[Dri-devel] 5-10 lines of code. Do u see a bug?

2002-01-04 Thread Dark Avenger
Using XMMS 1.2.5 and the plugin OpenGL Spectrum Analyzer 1.2.5 that comes with it gives errors on both X11 4.1.0 w/ DRI + tdfx driver and NVidia OGL driver. The errors are of type: 1) Seg. Fault and Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x1728)! 2) Gdk-ERROR **: BadValue (integer parameter

[Dri-devel] Re: Voodoo5 SLI / AA -> Win32 Dissasemblers

2002-01-04 Thread smitty
Hej! There are plenty of free dissamblers but you will get x86 assmbler code (but hey that's better than binary) there are even some that are willing to convert some of that assembler to "pseudo" C. cheers Liam PS If anyone wants to help me aquire (I'll do the rest) documentation of DRI supp

Re: [Dri-devel] Voodoo5 SLI / AA

2002-01-04 Thread Derrik Pates
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Deepak Chandrashekar wrote: > Thats a shame. Why would Nvidia not want to release docs for the > V5. After all in their own words "...let the technology progress > and time for us to move on ..." which implies that the V5 is > obsolete. Because they don't want to let go of an

Re: [Dri-devel] Voodoo5 SLI / AA

2002-01-04 Thread Ian D Romanick
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:06:09AM -0800, Deepak Chandrashekar wrote: > > has all but stopped. Of course, I'd love to see SLI support > > materialize - > > I still have my Voodoo5 AGP, and would love to extend its life. > > my sentiments exactly ! Which is exactly why the don't release the docs

Re: [Dri-devel] Voodoo5 SLI / AA

2002-01-04 Thread Deepak Chandrashekar
Hi Derrik, Thanks for your mail. Please see below. --- Derrik Pates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't heard anything. AFAIK all that intellectual property went > to > nVidia, and nVidia's very stingy with docs. The odds of getting > programming info for the Voodoo5 out of them is not

Re: [Dri-devel] Voodoo5 SLI / AA

2002-01-04 Thread Derrik Pates
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Deepak Chandrashekar wrote: > I was taking a look at the code from the SLI branch. > Not much progress seems to have been made in terms of getting the > SLI working. I dont know if this is possible without some kind > of documentation. Any updates on this from anyone as far as

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] glxgears framerate for Voodoo4/5

2002-01-04 Thread Mike
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 04:03, Steven Walter wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:48:24PM -0500, Aciel wrote: >> > Okay, found one of the many problems. It didn't want libglide.so.3 to be >> > real--it wanted a static link. So now instead of that odd error a

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] glxgears framerate for Voodoo4/5

2002-01-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 04:03, Steven Walter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:48:24PM -0500, Aciel wrote: > > Okay, found one of the many problems. It didn't want libglide.so.3 to be > > real--it wanted a static link. So now instead of that odd error about > > glXChooseVisual, I get something muc