11:14, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> My bad,.. correct code turned out not to work.. Especially if you commit
> without testing (I had 8500DV board in).
>
> Could you please try again ?
That seams to have fixed it.
--
Morgan Collins http://sirmorcant.morcant.org
Crypto D
Perhaps someone should just ask them politely to release their docs to
XFree86 project as a whole. They were certainly doing that before and, if
anything, they were much more cooperative w.r.t. documentation lately.
I could certainly do it,.. but perhaps someone more "official".
> >
>
>
> Come on Vladimir, I'm not green. :-P
My bad,.. correct code turned out not to work.. Especially if you commit
without testing (I had 8500DV board in).
Could you please try again ?
Vladimir Dergachev
>
> I even checked out a fresh CVS copy of ati.2 and
> drm-ke
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
> > >
> > > > <__snipped_>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > I've implemented this (easier than software CCE) scheme. If you want to
> > > >
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote:
>
>
> Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
>
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
> >>
> >>
> >>><__snipped_>
> >>>
> >>>I've implemented this (easier than software CCE) scheme. If you want to
> >>>please try the lates
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote:
>
>
> Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
>
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
> >>
> >>
> >>><__snipped_>
> >>>
> >>>I've implemented this (easier than software CCE) scheme. If you want to
> >>>please try the lates
I've decided to add some pertinent comments from Mike Harris regarding
the availability of documentation under NDA to the DRI Devel FAQ (
http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/faq/html/hardware.html#ATI-SPECS )
In the comments Mike makes strong reference to join as XFree86 developer
as a mean
Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> Or is all together merged into the trunk?
I'm not sure if David's finished merging XFree86 4.2 into the DRI trunk
or not.
When he's done with that, we'll probably merge the DRI trunk into the
DRI mesa_4_0_branch. Then, when the branch is in good shape, merge it
back in
Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
>>
>>
>>><__snipped_>
>>>
>>>I've implemented this (easier than software CCE) scheme. If you want to
>>>please try the latest ati.2 CVS code at http://gatos.sf.net - or just take
>>>a lo
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
> >
> > > <__snipped_>
> > >>
> > >
> > > I've implemented this (easier than software CCE) scheme. If you want to
> > > please try the latest ati.2 CVS code at http://gatos.sf.net - or just
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Bill Currie wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:46:32PM -0800, Jim Carter wrote:
> > However, when the current user did not have permission to write on card0
> > (due to mode 0660 group video, the default provided by SuSE SaX2)
>
> Wouldn't it be better to add the user to grou
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote:
>
>
> Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
>
> > <__snipped_>
> >>
> >
> > I've implemented this (easier than software CCE) scheme. If you want to
> > please try the latest ati.2 CVS code at http://gatos.sf.net - or just take
> > a look at it.
> >
> > Basically I put i
Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
> <__snipped_>
>>
>
> I've implemented this (easier than software CCE) scheme. If you want to
> please try the latest ati.2 CVS code at http://gatos.sf.net - or just take
> a look at it.
>
> Basically I put in info->accel->Sync(pScrn) at entrance points into Xv
>
> Does anyone have any news on support for iDCT and
> Motion-Compensation or any of the video related
> features of the radeons? Do the reference drivers
> from ATi have anything for these features? Just
> curious.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
So far i do know, there should be a solution for your
pro
Does anyone have any news on support for iDCT and
Motion-Compensation or any of the video related
features of the radeons? Do the reference drivers
from ATi have anything for these features? Just
curious.
Thanks,
Alex
---
Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 14:17, J
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
>
> On 30 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 15:30, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 28 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 10:00, Vladimir Dergachev w
On 30 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2002-01-30 at 10:32, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> > On 30 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > > > Btw, while I've been sleeping I thought how we could get CCE support into
> > > > Xvideo. The thing I am really agains
El siguiente mensaje fue enviado desde el formulario
de consulta de su sitio por ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
el miércoles 30 de enero de 2002 a las 09:24:56
---
:: You wont believe what one of our reporters filmed Britney Spears Doi
Frank,
I've put up a developer FAQ for DRI. It's really just developer oriented
so it's complementary to the existing FAQ.
In the IRC meeting it was agreed that it should be on the DRI website
and its source on CVS.
Only the SGML source is on CVS. At this moment I still publicize in it
that the
> It's puzzling that chown-chmod would have any baleful effect.
> With a plain
> file, once you've opened it you can monkey with the inode all
> you want and
> the filehandle remains valid, and similarly with devfs the
> various device
> inodes (/dev/misc/psaux, modem TTY, etc.) can be chowned
On Mit, 2002-01-30 at 10:32, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On 30 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
>
> > > Btw, while I've been sleeping I thought how we could get CCE support into
> > > Xvideo. The thing I am really against is duplicating code for case with
> > > CCE and without.
> >
On 30 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 15:30, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 28 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 10:00, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 28 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] D
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 15:30, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
>
> On 28 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 10:00, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 28 Jan 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 04:54, Davor Buvini
46 matches
Mail list logo
