Re: Support for ON DELETE and ON UPDATE in foreign keys

Hi Mike, > If I can determine that there is sufficient interest that there's a > decent chance of it being used (always assuming the implementation is > found acceptable, of course), I'll definitely work on it. +1 This feature would be very nice to have. Thanks! Sander --~--~-~--~--

Re: On aggregates

Hi, > DISTINCT and GROUP BY are both annotating the results. Taking many > rows, and turning them into a single row based on a key. DISTINCT would > be the same as GROUP BY every, field, in, the, select. Mathematically true, but I think having two separate concepts makes the code easier to read