On 5/15/2014 16:27, Eduardo Mendez wrote:
> Regards,
>
> Today i´ve realized that for everytime i´ve checked IPv6 for all cctlds,
> they are in warning. Now for a little more than a day.
>
> https://tldmon.dns-oarc.net/nagios/
>
> Hugs.
Looks like the IPv6 connectivity on the host has failed.
Regards,
Today i´ve realized that for everytime i´ve checked IPv6 for all cctlds,
they are in warning. Now for a little more than a day.
https://tldmon.dns-oarc.net/nagios/
Hugs.
--
http://eduardo.mendez.net.ve
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-ope
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:12:07PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:12:53AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > I heard they are skipping number 11, the next release would be 9.12.
>
> It's on our roadmap as 9.11.
Apparently i misheard.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available
On 05/15/2014 05:12 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:12:53AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> I heard they are skipping number 11, the next release would be 9.12.
>
> It's on our roadmap as 9.11.
Thanks for being reasonable.
Gilles
--
Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU
6, rue Coudenhove-
On May 15 2014, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 07:19:34PM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
What is the next edition of BIND going to be called then, 10 or 11?
9.11 ;-)
You can always copy what Sun did, when what was called Solaris 2.7 while
it was in beta unexpectedly becam
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:12:53AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I heard they are skipping number 11, the next release would be 9.12.
It's on our roadmap as 9.11.
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
___
dns-operations mailing l
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 06:52:16AM +0200, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> One have to remember that if example.com have an ns in
> ns.example.net and example.net is not renewed, there are already
> problems between example.com and example.net that can not really be
> resolved by adding technical/enginee
On May 15, 2014, at 3:55 AM, João Damas wrote:
> If it is 9.11, it might be good number to make attack resilience the focus of
> that version (a good code audit, more robust error-condition response,
> evolution of RRL and related features, logging that doesn't kill you, etc)
I heard they are
On 14 May 2014, at 23:18, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Then why does't the registry remove all the records below a delegation
> and any records that refer to them from the published zone when a
> delegation is removed?
You're conflating a DNS zone (published from a database) from the registry
(which
If it is 9.11, it might be good number to make attack resilience the focus of
that version (a good code audit, more robust error-condition response,
evolution of RRL and related features, logging that doesn't kill you, etc)
Joao
On 15 May 2014, at 01:19, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> What is
On 15 May 2014, at 04:26, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
> Wayne MacLaurin wrote:
>> Bind 9.11
>>
>> Can’t imagine we’ll see another attempt at a ground up rebuild anytime
>> soon…..
>
> maybe not by ISC. but based on the success of BIND9, NSD, Knot, Unbound,
> Yadifa, and PowerDNS, i think we will
11 matches
Mail list logo
