On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:09:43PM -0700, Digital Z-Man wrote:
>
>
>
> Good point. And by keeping it internal like that, it concentrates the
> knowledge
> base in a small area. I don't mean to offend, but the same group takes
> away the
> most intellectual knowhow from making these drivers.
I know a really cool company in San Diego that could use his talents ;-)
But I'm sure he doesn't need our help to find a job ;-)
L8r, Ice.
Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > My association with VA Linux Systems came to and end last week. Many of
> > you will not know that I was never actually an employ
Digital Z-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> >
> > >c) There are limited projects - cards are usually not supported because of
> > >an nVidia-like situation or have a well known "guru" doing the coding. No
> > >nice easy intros to coding drivers.
> >
> > The DESIGN doc
Good point. And by keeping it internal like that, it concentrates the
knowledge
base in a small area. I don't mean to offend, but the same group takes
away the
most intellectual knowhow from making these drivers. It doesn't really
help those
that are on the outside looking in, and want to h
> My association with VA Linux Systems came to and end last week. Many of
> you will not know that I was never actually an employee of Precision
> Insight or VA. I started at PI as a contractor, with the expectation
> that once US work visa issues were resolved I'd relocate from Australia
> and
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> >c) There are limited projects - cards are usually not supported because of
> >an nVidia-like situation or have a well known "guru" doing the coding. No
> >nice easy intros to coding drivers.
>
> The DESIGN document is pretty much a good start.
If one can get it. I
Occasinally, when exiting q3demo or changing video modes, X will hang
I haven't seen any particular pattern to when this happens, but when it
does happen, the mouse cursor is shown in the far upper left corner, and
both the pointer and crosshair are present. X doesn't respond, but
SysRq does. T
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2001 04:55 schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> It would be more complicated soon as more and more people start using the
> new Athlon 4/MP / Duron mobile 'cause they support 3DNow! Professional
> (full Intel SSE). The configure script (the user?) have to decide which one
> to use (3DNow!
It would be more complicated soon as more and more people start using the new
Athlon 4/MP / Duron mobile 'cause they support 3DNow! Professional (full
Intel SSE). The configure script (the user?) have to decide which one to use
(3DNow!/3DNow! enhanced or SSE).
Gareth which perform better on Ath
Dieter N=FCtzel writes:
> one (?) file is missing in Mesa-3.5:
>=20
> make[5]: *** No rule to make target `/opt/Mesa/src/SPARC/misc.S', ne=
eded by=20
> `misc.S'. Stop.
I just double checked and I did commit it to the CVS repository.
Maybe anoncvs takes some extra time to get the new file.
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Will Newton wrote:
>> In theory, yes. In practice? Not really. Sure, the odd patch is
>> submitted, but that's about it. Not much else has come from the "open
>> source community"...
>
>Probably because:
>
>a) XFree86 is a big horrible beast (esp. if you're using a dial-up
Hello Brian,
one (?) file is missing in Mesa-3.5:
make[5]: *** No rule to make target `/opt/Mesa/src/SPARC/misc.S', needed by
`misc.S'. Stop.
Thanks,
Dieter
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 03:28:49AM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> Digital Z-Man wrote:
> >
> > Well, anyone who wants to, IMO.
>
> In theory, yes. In practice? Not really. Sure, the odd patch is
> submitted, but that's about it. Not much else has come from the "open
> source community"...
H
It would seem that Keith Whitwell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> It's slightly chicken and egg - without a strong external developer or two,
> there was no impetus to take those discussions off the va/pi internal lists.
>
Precision Insight did after all hire most of the significant contributors
to t
> > In theory, yes. In practice? Not really. Sure, the odd patch is
> > submitted, but that's about it. Not much else has come from the "open
> > source community"...
>
> The fact that most of the interesting design discussions took place on closed
> mailing lists didn't help a lot, I'm sure.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> In theory, yes. In practice? Not really. Sure, the odd patch is
> submitted, but that's about it. Not much else has come from the "open
> source community"...
Probably because:
a) XFree86 is a big horrible beast (esp. if you're using a dial-up)
b)
Gareth Hughes wrote:
>
> Digital Z-Man wrote:
> >
> > Well, anyone who wants to, IMO.
>
> In theory, yes. In practice? Not really. Sure, the odd patch is
> submitted, but that's about it. Not much else has come from the "open
> source community"...
The fact that most of the interesting desi
Nick Floussov wrote:
>
> Please, add support for ATI XPERT 2000 (Rage 128 SM): vendor 1002, device
> 0x534D.
Why don't you generate a patch that does this? That way, applying it is
trivial :-)
The file you're after is
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86PciInfo.h in case you're
wondering
Digital Z-Man wrote:
>
> Well, anyone who wants to, IMO.
In theory, yes. In practice? Not really. Sure, the odd patch is
submitted, but that's about it. Not much else has come from the "open
source community"...
-- Gareth
___
Dri-devel mailing li
Thank you for entering.
You have been specially selected to qualify for the following:
Grand prize -
Florida Bahamas vacation and cruise
1st prize - Airline tickets
Other Prizes - 3 days and 2 nights hotel accommodations
Please confirm your entry within 24 hours of receipt of this confi
20 matches
Mail list logo
