The date doesn't relate to the date of the snapshot or build, but the date
of the last major modification to the code, IIRC.
Adam
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Scott Billings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Just donwloded the latest DRI driver for the Radeon on x86, and wh
Scott Billings wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Just donwloded the latest DRI driver for the Radeon on x86, and when I
> run glxinfo I get the string:
>
> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Radeon 20010402 AGP 1x x86/MMX/3DNow!
>
> What is curious to me, is the date
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just donwloded the latest DRI driver for the Radeon on x86, and when I
run glxinfo I get the string:
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Radeon 20010402 AGP 1x x86/MMX/3DNow!
What is curious to me, is the date. The package I got was labled as a
snap
Gareth Hughes wrote:
>
> I recently upgraded to gcc 2.95.3 from RH 6.2's 2.91.66, and have
> stumbled across what looks like a compiler bug. Certainly, the fact
> that the trunk code with Glide 3 from CVS used to work, and now
> segfaults in the guts of _grValidateState() (and the asm code looks
I was just taking a look at this -- can we change
gunzip .tar.gz
tar -xvof .tar
to
tar -zxvof .tar.gz
in the installation instructions? And why do we need -o anyway?
-- Gareth
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
I've ported David's new Imakefile system for lib/GL from the trunk
to the 3.5 branch. My changes are checked in and I'm in the middle
of a test build on my second system. I might not be able to check
on whether it completes until tomorrow, however.
Alan, I had some trouble getting the gamma dr
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:54:22PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
> >
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:25:59AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> > > > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > CVSROOT:/cvsroot/dri
> > > > > Module name:xc
> > > >
Brian Paul wrote:
>
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:25:59AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> > > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > >
> > > > CVSROOT:/cvsroot/dri
> > > > Module name:xc
> > > > Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/dri/
> > > > Changes by: alanh@usw-pr-c
Andreas Ehliar wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:56:42PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
> > > The DRM module from the DRI CVS seems to work fine in 2.4.4.
> > > (The one in the kernel however does seem to be broken.)
> >
> > Isn't it generally best to use the module from the CVS/packages in any
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:25:59AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >
> > > CVSROOT:/cvsroot/dri
> > > Module name:xc
> > > Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/dri/
> > > Changes by: alanh@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/04/30 02:21:57
> > >
> >
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:25:59AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > CVSROOT:/cvsroot/dri
> > Module name:xc
> > Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/dri/
> > Changes by: alanh@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/04/30 02:21:57
> >
> > Log message:
> > include glheader.h i
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> CVSROOT:/cvsroot/dri
> Module name:xc
> Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/dri/
> Changes by: alanh@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/04/30 02:21:57
>
> Log message:
> include glheader.h instead of glcore.h to pickup define of CAPI.
>
> Modified files:
> xc/x
I recently upgraded to gcc 2.95.3 from RH 6.2's 2.91.66, and have
stumbled across what looks like a compiler bug. Certainly, the fact
that the trunk code with Glide 3 from CVS used to work, and now
segfaults in the guts of _grValidateState() (and the asm code looks
plain wrong where the segfault
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:56:42PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
> > The DRM module from the DRI CVS seems to work fine in 2.4.4.
> > (The one in the kernel however does seem to be broken.)
>
> Isn't it generally best to use the module from the CVS/packages in any
> case, no matter if the kernel mo
14 matches
Mail list logo
