Ticket #8161 - Please help me fix this.

2009-03-11 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi all, I wanted to fix this bug. I just went through the code to see what was happening. For the same sample code given in the ticket, these were my findings: The schema generated looks like this and there is no issue with it: CREATE TABLE "testapp_childmodel" ( "parentmodel_ptr_id" inte

Re: Ticket #8161 - Please help me fix this.

2009-03-11 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Alex, First of all thanks a lot for the reply. On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Madhusudan C.S > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> I wanted to fix this bug. I just went through the code to see what >> was

Re: Ticket #8161 - Please help me fix this.

2009-03-11 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Alex, Sorry for wasting your time :( On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Madhusudan C.S wrote: > Hi Alex, > First of all thanks a lot for the reply. > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > >> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Madhusuda

[GSoC] Serialization Refactor

2009-03-20 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi all, I am a prospective GSoC student who is interested in working on Django this summer. I have fully read 2 the mails about GSoC(Malcolm's mail to a prospective student on django-gsoc list and Jacob's mail for all the prospective students on -devel list.) Thanks to both of you for such an in

[GSoC] An Introduction about me

2009-03-20 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi all, This is an introduction about myself. Since Jacob said, "And if we don't know them at all, it's hard to trust they'll get things done." I am writing my involvement in Django and other FOSS communities in general here to let you all know something about me. Hope this helps you people to t

[GSoC] Serialization Refactor

2009-03-20 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi all, I just wrote 2 mails about myself and my wish to participate in GSoC as a Django student. Sorry if I am spamming your inboxes. I just want to keep my mails short so people who don't want to read everything in there can skip the mails that are irrelevant to them. Please correct me where e

Re: [GSoC] Serialization Refactor

2009-03-20 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Malcolm and all, On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick < malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote: > > > I want to work on Serialization Refactor for GSoC. Since what > > the Django community requires exactly from that idea is still > > not clear to me, I am requesting any of you to expla

[GSoC] Ticket #5929 (Previously Serialization Refactor)

2009-03-21 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Malcolm and all, Doesn't ticket #5929 (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5929) look very similar to what I proposed for Python? Allowing Python built in complex datatype objects to be mapped to Relational Database (which includes lists, dictionaries and tuples)? May be an additional abstra

Re: [GSoC] Ticket #5929 (Previously Serialization Refactor)

2009-03-22 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Malcolm, Thanks a lot for replying. On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick < malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote: > > > Hi Malcolm and all, > >Doesn't ticket #5929 (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5929) > > look very similar to what I proposed for Python? Allowing Python >

[GSoC] Proposal for discussion about Serialization requirements and requesting for Review

2009-03-26 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi all, After some discussions with Malcolm on this list and doing some research based on the pointers he gave me I have come up with a rough plan of what I want to do this summer for Django. Since we are running out of time, I have come up with a *rough draft* of the proposal without full disc

Re: Proposal for discussion about Serialization requirements and requesting for Review

2009-03-26 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Koen, On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:35 PM, koenb wrote: > > On 26 mrt, 17:48, "Madhusudan C.S" wrote: > > Hi all, > > [snipped] > > I can't seem to find anything on the problem concerning contenttypes > in your proposal (see [1] for some recent discussi

Re: [GSoC] Proposal for discussion about Serialization requirements and requesting for Review

2009-03-26 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi all, What a blunder :( I submitted my proposal the way I will have to submit to socghop.appspot.com with lines manually wrapped at 80 chars per line and the groups wrapp it at 75 chars making my proposal look as ugly as possible. Did not realize that it was 75 chars here. Please excuse me, tell

Re: [GSoC] Proposal for discussion about Serialization requirements and requesting for Review

2009-03-27 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Malcolm, On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick < malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 00:23 +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > What a blunder :( I submitted my proposal the way I will > > have to subm

Re: [GSoC] Proposal for discussion about Serialization requirements and requesting for Review

2009-03-29 Thread Madhusudan C.S
if the user wants to change only the serialization format i.e notation, nothing else in the entire app? Should he do the donkey's coding job of copy pasting list_separtor and dict_separator? I feel he need not. For that I propose the following. The solution is to define a Serializer class, say

Re: [GSoC] Proposal for discussion about Serialization requirements and requesting for Review

2009-03-29 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hello all, Also I would like to add again that, I am madrazr on #django-dev. Whenever I tried to ask something I haven't got any response till now. I am not complaining, I understand it is mainly because of timezone problems. I just want to inform anyone who wants to tell me directly on my face

Re: [GSoC] Proposal for discussion about Serialization requirements and requesting for Review

2009-04-01 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Russell, After some thinking again, I have re-worked on my proposal and come up with the following idea. Here is my draft proposal. I have also submitted it to socghop.appspot.com Let us consider the following two models for discussion through out: class Poll(models.Model): question