Re: [ANN] Database Backend for SQL Anywhere available

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Nathan Auch [Sybase] wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that a SQL Anywhere database backend for Django > is publicly available from: > > http://code.google.com/p/sqlany-django > > The backend is currently only supported against Django 1.0.2. I'll take > care of

Re: ANNOUNCE:- ibm_db_django - IBM Dataservers backend support for Django Application Framework.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Tarun Pasrija wrote: > > IBM DB2 backend support for Django application Framework is now > available to the community. Right now it is in beta stage. > > ibm_db_django enables access to IBM databases from Django > applications > http://www.djangoproject.com/ > > Th

Re: [ANN] Database Backend for SQL Anywhere available

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Nathan Auch [Sybase] wrote: > > >> Open a ticket requesting this so the idea isn't forgotten. If you can >> work up a patch that contains some draft text, feel free to push the >> ticket onto the v1.1 milestone. >> >> If you're going to write some draft text, keep

Re: New django.shortcuts methods: get_object/list_or_404

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Chuck Harmston wrote: > Hello everyone! > I recently posted a patch that adds two methods to django.shortcuts: > get_list_or_none() and get_object_or_none(). These function identically to > their get _x_or_404 cousins, with one exception: they return empty QuerySe

Re: [New Feature In Admin] Added Edit-Icon in selection widget of ForeignKey and ManyToMany Fields(Relationship fields).

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Dharmesh Patel wrote: > Hello! > > I added a new feature to edit selected item in selection widget of > relationship fields like a FireignKey and ManyToMany fields. > > You can see SVN diff file here : http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11397 Hi Dharmesh Thank

Re: [gsoc2009-testing] Windmill Runners Kicking it up a Notch

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Kevin Kubasik wrote: > Should windmill tests default to non-isolated/non-transactional DB behavior? > Basically, we are providing the means for functional tests, these should be > tests like 'Register and Complete a Profile', then 'Edit Profile'. We don't > want th

Re: [gsoc2009-testing] Windmill Runners Kicking it up a Notch

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Kevin Kubasik wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Kevin Kubasik wrote: >> > Should windmill tests default to non-isolated/non-transactional DB >

Re: django doc improvement suggestion

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Amit Upadhyay wrote: > Further, its difficult to locate information about generic relations on any > of the following pages: > > http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ > http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/models/#topics-db-models > http://docs.djangoproje

Re: Cannot access admin site after update

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Diogo Baeder wrote: > > Hi, guys, > > Got this after updating my django trunk working copy to r.11199, and > cannot access the admin site anymore: > > http://dpaste.com/63968/ > > Any ideas of what it might be? If you are looking for help debugging a problem, plea

Re: Problem with admin after moving to another machine

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Diogo Baeder wrote: > > Hi there, > > I started to have this error: > http://dpaste.com/64355/ > while trying to access my admin site, after I moved my website from one > machine (my desktop) to the other (my laptop). I already restored my > PostgreSQL database, an

Re: Performance regression loading from fixtures in 1.1 & trunk

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:00 AM, David Turner wrote: > > I have created a test that does nothing but read in a fixture of 1 > items. > http://novalis.org/bugs/perf.zip I'd love to help out here, but it is 142 bytes in size, and when I unpack it, all I get is an empty directory. > It goes sig

Re: Tests for TestCase

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Andrew Fong wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm working on a tweak to django.test.TestCase, my first attempt at > contributing to Django. I've been searching for existing tests of > django.test.TestCase (not tests that use django.test.TestCase, but a > test that verifies th

Re: Django 1.1

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Michael Kerrin wrote: > Hi All, > > I am working on a project that is currently running Django 1.1Beta from > March 23rd. > I am enquiring about the road map for the Django 1.1 release as I have not > seen much talk on the mailing list (I don't pay much attention t

Re: request.session.reload()

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Zachary Voase wrote: > > Hi Developers, >    I know this feature request might be a little late in the > development process, so I’m sorry about that. The idea is to add a > reload() method to SessionBase, so that the session data can be > reloaded from it’s stora

Re: OneToManyField?

