On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jacek [iso-8859-2] Pop³awski wrote:
> you really don't have problems with OpenGL? for example with Blender...?
> am I the only one?
I've had XMMS's GL spectrum analyzer plugin (a) kill XMMS when trying to
stop the plugin, and (b) hang the X server (mouse pointer moves still,
On Monday 18 June 2001 13:00, you wrote:
> I'm also starting to look at the code for the mach64. What do you mean with
> the new driver template code? Are you talking about the structure of the
> ATI driver in the mach64 branch?
I think that's what the code that's in the trunk is using for desig
On Monday 18 June 2001 13:00, you wrote:
> I'm also starting to look at the code for the mach64. What do you mean with
> the new driver template code? Are you talking about the structure of the
> ATI driver in the mach64 branch?
I think that's what the code that's in the trunk is using for desig
I haven't seen OpenGL problems, but then again I am not a heavy OpenGL user.
I only reported the problem I have personal experience with (I have seen at
least 2 other people report similar/the same problem).
--
Manuel A. McLure - Unify Corp. Technical Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Zathras is used t
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, MacGyver wrote:
> I tried asking on dri-users and didn't get any feedback, so as they say,
> go to the horse's mouth...
>
> I bought a Matrox G450 PCI card. It's important to note that this is
> the PCI version of the G450 and not the AGP card.
I don't know anything about
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:07:38PM -0700, Manuel A. McLure wrote:
> The other reported tdfx problem is the one where
(...)
you really don't have problems with OpenGL? for example with Blender...?
am I the only one?
--
Love is automatic pleasure
Virtual reality
Terminal hate - it's a calculation
I tried asking on dri-users and didn't get any feedback, so as they say,
go to the horse's mouth...
I bought a Matrox G450 PCI card. It's important to note that this is
the PCI version of the G450 and not the AGP card. Which is where the
trouble begins...so I have X running, mostly...now I want
Adam Williams wrote:
>
> Using a Radeon 64MB, XFree86 4.1.0, kernel 2.4.5-ac16
>
> Currently it looks like the largest texture I can upload is limited to
> the nearest 2^n pixels below the horizontal resolution of the screen.
> Is there any way to work around this and get a 2048x2048 texture on
Using a Radeon 64MB, XFree86 4.1.0, kernel 2.4.5-ac16
Currently it looks like the largest texture I can upload is limited to
the nearest 2^n pixels below the horizontal resolution of the screen.
Is there any way to work around this and get a 2048x2048 texture on a
1600x1200 screen?
Another thing
The other reported tdfx problem is the one where changing resolutions can
cause the X server to crash - happens on 4.1.0 and on late pre-4.1.0 DRI
trunk. This is on a V5 5500 in my case. It is not easily reproducible, so I
have not been able to get an X server log (it usually happens when in run
l
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:10:41AM +0200, Simon Cahuk wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 07:57:19PM +0200, Simon Cahuk wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I have still problems with the tdfx driver. I think it is a memory related
> > > problem. Te problem wasn't the
Hello. I'm working in adapting the mach64 drm driver to the new template
structure. I have a pair of questions:
What is the meaning of the __HAVE_SG define? I've set it to zero in the
mach64 driver, but I'm not sure about this supposition.
In the mach64_dma.c , the following line:
dev_priv->s
Este es un mensaje de prueba del servicio tecnico de eresMas. No
responda a este mensaje, si necesita soporte tecnico por favor
solicitelo en:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saludos cordiales
S.A.C eresMas
---
¿Has hecho amig@s en el chat? ¿Te gustaría hablar con ell@s?
¡Entra y descubre cómo contactar!
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 07:57:19PM +0200, Simon Cahuk wrote:
> Hi,
> I have still problems with the tdfx driver. I think it is a memory related
> problem. Te problem wasn't there in X 4.0.3 and before. So I'm asking what
> was changed? 'Cos I want use X 4.1.0 but I can't 'cos of this problem. And
Hi,
I have still problems with the tdfx driver. I think it is a memory related
problem. Te problem wasn't there in X 4.0.3 and before. So I'm asking what
was changed? 'Cos I want use X 4.1.0 but I can't 'cos of this problem. And
to Mike Harris, I think there is a patch for that problem, but o
> Good point - I have X4.1.0 and kernel 2.4.5, and no DRI with my Radeon under
> Linux.
>
> 2.4.5 gives me radeon.o in /lib/modules/blah
> X4.1.0 gives me a radeon_drv.o somewhere in /usr/X11R6/lib
>
> insmod /path/to/it/radeon_drv.o doesn't do anything,
> insmod radeon.o works, but only is vers
16 matches
Mail list logo
