On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Emil Stenström wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the second feature proposal as part of my general drive for getting
> Django to work better for javascript heavy sites.
>
> Support a javascript template language on the server
> --
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Finally, the only time we need Referer headers sent is for same origin
> requests (POST requests to be exact). Sending the Referer header in
> this case is virtually never a privacy concern, since the site will
> already be able to track wha
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:34 +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
>
>> Any sort of Referer checking is broken by design, since that header is
>> clearly optional. RFC 2616 makes explicitly clear that applications
>&
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Harro wrote:
> Authentication = verification
> Login = saving the authenticated user so we remember them.
>
> Putting login on the user model is a bad idea.
> That will only make the whole auth app less flexible than it already
> is.
> What if I have another model
The language code for Ukranian is uk:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry
Type: language
Subtag: uk
Description: Ukrainian
Added: 2005-10-16
Suppress-Script: Cyrl
UA is the country code for the Ukraine.
Cheers
Tom
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> Ol
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Waldemar Kornewald
> wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for the clarification. So, then the "bad batteries" part
>> in Eric's talk "Why Django sucks and how we can fix it" doesn't
>> receive much agreement within the
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Christophe Pettus wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> Right now, Django's auth system pretty much uses sha1 hardwired in
> (literally, in the case of User.set_password) for the hash. For a discussion
> of why a general-purpose hash function is not the best idea in the world f
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Christopher Petrilli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
>> First comment is that Django already has a pluggable authentication
>> stack, which already allows for this - simply define a new auth
>> backend that t
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
>
> During the original multi-db design process, we considered allowing
> for the definition of dependencies, but abandoned the idea because of
> the complexity required to get automated synchronization correct in
> every case. For exampl
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Andrew Godwin wrote:
> On 12/01/11 17:54, Daniel Swarbrick wrote:
>> Most of the time, I use POST for forms, but using GET is useful when
>> developing a search form, for example. This is especially true if you
>> want to paginate your results, because you still h
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Jari Pennanen wrote:
> On Jan 26, 6:56 pm, FeatherDark wrote:
>> Greetings huge django developer list,
>> I just wanted to mention, this method totally works for me, I call it
>> "Skinning"
>>
>> In the templates folder I have a file called "base.html'
>> Inside t
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> However, my concern here is that for any value of N, there will be
> some level of traffic that will render that N insufficient. I'm not
> fundamentally convinced that allowing N to be configurable will
> actually fix the problem. I'd b
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> If this sounds amenable, I can code up a patch for the ticket.
>
Indeed, I was piqued, so did it anyway. Running with it now.
Cheers
Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> The DB model for cache keys provides for 40 characters, so we can
> certainly store a UUID. If you can provide an implementation and can
> demonstrate that it won't be prone to key collisions and won't impose
> any computational limits
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> I've updated the ticket with a patch against trunk implementing uuid
> session keys
One of the reasons why it was coded like this was because you can not
tell the difference in the cache backend between a key collision and
mem
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Tim Graham wrote:
> Tom,
>
> That definitely seems reasonable to me. Seems like the risk of key
> collision is low enough that we shouldn't have to loop at all? My
> only concern regarding uui4 is the risk of collision with multiple web
> servers. From what I've
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Paul McMillan wrote:
> Sorry, I stuffed up some of the numbers.
>
> MD5 is 128 bits equivalent value. UUID4 is 113. A table with enough
> content to cause collisions for 10k input values would probably be in
> the exabyte range, but the point still stands. Cache ti
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Tonton wrote:
> maybe you still know that ! but some few weeks you change somethings on the
> docs.djangoproject.com 's search engine !
>
> and now all the time respons is no results found !
>
> regards
>
> tonton
>
http://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=template
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Vivek Narayanan wrote:
> ...
> In the run up to May 23rd, I'll be familiarizing myself with the
> codebase and community practices of Django, examining all the
> integration points and looking at the best practices of serialization.
>
> Week 1: I'll be implementing
2011/3/14 Juan Pablo Martínez :
> I dont think so.
> If I dont know the username and password I
> can also try username and password and wait for the system
> to send another different error message. then I get valid credentials.
This is one of my bug-bears with the current authentication system -
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Tai Lee wrote:
> If we're talking about the lowest common denominator and keeping
> things simple, this is what I think we'd have:
>
> myapp1/
> myapp2/
> myproject/
> -django.wsgi.sample
> -manage.py
> -management/
> --commands/
> ---myproject_mycommand.py.sample
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Carl Meyer wrote:
>
>
> On 03/18/2011 08:09 AM, Alexander Schepanovski wrote:
>> I think using subclass of User model for your fields has the same
>> flexibility as separate profile model (since you can have only one).