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Jonas Obrist wrote: > > In the documentation I see that there are Many-To-One Fields, > Many-To-Many Fields and One-To-One Fields. What about a One-To-Many > Field? You might now say that this is completely pointless since a > Many-To-One Field reversed is basical

Re: to save modified version of contents

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Ali Rıza KELEŞ wrote: > Hi, > > I have a model which keeps texts, dates, author, etc.. something like a > clasical content model. > > I want to allow admins to save modified versions of these contents. If > possible in another db table like this: > > ... > same tab

Re: OneToManyField?

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:05 PM, dan wrote: > >> >> If a model A has a foreign key on model B, then the table for A >> requires a field to track the relation. However, if model B has a >> "many to one" on A table A requires a field. > > sorry, can you clarify that for me? - specifically: "mode

Re: Assigning to a model attribute with F()

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Zachary Voase wrote: > > I just found out that a particular Django ORM trick [1] seems to work > just fine but is undocumented. > > Could I ask what the official status is with regards to this ‘trick’? > Is it intentional? Also, since there isn’t any documentation

Re: Permissions independent of models

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Júlio Cesar wrote: > > Hey, Guys, > > There are some permissions that I would like to add in my project, > associated with acess a some views, particularly. > > But, there's no a clean mode to do this, because all permissions are > associated with ContentTypes, rig

Re: Why are checkboxes *still* like this?

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:53 AM, judgej wrote: > > > http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/forms/widgets.py > line 595: > output.append(u'%s %s' % (label_for, > rendered_cb, option_label)) > > 1- I know there is argument in the CSS/designer community about > embedding tags ins

Re: Filter on is-a test

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Forest Bond wrote: > Hi, > > I have a simple implementation that allows filtering based on whether or not a > particular row represents an instance of a particular model class.  This is > only > useful with concrete model inheritance. > > For example: > >  class

Re: Two simple to fix bugs in 1.1 RC

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Anssi Kaariainen wrote: > > Hello all, > > 1) > > If using postgresql with autocommit = True, and a postgresql version > that supports autocommit, first save of a model will fail if it is the > first query ran. ("ProgrammingError: no results to fetch"). > > The pro

Re: 1.1rc1 - KeyError in debug.py in technical_404_response

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:47 PM, John P. Speno wrote: > > Hi, > > Running Django 1.1rc1 via wsgi. Here's the stdout including the > request that raised the exception: > > 125.65.165.139 - - [26/Jul/2009 23:02:46] "GET > http://pv.wantsfly.com/prx.php?hash=65B15474B46964654834EDB41F4020883D0D9A08F7

Re: code style and external library

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Charlie DeTar wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm writing a reusable Django app that interfaces with a standalone > javascript library, which I hope eventually to submit for inclusion in > Django.  I've run into a conundrum: the javascript library uses mixed > case naming (like

Re: code style and external library

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Charlie DeTar wrote: > > Russell Keith-Magee wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Charlie DeTar wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm writing a reusable Django app that interfaces with a standalone >>> java

Re: code style and external library

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Luke Plant wrote: > > On Monday 27 July 2009 02:12:07 Charlie DeTar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm writing a reusable Django app that interfaces with a standalone >> javascript library, which I hope eventually to submit for inclusion >> in Django.  I've run into a conund

Re: [RFC] Input support to admin-actions

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Adys wrote: > > Hello, > > Now 1.2 is released I have a couple of long-standing issues I'd like > some feedback on. I'm not sure that 3 months counts as "long standing" in a project with open tickets that are three years old, but OK :-) > First one for now, w

Re: Ticket 3090 - multi-tag template tags

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Daniel Ring wrote: > > Partly pasted from http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3090 - a trivial > reordering in template.Parser.parse to allow inner template tags to take > parameters, something like 'parser.parse_until(('case', 'endswitch'))' where > the 'case

