"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Digital Z-Man wrote:
>
>
> Well, you haven't looked very hard my friend. ;o)
>
> The design document is included in the XFree86 source code, and
> always has been.
>
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/doc/DESIGN
>
> In fairness to you though, it isn'
Finally I get some time to throw my 2 cents into this ... :)
First of all I would like to say it is a shame to see you go, Gareth. You've
done some really great work on this project and I think everybody appreciates
it a lot!! I hope you have a good time relaxing for a while and find a good
jo
Hi everybody,
as you know, Matrox wants to help the development of the open-source
driver from in-house, and that's the primary reason of why I'm currently
here. I'm working on other stuff related to Linux too that may takes me
sometime from learning and working on DRI. But nothing has chang
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 11:50:37AM -0400, Mike Westall wrote:
| We have an application (``instant'' radiosity) that needs to read
| back depth information from the graphics card. ...
Ironically enough I checked-in a glean test for this just last week.
Allen
Mike Westall wrote:
>
> We have an application (``instant'' radiosity) that needs to read
> back depth information from the graphics card. We find that this
> operation appears to work fine
>
> (1) using software only rendering (e.g. by not loading r128.o
> and
> (2) on Nvidia GeForce2's
>
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Andreas Ehliar wrote:
>> Perhaps, but it is a very very very minimal NDA. Definitely not
>> an evil NDA, or many people myself included wouldn't agree to it.
>
>Certainly, but you have to be "inside" to have any chance of
>getting this NDA. That is my impression at least. If
