RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 - VAULT

2004-12-18 Thread Bryan D. Andrews
er 25, 2004 12:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 - VAULT Any ideas here from Vault users? I thought I remembered someone talking about this a while ago but I could not find it in google... -Original Message- From: Bryan D. Andrews Sent: Tu

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 - VAULT

2004-11-25 Thread Bryan D. Andrews
onday, November 22, 2004 10:33 PM Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 - VAULT Also I am seeing this strange problem with the (vault) build trying to download just a certain date range... : build.All-20040530T072635Z It is stuck on this date range... I went in and manually cha

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 - VAULT

2004-11-23 Thread Bryan D. Andrews
November 22, 2004 10:33 PM Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 - VAULT Also I am seeing this strange problem with the (vault) build trying to download just a certain date range... : build.All-20040530T072635Z It is stuck on this date range... I went in and manually changed the las

Re: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 - VAULT

2004-11-23 Thread Paul Welter
it did not help. Very strange - this install works on another box. Guess I have to roll back again. :( -Original Message- From: Bryan D. Andrews Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 I can send you a config fi

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 - VAULT

2004-11-22 Thread Bryan D. Andrews
on another box. Guess I have to roll back again. :( -Original Message- From: Bryan D. Andrews Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 I can send you a config file but pretty much any changes this happens with

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3

2004-11-15 Thread Bryan D. Andrews
! -Original Message- From: Paul Welter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 Hi, I have not tested vault because I didn't have access to a vault repository. I see that I can get a

Re: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3

2004-11-15 Thread Paul Welter
so let me know of any special kind of config I'll need to do. thanks Paul - Original Message - From: "Bryan D. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 7:27 PM Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 O

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3

2004-11-13 Thread Bryan D. Andrews
--- From: Bryan D. Andrews Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 2:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 It seems that deleting all the buildinfo and log files helped get rid of this error. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Bryan D. Andrews Sent: Satu

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3

2004-11-13 Thread Bryan D. Andrews
It seems that deleting all the buildinfo and log files helped get rid of this error. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Bryan D. Andrews Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 Any idea what might be causing

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3

2004-11-13 Thread Bryan D. Andrews
Any idea what might be causing this: Failed to process build 'DotNetNuke.All'. The following exception occurred: System.InvalidOperationException: Specified IComparer threw an exception. ---> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at Draco.Core.Scc

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta

2004-09-16 Thread Eric J. Smith
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:draconet-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erv Walter > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 2:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; draconet- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta > > The first problem is caused by

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta

2004-09-16 Thread Eric J. Smith
Sorry, forgot to attach the file. Eric J. Smith > -Original Message- > From: Eric J. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:42 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'draconet- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [Dracone

RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta

2004-09-13 Thread Erv Walter
The first problem is caused by an "off by one" error in the log parser for SVN. I fixed this by changing this line of code in SvnLogParser.cs (note the <= instead of just <): // HACK: necessary since svn log always gives you the revisions INCLUSIVE if ( date < sinceDate ) continue; to

Re: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta

2004-09-10 Thread Jeremy Driver
Hello all, I've observed both of the issues Eric mentioned, and would like to mention a third one: The BuildTime value is always NaN. Has anyone else observed this? Jeremy --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170