Re: Suggestion: Better slugifying of scandinavic characters

If it's so difficult, why don't we start with a solution that solves the problem for almost everyone. If someone encounters characters we didn't think of, we can always add it to the mapping table... Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You receiv

Re: is_approved

as I know. The sub-optimal alternative is using a foreignkey to the User model, use inline editing and set max_num_in_admin to 1. BTW when can we expect model inheritance? (I'm not asking for a date, it's ready when it's done. But is it a high priority or

Re: is_approved

ther countries. I agree with Bryan that all personal user information should be in the profile model. Rudolph When looking to firstname / lastname from an international point of view --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to th

sanitizing user input

(not DRY). At the moment I do it like this: from django.utils.html import strip_tags fields = ('address', 'city') for field in fields: self.__dict__[field] = strip_tags(self.__dict__[field]) Maybe the CharField and TextField could have a strip_tags optio

Re: Proposal: default escaping

he idea of globally enabled escaping, and only do it per template as described above. I'm not sure what I like the most. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To

Re: Proposal: default escaping

Hi, Derek Anderson mentioned the need for different kinds of escaping. So maybe the syntax should be more something like: {% autoescape xml on %} and {% autoescape javascript on %} Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are

Re: Proposal: default escaping (and branch request)

Hi, How about adding a command to django-admin.py that scans all the templates of the project and enabled apps and gives you a list of templates that have unescaped values in them, maybe even display the tags/lines concerned. IMHO this could be very valueable info for a developer. Rudolph

limit_choices_to does not limit list_filter in admin interface

Hi, When I limit the choices in a one-to-many field with "limit_choices_to", then the "list_filter" in the admin interface should show the same limited choices. Does anyone disagree with this? Else I file a feature requ

Bug introduced at changeset 4500

t). Does anyone else experience this since changeset 4500? Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroup

Re: Bug introduced at changeset 4500

On Feb 15, 10:53 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 06:02 -0800, Rudolph wrote: > > Hi, > > > I think I found a bug introduced in changeset 4500 (http:// > > code.djangoproject.com/changeset/4500). When a min_num_in_ad

Re: Bug introduced at changeset 4500

27;t correctly > handling min_num_in_admin > num_in_admin cases prior to r4500. > > Regards, > Malcolm Thanks, I'll test my problem and let you know the result. Regards, Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you

relative of absolute imports

s are even deprecated in the near future: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0328/. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: relative of absolute imports

Hi, The subject of this discussion should of course be "Relative or absolute imports", sorry for the typo. The mentioned relative import of util is just an example since other modules in newforms are imported in a relative fashion too. Thank

Re: magic-removal: plans/estimates for the trunk-merge?

Hi, If it's so stable since Pycon, why doesn't it get merged into trunk? The trunk is not a release, but it's the first step towards a new release. I'm just impatient :) Rudolph -- Release early, release often... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You r

Re: magic-removal: from django.parts.media.photos import get_thumbnail_url

Will django.parts.media get dropped in again soon? I would like it if the ImageField fully works again. Cheers, Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To po

Re: Connections not being closed in m-r

For me the same, hitting refresh a couple of times creates more and more of those '[local] idle in transaction' things. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers&quo

Re: Connections not being closed in m-r

MPM one uses (worker, prefork etc) and depending on the settings for things like MaxClients, ThreadsPerChild, ServerLimit etc. As I said I'm not an expert on this subject but I think it's interesting information for people setting up t

bug in homepage of admin M-R (+solution)

ptions get ignored or are invisible. Solution, change: django/contrib/admin/templates/admin/index.html Put this line: {{ app.name }} above the for loop instead of inside it. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: More specific CSS rules for the admin

It could be solved by putting the django-admin stuff inside a tag with a django-admin class. Then ".django-admin p" or ".django-admin #content" will format only the admin stuff and not your site. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received

Re: bug in homepage of admin M-R (+solution)

Wow, you fixed this faster than light can travel ;-) Thanks Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-

installperms and/or sqlinitialdata

el does have an 'Admin' class. Seems like a bug to me, does anyone else experience this? Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this gro

Re: installperms and/or sqlinitialdata

Yes, I use syncdb all the time, but it would be nice if you could also let it generate the SQL without executing it. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group.

