Sorry, I follow the list religiously, but
am not clear. Would someone mind briefly
explaining the current relationship between
X4.0.3, the dri cvs-trunk and kernel 2.4.3?
I know that 4.0.3 came out right before a
dri->X cvs merge and some aa/render changes
were added to 4.0.3, and also that ther
"Kevin E. Martin" wrote:
> Log message:
> - Port pcigart code from old pcigart branch and add Alpha support (Jay
> Estabrook, Compaq)
> - Fix a few problems to allow it to work on ix86
> - Rage 128 support works fine, Radeon locks up after a few seconds
Sounds promising - quite an effe
> From: Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> OK, here's what I've found. It's basically a version problem between
> the DRM code that's in the DRI trunk vs the 2.4.0 kernel.
>
> Evidently the DRM code on the DRI trunk was updated for kernel 2.4.3
> and that broke compatibility with 2.4.[012].
>
>
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 07:59:34AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> In Joseph Carter's message from Saturday, March 31 he wrote:
>
> > In short, DRI is going to change a lot in the next couple of months and if
> > you buy new hardware it might end up a bumpy ride (I'm finding this out
> > the hard way.
Kevin E Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:01:38AM -0600, Jeff Hartmann wrote:
>
>> Jay Estabrook wrote:
>>
>>> I've got a problem with a PCI Radeon on an Alpha that I've just about
>>> started tearing my hair out over, and I don't have that much to
>>> waste, hence my plea for help...
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:01:38AM -0600, Jeff Hartmann wrote:
> Jay Estabrook wrote:
>
> > I've got a problem with a PCI Radeon on an Alpha that I've just about
> > started tearing my hair out over, and I don't have that much to
> > waste, hence my plea for help... ;-}
> >
> > Background: porte
> Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I heard somewhere that XFree86 DRI will get a major rework in the
>> next few months.
>>
>> What kind of rework are these, what can we expect?
>>
>> Is there something like a Roadmap?
>>
>> Where is DRI going to? What will we see in future?
> In Joseph Cart
Jay Estabrook wrote:
> I've got a problem with a PCI Radeon on an Alpha that I've just about
> started tearing my hair out over, and I don't have that much to
> waste, hence my plea for help... ;-}
>
> Background: ported the pcigart-0-0-1-branch to Alpha and successfully
> ran OpenGL apps (gears
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:21:48PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> Is this Radeon card the only one in the box ? I mean is it getting
> initialized by the AlphaBIOS firmware under X86 emulation (not by int10) ?
Only card in the box, and it gets initialized by Alpha FW during initial
boot, and
Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I heard somewhere that XFree86 DRI will get a major rework in the
> next few months.
>
> What kind of rework are these, what can we expect?
>
> Is there something like a Roadmap?
>
> Where is DRI going to? What will we see in future?
In Joseph Carter's messa
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:20:35AM -0400, Jay Estabrook wrote:
> So, any ideas? What can I try next? What other info do you need?
>
Jay,
Is this Radeon card the only one in the box ? I mean is it getting
initialized by the AlphaBIOS firmware under X86 emulation (not by int10) ?
Alan.
I've got a problem with a PCI Radeon on an Alpha that I've just about
started tearing my hair out over, and I don't have that much to
waste, hence my plea for help... ;-}
Background: ported the pcigart-0-0-1-branch to Alpha and successfully
ran OpenGL apps (gears, of course, and tuxracer :-) on A
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:43:36PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Alan (or anyone more familiar with kernel stuff), is this an acceptable
> patch?
>
Yes, and done.
Alan.
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listi
13 matches
Mail list logo