Re: DB Fields: reserved_names

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Jonas Obrist wrote: > > I tried to add support for an opposite of 'choices' to DB Fields (namely > CharField) but failed horribly. I still think that would be a nice > feature so I thought I'd bring this to this group. Maybe someone can > implement this. What I ha

Re: Feature request: admin notifications

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Peter Herndon wrote: > > On 07/29/2009 05:05 AM, Daniel Pope wrote: >> My suggestion is a system for administrators to be notified about >> specific model instances about which they need to take action. At >> present administrators have to identify where to make c

Re: Custom captcha

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:16 PM, gabon wrote: > > I'm evaluating the, probably crazy, idea to build a custom captcha, to > have it more related to the website. I created a subclass of > forms.CharField where on creation I choose the random content and > show, for testing purposes, a related label.

Re: [GSOC] Altering the signature of Field.db_type and Field.get_db_prep_*

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > Hey all, > > In the process of my work on adding multi-db support to Django it has > become necessary to alter the signatures of Field.db_type and > Field.get_db_prep_(save, value, lookup). Putting in my 2c as Alex's mentor on this project:

Re: [GSOC] Altering the signature of Field.db_type and Field.get_db_prep_*

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Russell >> Keith-Magee wrote: >>> Of course, Alex and I may have missed an obvious alternative solution >>

Re: [GSOC] Altering the signature of Field.db_type and Field.get_db_prep_*

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > > Hi Alex, Russ -- > > I see some good pros and cons of each your suggestions. Just to throw > some more fuel on the fire, though, I've got an idea of my own: > > I tend to slightly favor introspection to identify old-style fields -- > it

Re: Cache DB backend

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Fraser Nevett wrote: > > I was looking at the database cache backend and noticed a number of of > things that might be worth improving... > >  * The "createcachetable" management command manually constructs and > executes SQL to create the table. This is seems a bi

Re: Feeds as views.

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:37 PM, zellyn wrote: > > [Hi folks. This is a re-post, now that 1.1 has been released.] > > Django's contrib.syndication app feels different from normal views, > using a dictionary and dispatching by slug, then finding objects by > splitting the rest of the URL into "bits"

Re: Logging instead of connection.queries

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ivan Sagalaev wrote: > > Hello! > > A couple of days ago a sudden thought has struck me while thinking on > the matter of logging in Python libraries. I consider a good practice > for a library to log what it's doing into a named logger without setting > up logging

Re: Feeds as views.

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Ben Firshman wrote: > > > On 3 Aug 2009, at 14:50, Alex Gaynor wrote: >> >> Ben Firshman has written similar code that is backwards compatible >> with the current implementation: >> http://github.com/bfirsh/syndication-view/tree/master >> >> Alex > > I started going

Re: #8087: Adding support for lists to the template if tag

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > > Hi all > > A while ago, I added support for testing if an element is in a list to > the 'if' template tag. The diff is attached to ticket 8087, complete > with unit tests and documentation. > > Could a committer take a look at this change, and a

Re: Template Caching

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Mike Malone wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I've been working on a patch for Django that would allow you to optionally > cache templates after they've been lexed and parsed (compiled) by the > template engine. I've got things far enough along that I have a working > impl

Re: Web services / Rest Interfce

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Uolter wrote: > > What I would like to have in the next Django rel is a better support > to web services and rest api. > > I am using now the django-rest-interface, but I don't find it very > flexible. For instance I can have the xsd descriptor automatically to > ex

Re: 1.2 Proposal: Add a few more tutorial steps

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Rob Hudson wrote: >> I'd be happy to help flesh out one or more of these.  This isn't >> necessarily a 1.2 feature but would be a nice addition to the >> documentation. > > I am *always* looking to impro

