An App Loading mechanism for Django
About Me
--
Hi everyone,
My name is Nick Sandford, I'm an electrical engineering student at the
University of Western Australia.
Background
---
I haven't been a particularly active contributor t
ers/browse_thread/thread/4cca2086dd485879?hl=en,
> there's a question you avoided delicately, about what to do with
> ForeignKey. It might also help.
As far as I see that, it's more about what to do when you have two
instances of the
same application, which I won't be attemp
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
>
> Have you looked at the patch on ticket 3591 which does some of this
> already? Would you be using it as a starting point?
It's a great place to start, and gives a good idea about where to look for
problems. I'm not sure about get_installed_
An updated proposal:
An App Loading mechanism for Django
About Me
--
Hi everyone,
My name is Nick Sandford, I'm an electrical engineering student at the
University of Western Australia.
Background
---
I haven't been a particula
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Nick Sandford
> wrote:
>> An App Loading mechanism for Django
>>
>>
>> About Me
>> --
>> Hi everyone,
>>
I was just working on #22986 and it seems that if the
AppConfig.get_model(s) methods are overridden, migrations for models that
are excluded are still run.
Is this a known issue? Am I abusing get_model(s) or should I file a ticket
for this?
Cheers,
Nick
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2298
from
> those, so you won't be able to affect them by overriding methods. If you
> want to exclude models from migrations use router.allow_migrate.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Nick Sandford
> wrote:
>
>> I was just working on #22986 and it
our bugs with swappable models.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Nick Sandford
> wrote:
>
>> Ahh ok, that makes sense -- I guess there's no difference between
>> overriding get_model(s) and manually deleting the model out of the source
>> to
>
> If you're happy saying the same thing about sessions, then go and tie the
> model's managed option to the setting - that should do what you want - but
> people are going to get real confused when they change the setting and the
> table isn't made for them.
&g
So, I have been working a little on a PR for this (
https://github.com/django/django/pull/3003) and having spoken to Tim
briefly about getting this supported in jenkins I just wanted to check that
the approach was OK. The tests use node, grunt, qunit, istanbul and jshint.
Is this a reasonable appro
10 matches
Mail list logo
