Fwd: Discussion related to ticket #26822 (new migrations, --keepdb and --parallel option)

2016-07-04 Thread Romain Garrigues
hen you have added a new migration between 2 test run. I'm not sure my explanation was clear enough, but I would really like to have your feedbacks about it. Regards, Romain Garrigues. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (

Re: Discussion related to ticket #26822 (new migrations, --keepdb and --parallel option)

2016-07-05 Thread Romain Garrigues
use case. > > > >Now let’s talk about models and migrations in users’ projects, which is > the logical next step and the use case you’re trying to improve. > > > >Note that the `--parallel` option is experimental and often > non-functional in this contex

Re: Make django.db.models.deletion.Collector public?

2016-07-21 Thread Romain Garrigues
Hi Shai, I needed a similar feature in one of my projects. I have started to use and try to extend the Django collector used in Admin deletion, and finished with something I was not really happy about... I have then created a full collector (following all relations, foreign keys, manytomany, GFK

Re: Discussion related to ticket #26822 (new migrations, --keepdb and --parallel option)

2016-09-21 Thread Romain Garrigues
Any feedback about my 2 proposals, to know if it is worth to spend time to propose a patch for one of those? Le mardi 5 juillet 2016 18:54:27 UTC+1, Romain Garrigues a écrit : > > > Markus, I like the idea, which is definitely better than my idea of new > option to recreate it manu

Re: django-formtools is neglected/unmaintained

2017-01-05 Thread Romain Garrigues
Hi guys, I'm currently investing some efforts to clean and make some django packages up-to-date. After django-dirtyfields (https://github.com/romgar/django-dirtyfields), I'm now beginning to work on django-model-utils (https://github.com/carljm/django-model-utils) where there is some work to u