"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> >
> >gcc -E common_x86_asm.S > common_x86_asm.s
>
> Yep, that caught me as strange too, so I added to my host.def:
>
> #define PreProcessCmd cpp
>
> And the problem went away...
For me as well, but it does seem to be rather odd that this would be
required.
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Brian Paul wrote:
>> Yep, that caught me as strange too, so I added to my host.def:
>>
>> #define PreProcessCmd cpp
>>
>> And the problem went away...
>
>I looked at this for a bit but still don't understand what's going on.
>Are you happy with your solution or do y
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:25:59PM -0600, Jeff Hartmann wrote:
>
>> Could you make a debug build (add "#define DoLoadableServer NO" to your
>> host.def), and step through the RADEONSave and RADEONModeInit functions
>> in gdb and see if the lockup happens th
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:25:59PM -0600, Jeff Hartmann wrote:
> Could you make a debug build (add "#define DoLoadableServer NO" to your
> host.def), and step through the RADEONSave and RADEONModeInit functions
> in gdb and see if the lockup happens there?
Can do. Do you care if I build
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:53:56AM -0600, Jeff Hartmann wrote:
>
>> seeing. I need to spend some time with an AMD engineer to get AGP
>> completely stable on all the Irongate revisions. I have been told there
>> are some revision specific workarounds that
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:36:29PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>On Mon, 21 May 2001, Brian Paul wrote:
>
>>> >I tried building the trunk code (according to the guide) and have run
>>> >into a raft of errors in the Mesa portion of the tree. Some sample error
>>> >messages:
>>> >
>>> >gcc -E commo
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2001, Brian Paul wrote:
>
> >> >I tried building the trunk code (according to the guide) and have run
> >> >into a raft of errors in the Mesa portion of the tree. Some sample error
> >> >messages:
> >> >
> >> >gcc -E common_x86_asm.S > common_x86_asm.s
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:53:56AM -0600, Jeff Hartmann wrote:
> seeing. I need to spend some time with an AMD engineer to get AGP
> completely stable on all the Irongate revisions. I have been told there
> are some revision specific workarounds that need to be done. and I have
> not re
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Brian Paul wrote:
>> >I tried building the trunk code (according to the guide) and have run
>> >into a raft of errors in the Mesa portion of the tree. Some sample error
>> >messages:
>> >
>> >gcc -E common_x86_asm.S > common_x86_asm.s
>> >common_x86_asm.S:37:22: assyntax.h:
>> I have no idea where to start though to do that myself. Any help
>> on doing this would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>I think we've been over this before but let's see I've got the whole
>picture.
First time I've encountered it, I think the topic has likely come
up before, but it was not with
Petr Sebor wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > With a test program I've determined that GL_LINEAR_MIPMAP_NEAREST and
> > GL_NEAREST_MIPMAP_LINEAR seem to be transposed. I think the Radeon
> > docs may be in error.
> >
> > Try GL_NEAREST_MIPMAP_LINEAR in your program and see if that has the
> > desired effe
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2001, David Dawes wrote:
>
> >>In our specfile, right after everything is built, and installed
> >>into a builtroot dummy area via RPM, we delete Mesa with the
> >>following code in our specfile:
> >>
> >>
> >>{
> >> rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/include
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2001, John Cavan wrote:
>
> >I tried building the trunk code (according to the guide) and have run
> >into a raft of errors in the Mesa portion of the tree. Some sample error
> >messages:
> >
> >gcc -E common_x86_asm.S > common_x86_asm.s
> >common_x86_
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 02:10:43PM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> I'm currently working on some kernel-related tasks, but I can take a
>>> look into the problems you (and others) have mentioned regarding the
>>> Radeon driver early next week. Are you ru
Sorry for the multi-purpose mail
1) Remarks concerning the installation of tdfx-0.7:
- first I was dummy enough to try installing without the Extras packages,
so I first got a ABI version error. I Read the F... Manual, and solved
this trouble.
- second and more serious, I lost lot of time try
Hi,
> On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 02:10:43PM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
>
> > I'm currently working on some kernel-related tasks, but I can take a
> > look into the problems you (and others) have mentioned regarding the
> > Radeon driver early next week. Are you running it from the DRI CVS? If
>
Ilan Rabinovitch wrote:
> I can seem to get my PCI Radeon 32MB SDRAM card working on my x86 box w/DRI.
> So far others Ive spoken too who have the PCI Radeon arent having luck
> either. Im using the 0.7 release of dri and kernel 2.4.3. Anyone have a
> working XF86Config I could use? Is the P
17 matches
Mail list logo
