On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:00 AM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Thierry wrote:
>> I know this is not a problem for most users. But when working with
>> complex projects or projects requiring some performance optimization
>> django orm doesn't suffice. Its a pity to see s
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Simon Willison wrote:
>
> One of the things that has been established at DjangoCon is that, as a
> community, we don't have a strong enough culture of testing. This is
> despite Django shipping with some good testing tools (TestClient and
> the like). Anything we c
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Kevin Teague wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 1:43 am, Simon Willison wrote:
>>
>> Option 6 would be welcome if anyone has any ideas.
>
> Do what Grok does:
>
> $ grokproject newapp
> $ cd newapp
> $ ./bin/test
> Running tests at level 1
> Total: 0 tests, 0 failures, 0 errors
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Christian Oudard
wrote:
>
> I wanted to get some feedback from the mailing list about a patch I
> wrote. There are two approaches I tried, and attached them both to
> this ticket:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10314
>
> Quick explanation: Basically, the
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Simon Willison wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 1:25 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> I think we need something else. In particular, I think we need to
>> address the problem at a slightly deeper level - we need to
>> acknowledge that we don
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Rob Hudson wrote:
>> * How do people feel about a tutorial that covers a complete site?
>
> Well, in grand Django tradition, by suggesting this, you've
> volunteered to be in charge :)
>
> But sign me u
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Rob Hudson wrote:
>
> I, too, like the idea of a conference site. It fills a void and
> sounds useful for upcoming conferences. I wasn't too crazy about the
> blog idea, and was convinced away from the snippets idea. So shall we
> call it a conference site and
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 6:44 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>> We're still gathering feature requests for 1.2
>> (seehttp://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.2Features), but we're
>> going to work voting differently. Instead of categorizing features
>>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
>> While it may not be *technically* too late to get the feature on the
>> voting list, my Magic 8-ball predicts that any vote on #3591 will have
>> the same result as last time - Rejected, needs more design work.
>>
>> All the serious proposa
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> In light of yesterday's security issue, I'd like to propose that we
> significantly dumb down the regex Django uses to validate email
> addresses.
>
> Currently, the regex we use covers many common cases, but comes
> nowhere near covering
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Hanne Moa wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 13:51, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Looking at #3591 in particular - another big part of the problem is
>> that the ticket tries to solve a theoretical problem that, in
>> practice, doe
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Christian Oudard
wrote:
>
> First off, thank you all for responding and discussing this issue.
>
> Responding to Russell's comments on the quality of the patch, I agree
> that it needs better test coverage. I've uploaded an updated patch
> which covers all exit po
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 12:46 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> If I may ask - which apps (or app names) caused the collision? Off the
>> top of my head, I can't think of any especially mainstream application
>
&
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 9:52 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>>
>> This is true, but again, the distinction between theoretical and
>> practical problem emerg
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 4:31 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> However, I can't recall the last time that someone asked the general
>> question of how to avoid a name collision between their two tagging
>> (or wha
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Zachary Voase
wrote:
>
> On 11 Oct 2009, at 23:39, Joshua Russo wrote:
>
>> How about the possibility of an advanced tutorial, to highlight more
>> advanced features.
>
> That's pretty much what the Django Book is for.
No, it really isn't.
Firstly, The Django Bo
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Christian Oudard
wrote:
>
> I think using it as a prefix is a good solution. Updated the patch,
> and attached it to the ticket. Should we reopen the ticket?
Done. I've also marked it for v1.2 so I remember to check it in.
All that is missing now is some docume
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
>
> Before we get too far, I'd appreciate hearing feedback from one or
> more of the core devs (and from some of the folks who were involved in
> this discussion back when it was happening on the ticket) on the wiki
> page[1] and the general
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Secondly, I share Chris' concern about overloading 'messages'. This
>> overlaps with the bikeshed issue of what to call the new c
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> I want to fix #6552 (also #12031), and I've attached a patch that
> makes the auth context processor lazy.
>
> I'm pretty sure this is the right thing to do, but I'd like to check
> for any gotchas people might be aware of.
I can't see any o
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Christian Oudard
wrote:
>
> I'm a bit green on doing documentation, but I'll give it a try. I'll
> probably have to post a documentation patch and get some feedback a
> few times before it's correct. Should I mark it as changed in version
> 1.2 like this?