Re: 1.2 Proposal: Add a few more tutorial steps

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bryan Veloso wrote: > > On Aug 8, 9:51 am, Dave Jeffery wrote: > >> Just a quick note that I would be happy to help out with this area of the >> docs too. > > Same here. Should we create a wiki page to coordinate this? I suggest using Trac. If you want to propose

Re: Form option, that would render asterisks for required field

2009/8/10 Filip Gruszczyński : > > Hi everyone! > > Putting asterisks after a required field is a common practice. To > achieve I use right now a filter that is invoked after every form > field in a template. This isn't very convenient, but I haven't found > any better solution yet. > > I wonder i

Re: App Engine support

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Waldemar Kornewald > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> now that 1.1 is out we can finally discuss App Engine support. Is >> anyone planning to work on this feature or working on it for real or >> are there just announceme

Re: App Engine support

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 07:55 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Waldemar Kornewald >> > wrote: &g

Re: App Engine support

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 05:19 -0700, Waldemar Kornewald wrote: >> Hi, >> now that 1.1 is out we can finally discuss App Engine support. Is >> anyone planning to work on this feature or working on it for real or >> are there just announc

Re: 1.2 Proposal: django debug toolbar in contrib

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Mat Clayton wrote: > Hey all, > > For us of the most useful developments in the django community recently has > been the django debug toolbar. > > http://github.com/robhudson/django-debug-toolbar/tree/master/debug_toolbar > > This seems to be branching and growing

Re: Proposal: Support for HTTP PATCH method

Hi Krzysztof On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Krzysztof Jurewicz < krzysztof.jurew...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a RFC describing HTTP method named PATCH: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/**rfc5789 > > Quoting that RFC: > “ The difference between the PUT and

Re: Proposal: implement Postgres CLUSTER USING by default for MtM tables

Hi Bryce, An interesting idea. How are you proposing that this feature be exposed as an API? Is there any reason that this couldn't be handled as a DB-admin operation? i.e., Django just does what it normally does, and if a DB admin notices that table clustering is a problem, they apply the cluste

Re: Passing parameters to raw()

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Roman Klesel wrote: > Hello, > > > the docs say: > > """ > Passing parameters into raw() > > If you need to perform parameterized queries, you can use the params > argument to raw(): > > >>> lname = 'Doe' > >>> Person.objects.raw('SELECT * FROM myapp_person WHERE l

Re: Proposal: Support for HTTP PATCH method

Hi Krzysztof, Thanks for that patch -- I've just merged it to trunk. Yours, Russ Magee %-) On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Krzysztof Jurewicz < krzysztof.jurew...@gmail.com> wrote: > W dniu 21.05.2013 14:38, Russell Keith-Magee pisze: > > These are all reasonable and

Re: selecting app for syncdb

Hi Michał, The short answer is "inter-application dependencies". For example, if one application has a foreign key on a second application, and you only synchronise the first application, you won't be able to set up any foreign key constraints on the first application. If you use the project in t

Re: Passing parameters to raw()

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:19 PM, VernonCole wrote: > > Officially (according to PEP-249) you are not supposed to be able to do > that (pass a dictionary of parameters), but PostgreSQL does it as an > extension to the spec. > Are you sure about this? http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/#par

Re: Proposal: better support for generating rest apis in django core

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Shai Berger wrote: > Hi Karol, > > On Saturday 18 May 2013 13:26:53 Karol Sikora wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We was talked with Russell on djangocon eu about integrating more rich > > support for working django as rest api provider, focused on dealing with > > one-page

Re: Proposal/Discussion: url and template search using the directory structure of apps within django sites

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Jorge C. Leitão wrote: > Hi there. > > Django allows the possibility of putting apps within apps to improve > structure of the code and increase portability. I find this absolutely > genial. > > However, I find this feature quite limited by 2 key issues that are no

