[Dri-devel] DRM/DRI porting guide?

2002-01-15 Thread John Utz
greetings; i am interested in writing the bits required to get dri working on the SiS 630E (which evidently contains an SiS300 and SiS 301, among other things) on FreeBSD. It's my understanding that this chipset is supported under Linux, but i havent poked around in the tree yet. is there such a

Re: [Dri-devel] [[email protected]: drm_agpsupport.h]

2002-01-15 Thread Nicolas Aspert
> > Perhaps it was different revisions of the same chipset. I'm not sure > of the exact details, however I do remember someone complaining about > this fact. > Anyway, there is a correct entry for the chipset in agpgart_be.c : { PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8367_0, PCI_VENDOR_ID

RE: [Dri-devel] [[email protected]: drm_agpsupport.h]

2002-01-15 Thread Gareth Hughes
> I would be quite surprised if the two chipsets had the same PCI id (have > a look at the pci.ids in the linux kernel)... they should only share the > same vendor id, which makes the agpgart code work properly (I think Via > is less silly than Intel that has the nasty habit of changing the >

Re: [Dri-devel] [[email protected]: drm_agpsupport.h]

2002-01-15 Thread Martin 'Goran' Moravec
> > Hello > > Which kernel version are you using ? Can you also send the output of > 'lspci -nv' s.t. one can see whether your chipset is correctly detected ? > kernel 2.4.17 - no patches glaugrung:/home/goran# lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8367 [KT266] 00:01.0 PCI br

Re: [Dri-devel] [[email protected]: drm_agpsupport.h]

2002-01-15 Thread Nicolas Aspert
Gareth Hughes wrote: > > The two chipsets have the same PCI ID, as far as I know. Thus, AGPGART > will think it's a KT133. This shouldn't be a problem in general. > I would be quite surprised if the two chipsets had the same PCI id (have a look at the pci.ids in the linux kernel)... they

Re: [Dri-devel] [[email protected]: drm_agpsupport.h]

2002-01-15 Thread Nicolas Aspert
Martin 'Goran' Moravec wrote: > Hi, > I've found something strange in reporting the chipset: > > I've got ATI R128 on VIA kt 266 chipset, Yet the driver writes: > > [drm] AGP 0.99 on VIA Apollo KT133 @ 0xe000 64MB > [drm] Initialized r128 2.1.6 20010405 on minor 0 > > the chipset IS kt266

RE: [Dri-devel] [[email protected]: drm_agpsupport.h]

2002-01-15 Thread Gareth Hughes
> I've found something strange in reporting the chipset: > > I've got ATI R128 on VIA kt 266 chipset, Yet the driver writes: > > [drm] AGP 0.99 on VIA Apollo KT133 @ 0xe000 64MB > [drm] Initialized r128 2.1.6 20010405 on minor 0 > > the chipset IS kt266 > goran@glaugrung:~\>> /sbin/lspci >

[Dri-devel] [[email protected]: drm_agpsupport.h]

2002-01-15 Thread Martin 'Goran' Moravec
Hi, I've found something strange in reporting the chipset: I've got ATI R128 on VIA kt 266 chipset, Yet the driver writes: [drm] AGP 0.99 on VIA Apollo KT133 @ 0xe000 64MB [drm] Initialized r128 2.1.6 20010405 on minor 0 the chipset IS kt266 goran@glaugrung:~\>> /sbin/lspci 00:00.0 Host br