Hi Todor
I am experiencing the same problem. Can you please post the
possible solution?
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 8:26:32 AM UTC+5:30, Todor Velichkov wrote:
>
> It does? Can you give me a link to that please?
>>
>
> Pard me, it does not explicitly say to set values programmatically, but
> First we hide the the user field because we dont want the user to see it,
> and at the same time keeping it inside form fields we wont prevent the
> unique_together validation.
> Second - we disable the field and programmatically set initial value to be
> used during form
On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 11:55:41 PM UTC+5:30, Protik wrote:
>
> Hi, Todor
>
> I have tested this solution and It looks like it works only when you don't
> disable the field (i.e the last line in the BookForm's `__init__()` method.
> My views looks lik
hat in
> the form constructor (by settings initial value + disabled attr).
>
> On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 9:25:41 PM UTC+3, Protik wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Todor
>>
>> I have tested this solution and It looks like it works only when you
>> don't di
hat in
> the form constructor (by settings initial value + disabled attr).
>
> On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 9:25:41 PM UTC+3, Protik wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Todor
>>
>> I have tested this solution and It looks like it works only when you
>> don't disable the field (i
hat in
> the form constructor (by settings initial value + disabled attr).
>
> On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 9:25:41 PM UTC+3, Protik wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Todor
>>
>> I have tested this solution and It looks like it works only when you
>> don't disable the fiel
let
> you do quick release for development and testing, user will be able try the
> module and see if it solves their problems. In my opinion, something
> generic won't help when validating unique_together relationship when one of
> the fields is not exposed to the user. Bu
Yes, it is working now.
Thank you very much.
On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 1:43:00 PM UTC+5:30, Todor Velichkov wrote:
>
> Protik, just use `self.fields['user'].initial = user.id` instead of just
> `user`. Just tested it and it work fine.
>
> On Monday, September 2
