Re: Process discussion: reboot

2010-04-20 Thread Paul Egges
This sounds like a great idea to me. +1 for me. I've a been a bit reluctant to up my participation for a variety of reasons, but kind of knowing how best to proceed is one of the large ones. Thanks, Paul On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Stephen Crosby wrote: > What could be very helpful here

Re: Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-09 Thread Paul Egges
I was thinking the same thing. Make absolutely sure it works under 2.5-2.7 and even if there are a couple of issues or items not fully tested under 3.2.2 at least we will be moving in the right direction. paul On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Joseph Tennies wrote: > I must say that I would perso

Re: Proposal: drop Python 2.5 support in Django 1.5

2011-12-10 Thread Paul Egges
+1 I thought there was an implicit understanding that only 3 versions of Python would be supported at any given time. If so it makes sense to drop support for 2.4 when we add 3.x. On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Jannis Leidel wrote: > > I propose that we attempt to merge the py3k work after

Re: start using less (and bootstrap!)

2012-02-02 Thread Paul Egges
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins wrote: > ... > As far as core. Bootstrap should be a 3rd party app, but possibly having > less support in core might be helpful. > > > Funny how that reads. Perhaps for clarity it should say but ' ... possibly having support for "less" in core

Re: Revisiting multiline tags

2012-02-24 Thread Paul Egges
Mark me a +1 on this as well. Many of us don't ask for items in discussion that have been marked as "won't fix" because we don't realize that the decisions on these items can be reversed. Thanks, Paul On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Bradley Ayers wrote: > > On 24/02/2012, at 7:01 PM, Stephan

Re: Ticket 2273: django.contrib.auth.models.User: username is case-sensitive

2015-10-21 Thread Paul Egges
Perhaps I'm missing something, but this would not change current users, only the creation of new users. It seems that logins would still be case sensitive. It would just prevent new users from being created that would match in a case insensitive manner with an existing user. For example existing us

Re: Ticket 2273: django.contrib.auth.models.User: username is case-sensitive

2015-10-22 Thread Paul Egges
itive manner. On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Shai Berger wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday 22 October 2015 00:01:24 Paul Egges wrote: > > Perhaps I'm missing something, but this would not change current users, > > only the creation of new users. It seems that logins would still

Re: Proposal: switch to HTML5 for bundled templates

2011-03-28 Thread Paul Egges
I agree completely that we should move to HTML5. It seems like it will be even more important as more and more people use Smart Phones or Pads for surfing the net, and I believe all of these are supporting HTML5. I've started attending some HTML5 user group meetings, and I'm quite impressed with t

Re: please reopen ticket 15567

2011-09-13 Thread Paul Egges
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > On Sep 13, 8:24 pm, Adam Jenkins wrote: > > +1 on making the error say more than incorrect username/password. That > > is confusing. In regards to leaking information about the user. The > > error message in general could be changed to s

Re: DEP pre-proposal for a simpler URLs syntax.

2016-11-02 Thread Paul Egges
Actually, we do something very similar to this in a routes.py for a flask app. Except instead of "pass" we call a function that has been imported. Paul *Flask* > Doesn't really have the idea of putting all your routes in one spot. So > pardon the silly example. > > > @app.route('articles/2003/'

Re: Added signals that runs when adding an object to a Many-To-One relation

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Egges
I thought a Many-To-One would not require an intermediate table, so it would be caught by pre-save and post-save on the object containing the Foreign Key. Is that not true? Paul On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Oskar Persson wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I've created a pull request (8018) >

Re: Added signals that runs when adding an object to a Many-To-One relation

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Egges
Good to know. Thanks, Paul On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Oskar Persson wrote: > No, the save method isn't called unless you specify bulk=False > > > Den fredag 3 februari 2017