>
> You can have multiple subclasses of the Us
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Phui Hock wrote:
> On May 3, 7:43 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> This stems back to the design motivation of Django's template language
>> -- you shouldn't be doing math in the template. Instead, you should be
>> doing your math in the view, and providing the
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Daniel Moisset wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>>
>> From another POV, there is no chance for the designer to screw the
>> template up and calculate the wrong value, if he is only allowed to
>> output data.
>
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Jonathan Slenders
wrote:
>
> Like gettext, a seperate, dynamically generated javascript file for
> URL resolving is not scalable to lange web applications.
> And further, I think that the urls and names of views are not meant to
> be exposed to the client. I don't
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Michal Petrucha
wrote:
> As most of you have probably noticed by now, in a week and a half I'll
> start working on the implementation of composite fields. Before that
> we should probably agree on the final form of the API.
>
>
Hi Michal
This looks really, real
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Mateusz Harasymczuk
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been thinking about this for quite a long time.
> Can you make an error display page less verbose?
> I mean not to exclude those useful information, but to initially fold (hide)
> them.
> Fold those items:
> - Python path a
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
> In the new admin sorting UI, which now supports sorting on multiple
> fields, the behaviour can be described by the following two rules:
>
> 1. If you click on a header, it is made the primary sort field
> (with others moved down the list as n
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Florian Apolloner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jun 9, 1:11 pm, Gert Van Gool wrote:
>> I remember from the HTML5 doctype that some people (with app in enterprises)
>> need the support
>
> Right, but even Google is dropping support for IE < 8 [1]! And if
> Google is trying
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Jigar Tanna wrote:
> hey,
>
> I am new to Python and Django, was going through the concept of decorators
> where I came across a special case of using arguments with decorators
> Below is the code for memoization where I was looking at the concept...
>
> cache = {}
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Daniel Swarbrick
wrote:
> On Jun 29, 12:01 pm, Ryan McIntosh wrote:
>> Is that a crutch of your database? It isn't something I would ever live
>> with. All the *sql database servers I hate have an idea of what a
>> timestamp+offset is. Django should leverage th
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Daniel Swarbrick
wrote:
> I personally find it relatively useless to know what the wall clock
> time was when something happened in another timezone.
Right, but this isn't DanielsWebFramework, we need to cover more than
what you find personally useful.
Maybe what
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Paul Miller wrote:
> Hi Yuri,
>
> I have not tested them for speed, but:
>
> - Named tuples have no instance dictionary, so their instances take no more
> space than a regular tuple (for example, casting thousands of sql records to
> named tuples has zero memory
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
> On 10/07/11 22:26, Chris Beaven wrote:
>> To clarify, didn't even notice we were talking about models.Field, I'm
>> +0 for a 'strip' attribute on the form's field, nothing on the model.
>
> Like Chris, I don't think we can put this feature anyw
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have created a ModelField called RealIPAddressField.
> It stores the IP address in integer form, meaning the lookups on large
> tables are much faster:
> http://djangosnippets.org/snippets/2493/
> @django-develope
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
wrote:
>
> +1 on this idea :)
I don't think Russell is looking for votes on whether to do it, he's
looking for someone to actually do it :)
Cheers
Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
Hi all
Currently, if a view throws an exception, the middleware classes that
have a process_exception method will be called in reverse order to see
if one of them can handle it and return a valid response before
django's default exception handling takes over.
This doesn't hold true for middleware
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Alec Taylor wrote:
> Looks useable.
>
> Anyone interested in working with me to port this to DJango?
Alec, as other people have mentioned, Django is not Drupal. Drupal is
a web application that can be customized using plugins, where as
Django is a python library on
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Roald de Vries wrote:
>
> I don't see how this is different from the create method on the intermediary
> model.
>
> Cheers, Roald
>
> PS: I found an open ticket on this,
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9475
>
Here is the function definition for add() on re
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> I'm happy to be proved wrong, of course. Apache is very popular, though,
> so if its hard in Apache, it could be said to be hard full stop.
>
RequestHeader unset X-Forwarded-Protocol
Not precisely what I'd call hard.
>From a-business-that
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Wilfred Hughes
wrote:
> It would be really good if we could improve the errors provided when
> Django can't do reverse().
>
> For example:
>
> >>> reverse('i_dont_exist')
> NoReverseMatch: Reverse for 'i_dont_exist' with arguments '()' and
> keyword argument
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Wilfred Hughes
wrote:
> 1. Can we provide an example of a pattern containing "|" that doesn't
> work? I've successfully reversed the pattern r'^fruit/(bananas|apples)
> $' above.