Re: Migrations, commands and syncdb

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Andrew Godwin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm starting to plan out the commands for the new migrations stuff in > Django, and I've hit something of an impasse trying to decide which option > to go for. > > Short background: South modified syncdb to just sync non-mig

Re: Not calling things twice in templates

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Daniele Procida wrote: > The for ... empty pattern in templates is common and useful: < > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/templates/builtins/#for-empty> > > But this is another common pattern: > > {% if my_bonnet.bees %} > > {% for bee in my_

Re: Not calling things twice in templates

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Shai Berger wrote: > On Monday 03 June 2013, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > Alternatively, add new sub tags to {% for %}: > > > > {% for bee in my_bonnet.bees %} > > {% pre %} > > > > {% body %} > > {{ bee }} >

Re: [GSoC] Revamping validation framework and merging django-secure once again

Hi Chris, On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Christopher Medrela < chris.medr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! > > **Making distinction between form validation and static validation.** I > named > the process of static checks of apps, models etc. "validation". > Unfortunately, > novices may confuse it

Re: Circularly dependent fixtures fail with Postgres 9.2

Circular dependencies *shouldn't* be a problem on PostgreSQL because all constraints are set DEFERABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED; that means no constrain checks should be performed are performed until the transaction boundary, so all circular references shouldn't be a problem. Ticket #3615 exists because

Possible future compatibility naming conflict with checksetup command

Hi all (but especially Daniel) I've got a quick question about a recent commit and some naming consequences that I think we need to sort out before we cut the 1.6 beta. tl;dr - I think we either need to rename the recently added checksetup command, or do some light refactoring of it's internals s

Re: Django generated admindocs

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Stryder Crown wrote: > Couple questions maybe someone can elucidate... > > When Model docs are generated, why are only methods that take no arguments > (save self) documented? > Because admindocs isn't documenting the models. It's a resource for templates. It lis

Re: Possible future compatibility naming conflict with checksetup command

sensus, I'm happy to change it (or help (or > get out of the way)). > > > Daniel > > > > > On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 1:34:54 AM UTC-7, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: >> >> Hi all (but especially Daniel) >> >> I've got a quick question about a

Re: MAC adddres field

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Patryk Ściborek wrote: > W dniu środa, 26 czerwca 2013 17:26:12 UTC+2 użytkownik Carl Meyer napisał: > > >> Do you have any new information to justify why the existing resolution >> of #2239 should be reconsidered? >> >> I think the existing resolution is correct.

Re: Missing timezone support in built-in time template filter

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Warren Smith wrote: > Is anyone aware of a reason why the built-in time template filter does not > have timezone support? The built-in date template filter has timezone > support, but I wanting to use the TIME_FORMAT default stuff linked to the > time filter. > >

Re: Circularly dependent fixtures fail with Postgres 9.2

If you can confirm that the problem exists on 1.6, but doesn't exist on 1.5, then yes, it is a release blocker. However, as I understand, you were reporting the same problem in 1.5. If it's the same problem, or a different error rising from the same root cause, then no, it isn't a release blocker.

Re: Missing timezone support in built-in time template filter

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Warren Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < > russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > >> >> I can see how what you're describing is a problem, and as far as I can >> make out, you haven't m

Re: ANNOUNCE: Django 1.6 beta 1 released

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Aymeric Augustin < aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote: > On 29 juin 2013, at 20:35, Hannu Krosing wrote: > > > Is there any hope to get https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6148 > > integrated int 1.6 ? > > > > This is about using schemas in databases whic

Re: Missing timezone support in built-in time template filter

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Warren Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < > russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > >> >> A third approach would be a new setting, for AWARE_TIME_FORMAT that would >>>> only get used if you pass

Re: Proposal: rename django-developers to django-contributors

Allow me to confirm this. Search through the archives; this suggestion has been made several times in the past. Essentially, it comes down to the fact that you can't solve a social problem with technology. No matter what name we choose, *someone* will be able to misinterpret that name to mean "Oh,