>
> ..
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> There is a bit of cruft in LazyObject that I'd like to fix -
> 'get_all_members'. This seems to be left over from before it got
> separated from LazySettings. The method is *only* needed to support
> introspection, which is usua
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As a consequence of the proposed CSRF changes, we brought up wanting
> to add a shortcut like render_to_response that uses RequestContext, as
> a refinement, but didn't decide on anything. Ideally, we would have
> something as sh
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Yuri Baburov wrote:
>
> That means,
> 1) perfect render_to_response should be lazy.
This isn't a new idea - Simon Willison has been proposing this general
idea for a while. He's been talking specifically about making template
rendering lazy, so you can use middl
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Yuri Baburov wrote:
>
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/django-openid/source/browse/trunk/django_openid/response.py
> Thanks.
>
> Exactly this
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Gabriel Farrell wrote:
>
> I hate to waste time talking about the tools rather than the product,
> but I'm frustrated by my inability to get my patches displaying nicely
> in the Django code trac. See
> http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/11250/admin
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Sean Brant wrote:
>
> Using a decorator allows you to do cool things like
>
> @provides_html('myapp/mypage.html')
> @provides_json(optional_serialize_callback_can_go_here)
> def my_view(request):
> return {'foo': 'bar')
>
> Then your provides_* could check the
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:59 AM, berto wrote:
>
> Hello developers,
>
> I wanted to be able to run a project's test suite in the same manner
> runserver restarts when a file is changed. I did not find this
> feature in Django so I wrote the following code:
>
> http://www.djangosnippets.org/snip
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
>
> Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Ivan Sagalaev
>> wrote:
>>> Ticket [9886] is one of the things that I've been holding for 1.2 time
>>> frame to ask for some discussion since Jacob marked it DDN.
>>
>> At firs
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:28 PM, diover wrote:
>
> How I can use any AddWYSIWYGEditor in Django?
Django-developers is a mailing list for discussing the development of
Django itself. General questions of usage or problem solving should be
directed to django-users.
Yours,
Russ Magee %-)
--~--~-
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:14 PM, berto wrote:
>
> On Oct 17, 5:33 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> I'd like to fix this problem, but while this problem exists, adding a
>> continuous integration server that crashes every time the developer
>> makes a Sy
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Exe wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>> As a consequence of the proposed CSRF changes, we brought up wanting
>> to add a shortcut like render_to_response that uses RequestContext
>
> I want to propose another method.
>
> Why we need RequestContext? We need it to provide global
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've just stumbled upon a difficult to understand problem. I have an app
> that has an urlconf which is included in a project under a namespace:
>
> (r'^blog/', include('app.urls', namespace='blog')),
>
> This namespace all
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Hanne Moa wrote:
>
> It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket #3011, Allow for
> extendable user module, will be in for 1.2. So: let's think afresh,
> start from scratch, think about what we really, really want. This is
> my pony for *2.0*:
I completely
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
> Hi Yuri, Mart --
>
> I feel that I need to make it clear that I'm not ignoring you, or this
> conversation. However, the tone is so hostile and unprofessional that
> it'd be a waste of my time to try to engage, so I'm simply going to
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Michael P. Jung wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose a new field lookup __neq which could be used to
> negate a single parameter. It is not ment to make exclude() obsolete, as
> they both have a different scope:
>
> filter(x__neq=1, y__neq=2) would translate to "(x <>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Hanne Moa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 16:18, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Hanne Moa wrote:
>>>
>>> It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket #3011, Allow for
&g
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Lakin Wecker wrote:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11967
>
> As commented on the ticket:
>
> This is driving me nuts too. It wouldn't be so bad if this was a 404, but
> combined with #11191 and #3785 it generates a ton of 500 errors. :/
>
> Any chan
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:22 AM, mrts wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 7:19 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
> Django Bug Days
> ---
>
> At regular intervals, say twice a month on Saturdays,
> set aside 2-3 hours for IRC-based bug hunting sprints.
Yes, we should have more regular sprints. Howeve
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:48 AM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Let me tell you a store about three people named Everybody, Anybody,
>> Somebody and Nobody.
