We broke something in the install script. Don't update using the script
until we include an updated one in new packages (tomorrow I guess).
Also, you will need to download the Extras package if you are updating any
stock XFree86 release (including 4.0.3).
See the readme on the website for more i
>From: "John X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Dri-devel] Radeon SDR provlems fixed (for me at least)
>My Radeon SDR is now working perfectly. I haven't yet had a crash or
>sonsole corruption (or serious visual glitch) with the radeon-20010418
>drivers. uptime is 1 day and 6 hours so far. I ha
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 04:43:55PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Are there known blending bugs in the mga-driver (g400)? When I render many
> > additive polygons on the top of each other with small alpha-value
> > (something like 0.05) the result is som
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Sottek, Matthew J wrote:
> Oh,
> That explains some things. I am not using your cvs as it
> would be more trouble than it is worth. The XvMC portions
> are very fresh in the XFree tree and I don't think you've
> merged them in, so I am using the XFree cvs
Hi!
Does DRI work under FreeBSD? Can I compile glide under it (my chip is
banshee)?
Thanks
Simon
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Are there known blending bugs in the mga-driver (g400)? When I render many
> additive polygons on the top of each other with small alpha-value
> (something like 0.05) the result is something it shouldn't be with g400.
> With software-mesa it's correct as wel
Oh,
That explains some things. I am not using your cvs as it
would be more trouble than it is worth. The XvMC portions
are very fresh in the XFree tree and I don't think you've
merged them in, so I am using the XFree cvs. However, I
also need the latest kernels so my drm sources are from
kernel 2
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:08:20PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:13:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a G450 card at work.
> > Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package,
> > which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded.
> Ouc
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:13:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a G450 card at work.
> Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package,
> which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded.
Ouch, you're going to be annoyed that you missed this, but .debs are
alre
Hi,
I have a G450 card at work.
Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package,
which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded.
Now I have installed the stuff, and surprise surprise, it does want a
new kernel module... 3.0.x, and not 2.0.0.
Major trouble, since there is a rule
Philip Willoughby wrote:
>
> Today, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:17:25PM +0100, Philip Willoughby wrote:
> >> > Is there a good reason for the xc directory nested in the DRI CVS xc
> >> > directory? I
Today, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:17:25PM +0100, Philip Willoughby wrote:
>> > Is there a good reason for the xc directory nested in the DRI CVS xc
>> > directory? I ask because it requires 119Mb of disk sp
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:17:25PM +0100, Philip Willoughby wrote:
> > Is there a good reason for the xc directory nested in the DRI CVS xc
> > directory? I ask because it requires 119Mb of disk space, takes an age to
> > download
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:17:25PM +0100, Philip Willoughby wrote:
> Is there a good reason for the xc directory nested in the DRI CVS xc
> directory? I ask because it requires 119Mb of disk space, takes an age to
> download for new users, and it is not used by `make World' or
> `make install'.
>
Is there a good reason for the xc directory nested in the DRI CVS xc
directory? I ask because it requires 119Mb of disk space, takes an age to
download for new users, and it is not used by `make World' or
`make install'.
If it is not needed, could it be removed?
Regards,
Philip Willoughby
--
Sottek, Matthew J wrote:
> All,
> I'm doing a direct rendered HWMC (XvMC protocol) driver for the i81x, I am
> compiling the drm Libs outside of the X server and have run into a problem.
> The
> current Linux kernel is allocating minor numbers for the device dynamically,
> but
> the drm Libs don
Hi all,
I wonder, if there's anyone working on the mach64-driver yet? After Gareth
stopped working on it, there seems to be noone, who is further working on it.
Is the development on the mach64 dead?
cya. markus
--
Markus Kohls - Postmaster http://www.bnet-ibb.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP
Kathy Harris wrote:
>
> The latest linux Drm kernel source has files radeon_context.c and
> radeon_bufs.c,
> but these aren't used in the build (via Makefile.linux). Instead, the
> build includes
> drm_context.h and drm_bufs.h./
>
> Are the radeon_context.c, radeon_bufs.c old files that can be
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Frank wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Gaarenstroom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 8:14 AM
> Subject: SiS DRI driver fix!!!
>
> > I don't want to mix up the DRI-development, so I 'm just mailing this
> > sin
19 matches
Mail list logo