Any regexp with alternation that is not part of a captured parameter:
url(r'^homepag
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> Am 23.10.2011 21:59, schrieb feel:
>> Hi, I wanted to propose a new possible feature in Django project that
>> allows to sync the local folder with the remote one of the server
>> defining all the configuration directly in settings.py.
>>
>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Marco Paolini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to add a small note of warning about queryset caching in dos,
> in topics/db/queries.txt "Caching and QuerySets" section,
> something like:
>
> Keep in mind when looping through a queryset and altering data that
> might
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Marco Paolini wrote:
> it's a bit more complex: there are basically two phases:
> 1) row fetching from db using cursor.fetchmany()
> 2) model instance creation in queryset
>
> both are delayed as much as possible (queryset lazyness)
>
> phase two (model instance
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Marco Paolini wrote:
> mysql can do chunked row fetching from server, but only one row at a time
>
> curs = connection.cursor(CursorUseResultMixIn)
> curs.fetchmany(100) # fetches 100 rows, one by one
>
> Marco
>
The downsides to mysql_use_result over mysql_store_
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Marco Paolini wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 17:12, Tom Evans wrote:
>> If you do a database query that quickly returns a lot of rows from the
>> database, and each row returned from the database requires long
>> processing in django, and you use m
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Javier Guerra Giraldez
wrote:
> this seems to be the case with MyISAM tables; on the InnoDB engine
> docs, it says that SELECT statements don't set any lock, since it
> reads from a snapshot of the table.
>
> on MyISAM, there are (clumsy) workarounds by forcing the
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ric wrote:
> this is my proposition to have custom data inside a model field
>
> a json data field, the code is simple as this, and it works with
> lastest django release
>
The problem with something like this is that it is rarely a good idea
to stick opaque data
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Ric wrote:
> django should be able to handle this kind of situation, and please
> don't be arrogant.
Hi, I'm sorry you felt that I was being arrogant - I don't know the
situations of your project, it may well be exactly what is needed in
that situation.
I was only
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Torsten Bronger
wrote:
>
> While I appreciate that Django core is supposed to enforce good
> design practices, one must be careful with that if some practice may
> have valid use cases. You cannot prevent the user from shooting in
> the foot anyway.
>
> While we m
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Doug Ballance wrote:
> I very much like the idea of an optional keyword argument and
> fallback. The template loader is one of the few places I've been
> forced to use threadlocals to get get the job done.
>
Please no - an optional argument is all well and good, u
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Florian Apolloner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:43:01 AM UTC+1, Tom Evans wrote:
>>
>> Please no - an optional argument is all well and good, until people
>>
>> I don't get why it is difficult to extrac
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 06:54 -0700, Adrian Rogers wrote:
> On Jun 9, 11:09 am, Tom Evans wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I was struggling to turn a typical template dictionary iteration use
> > case into a sorted dictionary iteration, and struggling to find any way
>
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:37 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Tom Evans
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 06:54 -0700, Adrian Rogers wrote:
> > On Jun 9, 11:09 am, Tom Evans
>
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:30 -0400, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Tom Evans
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I appreciate that; I'm asking if this undocumented feature is
> expected
> to work for the fores
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 04:48 +0700, Yuri Baburov wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> SortedDict(yourdict) is a hard thing and takes a lot of tinkering?
> don't you have python 2.4 to use sorted(dict.iteritems())?
> can't write your own python function to do this in your views side?
>
> next, |dictsort:"0" is wo
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:12 -0700, Rodrigue wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I came across a behaviour that somewhat surprised me on the model
> fields. Namely, if you have a Field with no default value, an empty
> value for that field is likely to be turned into the empty string by
> Field.get_default.
>
>
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:26 -0700, andybak wrote:
> Nice!
>
> Are you planning to do anything to finesse the behaviour of the
> 'delete' button? It would be nice (especially on selector inlines) if
> it looked like items disappeared immediately.
>
> I also feel the admin change pages needs a 'ca
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 09:45 +0100, Andy Baker wrote:
> Mmmm. That's a fair point but that article was written before web
> applications were so application-ey and expectations may well have
> changed. (I've noticed a lot of semi-modal dialogs in web apps
> complete with 'cancel' buttons and with j
Hi all
A while ago, I added support for testing if an element is in a list to
the 'if' template tag. The diff is attached to ticket 8087, complete
with unit tests and documentation.
Could a committer take a look at this change, and advise me what
additional work/changes would be required in orde
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Jorge C. Leitão
wrote:
> Django allows users to define handlers to some exceptions, most notably
> http404, server error (status 500) and permission denied (status 403).