>
> Four! The four people in this story are...
e
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:47 PM, mrts wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 3:36 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
> As I said, I don't think I'm actually in a pjosition to suggest
> improvements to the workflow (being Nobody in that little story :)),
> but I'd be most pleased t
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Waldemar Kornewald
wrote:
>
> Hi again,
> now a little question:
>
> Some fields do type conversions. For example, TimeField converts
> datetime objects into time objects.
> App Engine doesn't support time, but only datetime, so should we do
> such conversions at
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Phillip Temple
wrote:
>
> Two apps I would like to see in contrib are:
> mptt - this has been stable for a long time, integrates well into
> django, and is now a dependency for a few apps out there
> django-registration - rewritten to have pluggable work flow, th
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Thomas Wanschik
wrote:
>
>> When a new QuerySet is instantiated (e.g. by calling
>> Model.objects.all()) it asks the backend for its Query class and then
>> creates an instance of that class. By default, this class is
>> sql.Query. Only the Oracle backend has its
Hi all,
The v1.2 votes are in, and it appears that Email-01 (introducing an
email backend API) needs some more discussion.
I am in complete agreement that Django shouldn't try to become an
email framework. That isn't the intention of this proposal.
The intention is to fix a specific problem tha
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Thomas Wanschik
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22 Okt., 23:52, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Thomas Wanschik
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> When a new QuerySet is instantiated (e.g. by calling
>&g
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Dan wrote:
>>
>> I didn't know about rosetta. What would you guys think of having a doc
>> section about popular third party apps?
Putting a list of applications really isn't the right solution - for
one t
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:40 AM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> A wiki page doesn't really solve the problem either. If you make it an
>> exclusive list, someone has to decide who is on the list and who
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Waldemar Kornewald
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> The current query_class will need to change slightly to support
>> multi-db, so anything you implement against that interface will
>> r
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Waldemar Kornewald
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> To date, sql.Query is the right structure for all Django's supported
>> backends. It might even be the right structure for a non-SQL back
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Gustavo Narea
wrote:
>
> Hi there.
>
> Over the last week I've been working to improve WSGI support in Django
> and I have sent a few patches which have not received the feedback I
> expected to have, so I wanted to ping you. ;-)
In the interests of good communi
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Johan wrote:
>
> Hi. In django\template\__init__.py on line 54 there is a line of
> code : from django.conf import settings. Firstly there is no
> settings.py file in django\conf, ther is however a file called
> global_settings.py. In my context the is issue is f
Hi all,
I've just finished the polishing the first part of Alex's GSoC work to
add Multi-db, which I'd like to commit. This is a call for feedback.
This first patch isn't directly related to multi-db, but it is a
prerequisite that will allow the multi-db code to function. The goal
of this patch
On Oct 30, 4:33 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just finished the polishing the first part of Alex's GSoC work to
> add Multi-db, which I'd like to commit. This is a call for feedback.
I forgot to mention - the patch _should_ be completely backwards
On Oct 25, 3:22 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The v1.2 votes are in, and it appears that Email-01 (introducing an
> email backend API) needs some more discussion.
>
> I am in complete agreement that Django shouldn't try to become an
> email framework. T
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Johannes Dollinger
wrote:
>
> The m2m-refactor patch breaks ManyToManyFields on abstract models:
> "AssertionError: ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstract
> class A"
Thanks for the report, Johannes. I'll take a look at this and see what
I can do about
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Johannes Dollinger
> wrote:
>>
>> The m2m-refactor patch breaks ManyToManyFields on abstract models:
>> "AssertionError: ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstra
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
>
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> On the 'missing something' front, reverse() now takes a 'current_app'
>> argument that gives context to the app lookup, which resolves the
>> ambiguity from the po
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
>
> Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
>> Ahha! This is the catch I was missing. So in order for an app to place
>> itself generally in the "namespace-aware" category it should define a
>> function that will return a triple of (patterns, app_namespace,
>> in
Hi all,
A quick reminder - if you have any objections or feedback on #10109,
the M2M refactor [1], I intend to land this patch in approximately 48
hours.
Also, following some mailing list and IRC discussion [2], I'll be
trying to land #10355 at the same time. This is the addition of the
email ba
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
> Hi Russ --
>
> I'm +1 on merging the patch immediately. I have some feedback on the
> couple of issues you raised below, but I see no reason they can't be
> addressed after merging.
