Re: How to interpret the performance difference: Tornado vs Django

2009-10-06 Thread Roberto De Ioris
chronous, so do not spend more time trying to gather more then a 1% performance improvement, and choose the environment looking at first at its robustness and its features. And please,please (and please) stop doing benchmark with an hello world. Even the most under-talented programmer can op

Re: Django performance vs others

2012-10-04 Thread Roberto De Ioris
buse its JIT, this rarely happens on 'classic' webapps where the biggest part of the response cycle is spent waiting for dbs (or external services in general). This is the same reason why benchmarking application servers is generally useless :) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it

Re: Django performance vs others

2012-10-05 Thread Roberto De Ioris
only giving an example on mis-readed benchmarks, and giving an explanation on why PyPy is (still) not particular 'powerful' in classic web-apps scenario -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it JID: robe...@jabber.unbit.it -- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

Re: Feature: Support Server-Sent Events

2015-05-30 Thread Roberto De Ioris
the WSGI container (does mod_wsgi > support async python code? i guess gunicorn does), and also for the > communications between the 'main' Django views and the SSE part. > (probably the cache API would be appropriate) > > I obviously agree, but take in account that this

Re: Feature: Support Server-Sent Events

2015-05-31 Thread Roberto De Ioris
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Roberto De Ioris > wrote: >> I obviously agree, but take in account that this uWSGI plugin simplified >> the steps a lot: >> >> https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi-sse-offload > > > nice. it certainly looks cleaner than having

Re: uWSGI documentation

2011-04-04 Thread Roberto De Ioris
ad plugins and spawn the embedded http router/proxy on a default port. You can specify the socket=ADDR option to disable the http part and bind the server on a uwsgi socket (for directly pointing your webserver to it) It run multithreaded (8 threads) but i suppose that this could be another config

Re: uWSGI documentation

2011-04-04 Thread Roberto De Ioris
on. If a user want to use something like the uWSGI timer/cron system http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/DjangoTimers http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/CronInterface it can just start coding without passing for all the stack configuration. -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it -- You received thi

Re: uWSGI documentation

2011-04-08 Thread Roberto De Ioris
tack If you have some doubt please ask me or the official uWSGI mailing-list i know that uWSGI official docs are really bad and not synced with the current code :P -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dja

Re: uWSGI documentation

2011-04-09 Thread Roberto De Ioris
nto the official Django documentation. > > I have asked anything, other users spawned this thread, and as the main uWSGI author i am doing suggestions/corrections. -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django develo

Re: uWSGI documentation

2011-04-24 Thread Roberto De Ioris
e important) note to add is that uWSGI does not run on Windows -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsub

Re: WSGIRequest._stream.read() blocking

2011-06-14 Thread Roberto De Ioris
our question :) > > By the way, it would also be great if anybody knows how to use pdb > statements, while running uwsgi on the console. Look here, http://lists.unbit.it/pipermail/uwsgi/2011-April/001769.html the same is valid for pratically all of the other WSGI daemons out there.

Re: runfcgi umask unusable without daemonize=false.. why?

2011-09-09 Thread Roberto De Ioris
not being able to have uwsgi). Not related to your specific question, but remember that uWSGI can natively speaks fastcgi (both in static and dynamic way) static config: uwsgi --fastcgi-socket ... dynamic (apache passing the socket as fd 0) uwsgi --protocol=fastcgi ... -- Roberto De Ioris ht