I think it's not that pythonic as it's just another syntax to do a thing
that we are already able to do with the current syntax. -1.
--
Vinicius Mendes
Globo.com
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Russell Keith-Mage
You can always create your own convenience method.
Atenciosamente,
Vinicius Mendes
Engenheiro de Computação
Globo.com
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Justin Holmes wrote:
> For every convenience method, there are always ways to make it even more
> convenient.
>
> I think that
Hi guys, I didn't like the messages buit-in contrib/auth application. That's
becouse of two points:
- It don't give the ability to send messages to anonymous users (I saw that
it is one of the planned features for 1.1);
- There's no way to distinguish the messages. For example: I like my success
m
I think ORM should have some kind of caching. For example, in docs[1], when
we do:
>>> e = Entry.objects.get(pk=1)
>>> e.blog # Hits database
>>> e.blog # Don't hit database
But let's imagine we have a third model named Author:
class Author(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=5
In the ticket description, the user says that he is using
inlineformset_factory, so do I. The changeset only fixes the FormSet.
ModelFormSet and InlineFormSet are still bugged. In the methods
save_new_objects and save_existing_objects, you have to check if the form is
marked for deletion, if so, de
I was thinking that it would be a good feature if the names of the auth
permissions could be internationalizated. For example, instead of storing
'Can add user' in database, can store something like 'Can add
%(model_verbose_name)s'. And then internationalize it for the user and put
the model name i
AM, Vinicius Mendes wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > What do you think in saving the author value in the blog instance if it is
> > achieved through the author instance? It's something like telling blog who
> > is his author in the moment you are retrieving it from the author.
>
't have a
cleaned_data attr, so I get it from the field, and check it. All the
changes were made in the django/forms/models.py In the methods
save_existing_objects and save_new_objects.
On Mar 31, 2:35 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Vinicius Mendes wrote:
> &g
lex Gaynor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Vinicius Mendes | meiocodigo.com <
>
>
>
> vbmen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I didn't understand. Line 216 is the docstring:
>
> > """
> > Returns True if form.errors is empty for
Here is the problem demonstration:
http://dpaste.com/21801/
On Mar 31, 3:06 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Vinicius Mendes | meiocodigo.com <
>
>
>
> vbmen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Look at this link:
>
> >http://code.django
3:35 pm, Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Vinicius Mendes wrote:
>
> > In the ticket description, the user says that he is using
> > inlineformset_factory, so do I. The changeset only fixes the FormSet.
> > ModelFormSet and InlineFormSet are
It seems to be ok! Thanks
On Mar 31, 4:59 pm, Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Vinicius Mendes | meiocodigo.com <
>
>
>
> vbmen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 3:35 pm, Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at
12 matches
Mail list logo