Re: Regarding 3D model in Django

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:05 PM, John wrote: > On 09/07/13 12:31, James Bennett wrote: > > This list is for discussion of the development of Django itself. For > > discussion of how to use Django, please see the django-users mailing > list. > One day when I have nothing else to do[1] I will see h

Re: Adding a OneToMany Relationship to Django

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Curtis Maloney wrote: > I've seen enough people in #django suffering because they need a FKey on a > table they simply can't alter -- be it because it's in a 3rd party app, or > simply a table their DBA won't permit them to alter, or what have you. > > In the end t

Re: Explaining application instances

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Daniele Procida wrote: > There are a couple of places in the documentation that refer to > "application instances": > > > < > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/admin/#multiple-a

Re: Spam on ticket #542

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Aymeric Augustin < aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote: > Hello, > > For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that > bypassed Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and > deleting it manually gets tedious after 100 mess

Re: Deprecate FCGI support in Django 1.7

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Curtis Maloney wrote: > As much as I recognise FastCGI is pretty much a dead technology in the > Python world, for people stuck with cPanel sites like HostGator, it still > appears to be, pretty much, the only option. > > And installing uWSGI there is simply not

Re: Deprecate FCGI support in Django 1.7

t 1:04 PM, Michael Manfre wrote: > Has anyone thought to contact HostGator and see how they would react to > Django dropping FastCGI and/or whether they would be willing to support a > WSGI option. > > Regards, > Michael Manfre > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Rus

Re: Revisiting multiline tags

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Daniel Ellis wrote: > My grandfather was a developer in a nuclear plant that I was interning at. > They used a Django-based web interface for internal operations. > > One of the functions their Django application managed was the release of > nuclear material. Wh

Re: Hybrid Property request

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Luis Francisco Jesus Masuelli Bonanni < endless.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > A feature I would really appreciate (as devs in > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12217763/does-django-orm-have-an-equivalent-to-sqlalchemys-hybrid-attribute, > at least) is the Hybrid Prop

Re: [GSoC] Revamping validation framework and merging django-secure once again

Hi Chris, On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Christopher Medrela < chris.medr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Finally, I've rewritten all model and field tests and checks. Some new > tests > were written. First draft of checking framework documentation was written. > All > tests passes (at least at my compu

Re: [GSoC] Revamping validation framework and merging django-secure once again

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Christopher Medrela < chris.medr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Progress: I've implemented manager checks. > > The schedule for the next 4 weeks is: > > 1. Manager checks (ref 4.1.7)(done)(0.5 week). > 2. Entry point registering (ref 4.1.5) & rewriting mechanism of trigger

Re: Deprecate FCGI support in Django 1.7

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Some Developer wrote: > On 14/07/13 20:17, Florian Apolloner wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to get rid of everything FCGI-specific in Django sooner or >> later (rather sooner). Flup isn't maintained since a long time and there >> is no ticket tracker to report stu

Re: Deprecate FCGI support in Django 1.7

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Some Developer wrote: > On 22/07/13 05:47, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > >> Based on the feedback from this thread (and the fact that multiple core >> devs, including a BDFL have weighed in), I think it's safe to say that >> the dec

Re: [GSoC] Revamping validation framework and merging django-secure once again

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Christopher Medrela < chris.medr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Progress: I've implemented registering entry points. Now there is > `django.core.checks.register(callable)` function. There is no > `run_in_development` and `run_in_production` arguments. I've also rewritten >

Re: [GSoC] Revamping validation framework and merging django-secure once again

Hi Shai, Could I get you to open this as a ticket so that it isn't forgotten? Russ %-) On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Shai Berger wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > While you're dealing with model validation, I wonder if you can take a > look at > this little example -- a minor failure in the curr

Re: html email through from django.core.mail.send_mail and html email for password resets?