>
> On Fri, Oct
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Andi Albrecht
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
>> wrote:
>>> A quick reminder - if you have any objections or feedback on #10109,
>
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Yuri Baburov wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Since you are discussing and applying different features,
>
> I think it's time to ask what do you think of the subj.
>
> It's at http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11834
>
> It adds some helpful color beauty to django 500 outp
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Andi Albrecht
wrote:
>
> This just came up on IRC: in django.test.utils
> setup_test_environment() the lines 46/47 are mixed up.
>
> Here's a diff that fixes this issue:
>
> diff --git a/django/test/utils.py b/django/test/utils.py
> index a30bb7e..9d39eee 100644
>
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Eric Holscher wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Next on my pony list for v1.2: #7052 - fixing the serializers to work
>> around the problem of serializing dynamical
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:41 AM, mattimust...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>> In my minds eye, I have a vision of a serialization framework that
>> would allow for registration of different serialization formats - not
>> just JSON/XML, but the fields and internal structure of a JSON
>> fixture, etc. Descri
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Travis Cline wrote:
>
> On Nov 5, 10:21 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>> That said, I do think Eric's suggestion of automatically introspecting
>> for unique/unique_together is the best idea I've seen yet. Well, the
>> best idea that doesn't require a ground-up rew
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Rob Madole wrote:
>
> (accidentally sent this directly to Russell, he has offered to help me
> re-construct this where it belongs)
(and, repeating my response that got sent privately to Rob)
> I am under-the-covers-down-and-naughty familiar with this one.
>
> Thi
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:48 PM, J Meier wrote:
>
> I've implemented a nearly identical solution for this problem before,
> and while it worked, it felt dirty.
>
> It strikes me that the problem is to do with our "surrogate" primary
> key ids, which don't relate to the data at all. For most models
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Christophe Pettus wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> As part of proposing a patch for a bug I filed (#12180), I ran across
> this ticket, and took the liberty of claiming it. Since I'm
> relatively new to working on Django code proper, I wanted to start a
> discussion abo
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Sean Brant wrote:
>
> Stop me if you have heard this one before. Anyone else find it
> annoying that direct_to_template takes the kwarg "template" and most
> other generic views take "template_name". Smells a little like php to
> me.
>
> Is this something that sho
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:06 AM, mrts wrote:
>
> Great news! Have you discussed the workflow yet?
> I.e. will a DVCS be involved, and if yes, will there be
> a central repo for coordinating the effort?
>
> A special repo on Github would otherwise be perfect,
> but as mentioned before, we have a p
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>
> Djangonauts,
> To help speed along development on Django, I'd like us to start
> holding regularly-scheduled sprints.
On behalf of the core team, I'd like to thank Jeremy for taking the
lead on this. Organizing an event like a sprint isn
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Warren Smith wrote:
>
> If this question would be more appropriate for django-users, please
> let me know. I ask it here because I suspect that the answer to my
> question may require someone with a fairly deep understanding of the
> ORM internals.
>
> I have a l
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:57 AM, mrts wrote:
>
> On Nov 11, 1:57 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Also - I know you're very enthused about Git and GitHub, but Django
>> uses SVN as the canonical store for trunk and branches, and this isn't
>> likely to
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Malone wrote:
> Sup,
>
> I've been working on template caching (ticket #6262) with a mister
> Alex Gaynor. The patch is getting pretty stable and I think it's close
> to merge-able, so if anyone wants to take a look at what we've got and
> provide feedback: go
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Warren Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Multi-db allows you to set up multiple database credentials; the usual
>> reason for this is to split DB load across multiple database servers,
>> bu
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Warren Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>> 1. Retrieve the credentials from the session.
>>> 2. Create a new, or update an existing, entry for those credentials in
>>> the database con
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:15 AM, stevecrozz wrote:
> I tried to reopen this bug http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9286,
> but apparently that's a no-no since it was closed as invalid by a core
> developer.