>
In fact, django already allows you to install handlers to process any
kind of unhandled exce
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Some Developer
wrote:
> On 21/07/2013 05:08, Curtis Maloney wrote:
>>
>> I wasn't aware there was a particular performance issue, but I'll
>> certainly keep it in mind.
>
>
> Take a look at this:
>
> http://www.peterbe.com/plog/fcgi-vs-gunicorn-vs-uwsgi
>
> I've pr
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Wim Lewis wrote:
>
> On 30 Jul 2013, at 2:06 PM, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>> How do you think such support would look like? For negative indices you'd
>> have to know the size of the resultset to be able to do "limit somthing
>> offset length-your_negative_index
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Loic Bistuer wrote:
> In your example "print qs[0]" evaluates a *clone* of "qs", not "qs" itself.
>
> Therefore "qs[0]; qs[-1]; qs[0]" triggers 3 queries, just like "qs[0]; qs[0];
> qs[0]" would.
>
Fine, be pedantic:
qs = ...
print len(qs)
print qs[0]
print qs[0
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Loic Bistuer wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
>> qs = ...
>> print len(qs)
>> print qs[0]
>> print qs[-1]
>> print qs[0]
>>
>> How many queries for this?
>
> Just one and "qs[-1]&
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Curtis Maloney
wrote:
> I started working on a CacheManager for dealing with thread local cache
> instances, as was suggested on IRC by more than one person.
>
The problem that Florian identified was that recreating cache
instances each time get_cache() was calle
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Florian Apolloner
wrote:
> The main issue here isn't recreating the objects on demand, but the impact
> they have, eg a new memcached connection. Now imagine a complex system where
> each part issues get_cache('something') to get the cache
On the other hand each c
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Florian Apolloner
wrote:
>> It seems more sensible to hook something that has the lifetime of the
>> request to the request, rather than stick it in TLS, keyed to the
>> thread serving the request.
>
>
> Jupp, sadly I don't see a sensible way around thread local st
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen
wrote:
> On 09/20/2013 06:29 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Florian Apolloner
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It seems more sensible to hook something that has the lifetime of the
>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Andres Osinski
wrote:
> Honestly, I find the idea of *not* using a settings file to be inconvenient,
> and the notion of using environment variables for doing anything aside from
> pointing to a settings file to be pretty disgusting.
+1
The idea that before you s
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Tino de Bruijn wrote:
> To all of you who don't see benefit in putting certain (definitely not all!)
> settings in the environment, I would like to say: try it. It will finally
> make sense that you set DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE in the first place. I never
> understood
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Ramiro Morales wrote:
> Now that specs like WSGI exist there is no point in going back one decade
> implementing interfaces to cater for one particular web server integration
> implementation.
Is that any worse than where we are now, using an interface that only
a
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, parisrocks
wrote:
> Hi Django Users,
> I tried Django recently and really liked the simplistic approach for
> building sites.
> But there's no official support for NoSQL databases like Cassandra or
> MongoDB, there's a great community of NoSQL users waiting for an
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Tom Evans wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, parisrocks
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Waiting for official Django ORM support for NoSql databases.
>>
>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Devashish Badlani wrote:
> Sir,
>
>
> Sample projects with the updated Django 1.6.2,use of latest modules in each
> of them and an helpful documentaion ,would certainly enhance the value of
> DjangoBook is what I feel
>
How would this work? The book currently admo
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Paulo Poiati wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> While developing standard web applications one thing I frequently do is
> updating just one field of a model instance and save it after that. The best
> way to do that today (if you want to avoid the update in all the fields
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Christian Schmitt
wrote:
> This is already merged.
>
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/topics/db/models/#multi-table-inheritance
>
MTI is not STI, nor is it polymorphic.
Cheers
Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Please revert this change as soon as possible.
If the project has become so PC sensitive that the word "slave" is no
longer permitted to be uttered, then "replica" is an alternate term,
but "primary" is not.
Have you ever set up "primary-primary replication"? No, neither have
I. Master-master rep
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Justin Holmes wrote:
> I don't want to devolve completely into an etymological circlejerk here, but
> my sense is that "master" in the VCS sense is like "master key," rather than
> describing the interpersonal relationship of involuntary servitude.
>
And in databas
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Justin Holmes wrote:
> OK. How about "canon" and "replica" ?
I think we all get sent to the naughty step if we continue to discuss
this, so I will just say that "master" is being used as an adjective
in this context, it is the master database, or the master connec
Google "django-development unsettings". It's been discussed at length on list.
