Hey,
I just noticed a recent patch to dri for Radeon PCI support.
I thought there wasnt any yet? Is this patch against the version included
in X 4.1 to CVS or to a previous version? I figure I may as well give it a
try.
Also all the downloadable releases on the DRI project page seem to be gone
Hi Matthew,
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Sottek, Matthew J wrote:
> I think the known limitations was written a long time ago,
> multiple servers has been working at least for some people for
> quite some time. I am not sure of what configurations are
> working and which are not.
OK, I guess I have o
El Lun 18 Jun 2001 22:46, escribiste:
> "Jeremy W. Bean" wrote:
> > On Monday 18 June 2001 12:00, you wrote:
> > > I'm also starting to look at the code for the mach64. What do you mean
> > > with the new driver template code? Are you talking about the structure
> > > of the ATI driver in the mach
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:28:33PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
> -
>Frankÿÿÿî/Ýz÷¥¨¥x%ËC®/Ýz÷¥þX¬¶Ïì¢êÜyú+ïçzØm¶ÿþX¬¶Ïì¢êÜyú+ïçzßåËlþX¬¶)ߣ÷k÷^
>
Is that Unicode for Worsley? :-)
- |Daryll
¸z÷¥¨¥x%ËC®'^½
"Jeremy W. Bean" wrote:
>
> On Monday 18 June 2001 12:00, you wrote:
>
> > I'm also starting to look at the code for the mach64. What do you mean
> > with the new driver template code? Are you talking about the structure of
> > the ATI driver in the mach64 branch?
> > Any help will be appreciate
I have an Asus A7V with a Rage Fury Pro (Rage128 Pro, AGP, 32megs). I am running it
with no problems at AGP 4x. But maybe I have a later revision of the KT133 chipset?
You should also try downloading a bios update from the Asus site. That might fix it.
- Frank¸z÷¥¨¥x%ËC®'^½éeËl²«qçè
On Monday 18 June 2001 12:00, you wrote:
> I'm also starting to look at the code for the mach64. What do you mean with
> the new driver template code? Are you talking about the structure of the
> ATI driver in the mach64 branch?
> Any help will be appreciated.
>
>From what I can tell about the d
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:48:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Good point - I have X4.1.0 and kernel 2.4.5, and no DRI with my Radeon under
> Linux.
>
> 2.4.5 gives me radeon.o in /lib/modules/blah
> X4.1.0 gives me a radeon_drv.o somewhere in /usr/X11R6/lib
>
> insmod /path/to/it/radeon_d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Good point - I have X4.1.0 and kernel 2.4.5, and no DRI with my Radeon under
> Linux.
>
> 2.4.5 gives me radeon.o in /lib/modules/blah
> X4.1.0 gives me a radeon_drv.o somewhere in /usr/X11R6/lib
>
> insmod /path/to/it/radeon_drv.o doesn't do anything,
> insmod rade
Good point - I have X4.1.0 and kernel 2.4.5, and no DRI with my Radeon under
Linux.
2.4.5 gives me radeon.o in /lib/modules/blah
X4.1.0 gives me a radeon_drv.o somewhere in /usr/X11R6/lib
insmod /path/to/it/radeon_drv.o doesn't do anything,
insmod radeon.o works, but only is version 1.0.0, not 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
>I have had the absolute worst luck getting any Rage128 or Radeon-based ATI
>card to work on my Asus A7V (Via Apollo Pro KT133 chipset), but the
>unofficial FAQ on bork-DCC in #dri on OpenProjects notes that there are
>tr
I have had the absolute worst luck getting any Rage128 or Radeon-based ATI
card to work on my Asus A7V (Via Apollo Pro KT133 chipset), but the
unofficial FAQ on bork-DCC in #dri on OpenProjects notes that there are
tremendous problems with "early Via chipsets," which I guess the KT133
falls under
El Lun 18 Jun 2001 13:48, escribiste:
> On Sunday 17 June 2001 21:42, you wrote:
> > Have you looked at the new driver template code? I'm not a developer,
> > but this sounds like the most logical place to start. Using the template
> > code and changing the registers appropriately to suit the ma
You're right, mgaConvertTexture needs to handle RGB5_A1 as a special
case. But there is no need to redefined MGAPACKCOLOR1555, check
MGAPACKCOLOR555.
So this is the patch to apply over the other one.
Thanks Ralf,
Karl
ralf willenbacher wrote:
>Karl Lessard wrote:
>
>>Hi everybody,
>>
>>thi
Neale,
I think the known limitations was written a long time ago,
multiple servers has been working at least for some people for
quite some time. I am not sure of what configurations are
working and which are not.
The debug information you provided doesn't say if you are
using DRI or not. Are
Este es un mensaje de prueba del servicio tecnico de eresMas. No
responda a este mensaje, si necesita soporte tecnico por favor
solicitelo en:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saludos cordiales
S.A.C eresMas
---
Entra en Eltinglao y rompe las reglas.
Publica tus propias noticias y gana 10.000 ptas.
Pinc
Does the combination
Rage128 RF chipset and the VIA KT133 (VT8363) work
for DRI ?
I have such a combination and it does not work, whereas
with the same Graphics card and a Pentium bord
DRI works with the same configuration.
Any ideas what I could do to make it work?
Alexander Strohmaier
_
On Sunday 17 June 2001 21:42, you wrote:
> Have you looked at the new driver template code? I'm not a developer, but
> this sounds like the most logical place to start. Using the template code
> and changing the registers appropriately to suit the mach64 seems like the
> best way to avoid dupli
18 matches
Mail list logo