>
> I'd like someone to take another look at it since I think Jacob didn't
> understand t
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The online docs can easily give the impression that we have perfect
> compatibility with Django 1.0 — the 'Django over time' section on [1]
> has a link to 'Backwards-incompatible changes' [2], which contains
> pre-1.0 changes only,
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Stephen Crosby wrote:
> Thanks for the response Russell,
>
> We can get into exactly what I'm doing if we need to, but for now lets just
> assume that I've thought this through fairly thoroughly and I do in fact
> want to start background processes from certain ver
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Djoume wrote:
> Dear Djangonauts,
>
> I have read the documentation and I think I understand why we don't
> want to store empty strings as NULL in the database.
>
> I also understand that model validation is being worked on and it's
> not what I'm trying to achieve
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Malone wrote:
> Sup,
>
> I've been working on template caching (ticket #6262) with a mister
> Alex Gaynor. The patch is getting pretty stable and I think it's close
> to merge-able, so if anyone wants to take a look at what we've got and
> provide feedback: go
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Malone wrote:
>>> Sup,
>>>
>>> I've been working on template caching (ticket #6262) with a
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Warren Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>> Would it make sense to factor out the connection selection logic into
>>> a utility function with parameters that make it usable in all
>>>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Schmilblick wrote:
> Sorry for crashing the list, but how does this affect this bug:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5390 ?
>
> I'm currently using django with the patch provided in that ticket, and
> the latest commits regarding the gsoc-project created a
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Eric Holscher wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> What I did
>
>
> First thing I did was write tests for the current behavior[1]. No tests were
> written for the original commit, so if nothing else, these tests should be
> commited. The link there works for the current
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:52 PM, jedie wrote:
> What is the right "spelling": 'locmem:///' or 'locmem://' ???
>
> In the docu is three "/" [1]
> but in global_settings.py is two "/" [2]
>
> [1] http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/cache/#local-memory-caching
> [2]
> http://code.djangoproje
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Thierry wrote:
> Ok scaffolding has seen a lot of ups and downs in the dev community.
>
> Type 1
> "lets generate code, because that way our programming language sucks
> less" approach some PHP frameworks take.
>
> Type 2
> Intelligent code snippets (generation) su
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:35 PM, rebus_ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my first bug report so please don't shoot me right away.
>
> In revision 11744 [1] code was added in
> django/contrib/admin/validation.py which is supposed to improve the
> error message for M2M fields. It seems to me that this chan
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> I had a quick poke around the rest of the code base, especially about
>> transition issues. However, I didn't want to start in on a big
>&
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Jani Tiainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 01:14 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Russ and I have been working on getting the multi-db work ready for
>> merge (final stretch here hopefully!), and I just ported the Oracle
>> backend to the slightly updat
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
> Hi Russell, thanks for all your feedback. I'll review the small issues in a
> separate email (or just fix them), but here are my responses to the two
> bigger problems.
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Russell
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
> On Saturday 21 November 2009 11:54:40 Tim Chase wrote:
> The problem is there are no 1.1.2 release notes yet. Also, if you put
> "versionchanged:: 1.2", our docs are set up to parse that as referring
> to the next version of Django, so it says
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Tim Chase
wrote:
>> 2. Mess around with the Sphinx processor and make it display point
>> release numbers but link to the minor release.
>
> A big -1 if documentation can only be built with a custom version
> of Sphinx, making it harder for others to build docs. A
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Richard Laager wrote:
> It was suggested in #django that I ask here about some patches I've
> submitted:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&reporter=~rlaager&has_patch=1&order=priority
>
> What should I be doing to hel
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Rahul wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There is a problem reported for history view in admin page.
> For history view there is a sql query generated, which trying to do
> exact look-up on OBJECT_ID column (LogEntry model, DJANGO_ADMIN_LOG
> table).
>
> "TextField" is responsib
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Mario Briggs wrote:
>>>
> What is stored in this field is a string-serialized representation of
> the
> primary key value.
> <<
>
> I agree that INTEGER is not the right choice, but then so too is CLOB.
> How long is this string-serialized representation going to b
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:10 AM, jedie wrote:
> DateTimeField "auto_now" and "auto_now_add" used datetime.now(). But
> why this? IMHO it's better to use datetime.utcnow(), isn't it?
Why would it be? A datetime field isn't necessarily stored in UTC. It
uses datetime.now() because that will return
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Mario Briggs
>> wrote:
>>> I agree that INTEGER is not the right choice, but then so too is CLOB.
>>>
101 - 200 of 2850 matches
Mail list logo