Re: Simplify admin template overrides

d maybe it should also be possible to include some custom XHTML above the add/change form too. Anyway, such a thing would make it really easy to customise the admin interface a bit. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed t

Re: A problem of js option of Admin options

suggestion, see http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/578 and http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/61. As you can see, this is an old issue, still not solved (I can't see a passwordfield in M-R). Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message becaus

Slug JS stopped working in M-R?

Hi, It seems like the Javascript for a SlugField stopped working in the current revision of M-R. Or is it me messing things up... Does anyone else experience this? Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Slug JS stopped working in M-R?

It's working again, the fault must have been on my side. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@g

A few i18n issues on M-R

s I do not have a fix (yet). Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from th

Re: Template tag magic that hasn't been removed

ation: it's not very attractive to create an empty app just to have a place to put the taglibrary (this is what the doc's tell you). On the other hand, I don't have a better solution (yet). Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message becaus

Re: Template tag magic that hasn't been removed

I just thought of a better solution. Taglibraries are just like templates: - they get loaded from paths set in settings.py - and else they get loaded by the template_loaders IMHO we could do the same thing for taglibraries. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

Re: OneToOneField behavior doesn't match docs

lank = True, ) birthday = models.DateField( 'birthday', ) class Admin: pass Cheers, Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To p

Content-Security-Policy header for Django 1.8 SecurityMiddleware

request with tests and documentation: https://github.com/django/django/pull/3550, could someone who has been working on the new SecurityMiddleware review this pull request? The related ticket is over here: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15727 Thanks! Rudolph -- You received this message

Re: Using RequestContext by default in default 500 handler

, but that can be done by a little script. Rudolph On Jun 23, 12:28 pm, Jason Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have several clients who make heavy use of MEDIA_URL for styling > their sites.  The pages generated by the default 500 error handler > look rather

Re: More secure user password reset

y and would be happy to contribute it. The nice thing is that HOTP has been studied and at the moment can be considered safe. Thanks, Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers"

Check-in of change to is_required=True on BooleanField

uot;is_required" on the other fields enforces that it gets a value. So to my opinion the is_required attribute now has two meanings, which is a bad thing. Thanks, Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Generic relations and non-integer primary keys

on-integer primary key. Shall I add a ticket for this and add a patch for the documentation to include such a remark? Thanks! Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. T

Re: Generic relations and non-integer primary keys

cket that adds this requirement to the docs: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7785 Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to djang

Re: Generic relations and non-integer primary keys

Yes, that's why the proposed patch for the documentation says that both must be of the same type: http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/7785/note-about-primary-keys.diff Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subsc

Re: newforms-admin branch has been merged into trunk

Wow, thanks for all the hard work to everyone involved! This is really awesome! I'll update the Dutch translations soon. And I'll have to start preparing my company's 30+ Django projects for this change... ;) Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Yo

Title of admin app index view is untranslatable

e bracket). I'd like propose to change back to milestone "1.0". BTW thanks for al the amazing work being done for 1.0 release! Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django devel

Re: Updating a locale

Hi, The process is documented here: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/contributing/#submitting-and-maintaining-translations Doing it right now is a good time since strings are frozen until 1.0 releases. Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this

Re: ANNOUNCE: Django 1.0 released

Here's to the most fabulous webframework in the world! Rudolph Froger --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to dj

Re: Proposal: django.forms.SafeForm - forms with built in CSRF protection

is to True. People would then need to explicitly turn off CSRF protection globally or on a per form basis. Thanks, Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to th

Re: Proposal: django.forms.SafeForm - forms with built in CSRF protection

be used in AJAX or forms generated by javascript: var token = '{% csrf_token %}'; Cheers, Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post t

Re: Auto-escaping comitted

-developer friendly to not escape {{ block.super }} by default. Kind regards, Rudolph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email

Re: Fixtures without a pk

Structured markup can only represent tree like organised objects (without tricks). Maybe we can keep the primary keys inside the fixtures, but add an optional attribute that indicates that the primary key for this object is only used to link the objects together when importing the data? --~--~

Fixtures without a pk

rking with a pk=null (found this in the tests for the serializers). My suggestion: It would be nice to use the django-admin.py with an extra option to dump certain data without primary keys. If you like the idea, I'll file a ticket (and maybe implement it at the upcoming Django sprint). Re