Hi Justin, On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Justin Michalicek wrote: > I would like to make my first contribution to the Django code, but these > both are pretty easy and at least to me seem pretty obvious, so I thought > there might be some good reason they have not yet already been done. > Dep

Re: html email through from django.core.mail.send_mail and html email for password resets?

Hi Justin, Correct - this should be handled as two separate tickets. If the patch for one ticket depends on a second, it's fine to have that dependency in the patches -- just note in the comments for the ticket when you upload your patch, or in the comment for the pull request. Essentially, we ju

Re: [GSoC] Revamping validation framework and merging django-secure once again

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Christopher Medrela wrote: > I'm still working at polishing after reviewing. I've deprecated > `requires_model_validation` and `validate`. I've started at adding tests > for > contenttype fields: `GenericForeignKey` and `GenericRelation`. > > I've updated gsoc2013-

Re: django.utils.functional.cached_property

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Daniele Procida wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013, Aymeric Augustin > wrote: > > >2013/8/6 Daniele Procida > > > >> Is there any reason why django.utils.functional.cached_property should > not > >> be documented, so that it can easily be used? > >> > >>

Re: django.utils.functional.cached_property

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Daniele Procida wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > >One suggestion -- a new special topic guide on performance tweaking > > <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20877> > > I'd like to take that o

Re: Proposal: ./manage check to look for models.BooleanField() without default= value.

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Collin Anderson wrote: > The new ./manage check command is for helping people upgrade to a new > version of django. > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/django-admin/#check > > django1.6 changes models.BooleanField() to not default to False any more. > This h

Re: Merging Schema Alteration branch

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Andrew Godwin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I think it's finally time to look at merging the schema-alteration branch, > which has gone slightly beyond its name and encompasses the schema > alteration backends and the migration code as well. > > The branch is working,

Re: GZipMiddleWare documentation

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Daniele Procida wrote: > What should the documents have to say on the subject now, in light of < > https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2013/aug/06/breach-and-django/>? > > > > Historically, we haven't updated our docu

Re: Deprecation a little harsh?

Hi Simon, On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Simon Litchfield wrote: > It's great all the housekeeping we've been doing lately, and I'm sure we > all agree nice to have clean, tidy code; but I wonder if we've been a > little too unforgiving at the expense of easy compatibility with important > thi

Re: [GSoC] Revamping validation framework and merging django-secure once again

Hi Christopher, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Christopher Medrela < chris.medr...@gmail.com> wrote: > *Progress.* > > - Deprecated `requires_model_validation` flag and `validate` method (both > `BaseCommand` members) in favour of new `requires_system_checks` flag and > `check` method. > >

Re: Changes in Model._meta

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Michal Petrucha wrote: > Hello, > > As part of my GSoC work [1] I did a refactor of ForeignKey whereby I > turned it into a virtual field which creates an auxiliary concrete > field to hold the raw value. > > As part of this, there are several changes that I did in

Re: [GSoC] Revamping validation framework and merging django-secure once again

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > > 8. I've added a new check. If you're using a `GenericRelation` but there >> is no >> `GenericForeignKey` on the target model, an warning is raised. This check >> w

Re: CSRF protection question

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:21 PM, James Roper wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a core dev on Play Framework, and I'm currently looking closely at our > CSRF protection and making improvements, and so I'm looking carefully at > what other frameworks do because when it comes to security, it's easy to > miss som

Re: Revisiting multiline tags

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Wim Feijen wrote: > Hi Jacob and Adrian, > > Reading this long thread with many +1s makes me think of truncatechars > which is not a good feeling. > It's important to remember that the truncatechars example wasn't anywhere near as simple as the original proposal

Re: Proposal: remove triage stage someday/maybe

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Wim Feijen wrote: > Hi, > > When triaging tickets I came across the triage stage Someday/Maybe. The > docs say I shouldn't use it. :) I think they are right. > > For me triaging tickets is all about making a decision. I make a choice > between either: "yes, good i

<    18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   >