Cheers
Tom
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Andy Baker wrote:
> This sounds really interesting. Is there anything about this in writing? I'm
> not a fan of listening to audio on tech subjects (must... skim... read...
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Benjamin Scherrey
wrote:
> I don't believe the functionality is backwards incompatible at all unless
> I'm missing something. The new behavior of automatically selecting the
> optimal search field (prioritized by pk first then by any discovered field
> marked as u
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Pkl wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I once was once lured to an ideal of long-term stability and
> retrocompatibility, by nice docs like this one :
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/misc/api-stability/
>
> But for some years, stuffs have actually been getting worse and
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> 2014-09-02 15:33 GMT+02:00 Tom Evans :
>
>> this story was scored
>> at 8 points, it took a junior developer much longer than 8 points and
>> wasn't finished in a single sprint - and 1.3->1.4 was *easy*
>
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Poorbahrdew .poorbahrdew
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I know, this is a quite old thread, but recently I had the same issue with
> these decorators for the same reason: how to handle 405 responses in user
> friendly way?
>
> I have found a simple solution which doesn't re
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> 2015-09-07 10:00 GMT+02:00 Yann Fouillat :
>> I agree, do you know what tools could I use to emulate 3G ?
>
> As far as I know, the canonical tools are:
>
> - on Linux, netem:
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networki
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Xavier Palacín Ayuso
wrote:
> I want to collects current user in model signal pre_save, to prevent remove
> super user permission to current super users.
Hi Xavier. This mailing list is for discussing the development of
django itself, not for discussing how to deve
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Paulo Maciel
wrote:
> +1 max_length optional
>
I'm slightly worried from a DB point of view. Whilst blessed
PostgreSQL supports variable length fields seemingly without issues,
other DB engines (MySQL, for instance), have significant performance
issues using a TEX
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Podrigal, Aron
wrote:
> Different schemas?? Schema will always be different for each database
> backend according to its datatypes. I really don't understand what your
> concern is. In any case your free to specify a max_length=N where it will be
> the same for all
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, guettli wrote:
> API proposal:
>
> Add a new kwarg to reverse():
>
>reverse(..., get=None)
>
>
> Example: reverse('my_view_name', kwargs={'pk': '1'}, get=dict(param='value')
Would 'get' be a dict or a querydict? (URL parameters can be repeated,
dict keys cann
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Raphaël Barrois
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> The core of the proposed solution seems quite interesting; however, it also
> introduces a new configuration format for backends.
>
> Caches and databases use a dict with a "BACKEND" key and an "OPTIONS" dict
> for kwargs to
Is this opt-{in,out} considered to be a global flag, meant to be
toggled on or off depending on whether it is an "expert" working on
the project or not?
I don't think that would be a good idea, almost all of our projects
have a mix of skill levels, and people move from team to team on a
regular ba
Short answer: always use the appropriate tool
Relational databases and document stores have different uses and
purposes. Using a document store like a relational database (eg, with
an ORM (emphasis on the R)) is a bad idea, and using a relational
database as a document store is similarly foolish.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Nes Dis wrote:
> I would like to thank everyone for their valuable comments. Simultaneously I
> would like to comment on some conceptions regarding using MongoDB. Its not
> accurate to state that relational joins cannot happen in MongoDB. It can be
> done at the ap
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Robert Roskam wrote:
> I realize this is a really, really obvious and easily fixed newbie error.
> But here it is:
>
> urlpatterns = [
> url(r'^sitemap/',
> TemplateView.as_view(template_name='brochure/sitemap.html'),
> name="sitemap"),
> # More urls
> ]
>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Thomas Turner wrote:
> Hi
>
> The other day I raise a ticket to do with ALLOWED_HOSTS and it was suggested
> that I post on this group before creating a patch
> The ticket is https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27485
>
> The problem
>
> Now that Django 1.10.3 fo
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Florian Apolloner
wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:07:07 PM UTC+1, Tom Evans wrote:
>>
>> Or:
>> from socket import gethostname, gethostbyname
>> ALLOWED_HOSTS = [ gethostname(), gethostbyname(gethostname()), ]
>
>
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Asif Saifuddin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> django 2.0 will be released in december 2017 and ubuntu 18.04 will be
> released in april 2018 which will default atleast 3.6, so I think this
> should also be taken as consideration while deciding.
I know supporting endless versions
Also django-two-factor, which builds on django-otp and provides all
extra bits you might need, eg setup views, QR code generation for
device registration, login wizards etc supporting HOTP/TOTP, static
tokens, Yubikey and SMS.
https://markusholtermann.eu/2016/09/2-factor-authentication-in-django/
101 - 200 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
