Hi,
This is the mailing list for discussion around developing the actual django
framework, not the use of the framework.
Your request would be better discussed over at django-users
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users .
Cheers,
D
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Pradnya wrote:
> Hello
David,
This mailing list is for the development of the django library itself, not
development WITH the library.
Please direct your question to django-users.
David
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:51 AM, shi shaozhong wrote:
> Is there an equivalent mailling list for WAP?
> I am in need of a very simpl
Hey, in the interest of easing myself into helping out I've picked an easy
ticket to get done.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12074
I've fixed the patch and added tests.
Let me know if I've missed something, or done something wrong :)
Cheers,
David
--
You received this message because
tests.py
D
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:52 PM, David P. Novakovic
> wrote:
> > Hey, in the interest of easing myself into helping out I've picked an
> easy
> > ticket to get done.
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/
rs
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:17 AM, David P. Novakovic wrote:
> Hey Alex,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I actually had checked this with Russ earlier, but
> didn't have a response yet. I prefer TestCases and would be happy to oblige.
>
> I'll move the cases I'm testing
Mornin'
I've attached a patch with unit tests and updated the existing patch.
Let me know if there is anything else I can do on this one.
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-d
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13182
Let me know if there is anything else I can do on this ticket, it is fairly
simple anyway.
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develo
You can basically do this with the "with" statement:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/templates/builtins/?from=olddocs#with
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
> I'm sure this will be met with criticism, but there is a reason why
> just about all template languages allow the
e up to correct me here :)
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
> You absolutely cannot. The "with" statement puts the variable in the
> scope of the "with" statement only, not to mention that would not be
> very explicit at all.
>
> On Aug 26,
Hey dude,
What about something like sentry or lumberjack?
I haven't looked at them too seriously, but I'd imagine there'd be a
way to do smarter summarizing of emails etc..?
D
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Simon Litchfield wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Default behaviour of sending an email on 500 erro
I don't want to sound negative, but answering your own question before
anyone else can doesn't change the answer ;)
D
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
> Is there any plans to incorporate
> http://github.com/SmileyChris/easy-thumbnails/
> into django.contrib? I have seen so many
core.
The real question is not "can it be included?" but why is it a problem
that this is a third party lib at the moment? Is there a strong case
that it be better if it was part of django core or does it do its job
just fine the way it is now?
David
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:09 PM, David
o.
>>>> > I don't think it belongs in the core, but contrib seems like an
>>>> > excellent place for it to go along with the other batteries in the pack.
>>>>
>>>> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Yo-Yo Ma
>>>> > wrote:
As for running different configs:
manage.py runserver --settings=settings_test
etc..
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
>> I'm simply proposing the idea of having the development server
>> explicitly set something to ind
This probably should have been posted to django-users anyway.
Chances are, getting a stacktrace like this one or the last error you
posted are actually problems with your code and not django itself.
Unless you can show that it is actually a problem with django and not
the way you are using it, it
le User object will not suffice. It should say,
> "It takes an HttpRequest object and a User object that has been run
> through the function authenticate() first to alter the auth backends
> that are attached as attributes to it.".
>
> This has very bad code smell, IMHO.
&
ntion
previously.
Thoughts anyone?
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:32 AM, David P. Novakovic
wrote:
> Apart from being slightly offended at you posting a Joel Spolski link
> to make a point, I'll address the actual issue at hand :P
>
> These docs pretty clearly show authenticate happening b
in. For
> instance, passing a variable to the "Development" server to tell it
> you're in "Development" seems a bit redundant, no?
>
> On Sep 23, 3:39 pm, "David P. Novakovic"
> wrote:
>> As for running different configs:
>>
>> manage.p
This link and the comments suggest some good stuff... particularly the
comment from Malcolm and the original post.
http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/08/17/django-settings-in-dev-and-production-why-the-hoops/
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:01 AM, David P. Novakovic
wrote:
> The thing is,
Hey mate,
Great stuff! A cursory glance shows there isn't anything to log debug
output from url resolution.. something I think I need to add.. I'll
busy a ticket for it :)
D
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just uploaded a first draft at a patch int
Is it? I read this as different to anything in the ORM.
This is about conditionally requiring a second field if one is filled
out. Normally it would be done at the JS level.
I think it's a good idea, assuming I haven't missed something that
already does this.
I can't help thinking this is part o
This has probably been discussed at great length previously... but my
2c follows:
If you are using a column/doc store you are trying to solve a
different problem than if you are using an SQL db.
How important is 100% interop? Surely it's about documenting the
differences between them and providin
My problem with all of this is that it feels like a hell of a lot of
hoopjumping to deal with something that could be solved in the
Resolver.
I may be missing something obvious here, so please tell me if I am..
but couldn't the resolver just check that quacks like something
OOViewish has been pass
Sorry in my previous email you could simply pass the uninstantiated
class in the url pattern.
url(r'...',MyOOView,...)
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:57 AM, David P. Novakovic
wrote:
> My problem with all of this is that it feels like a hell of a lot of
> hoopjumping to deal with some
the thread get back on topic :)
I was just considering the possibility of actually providing another
option which is a bit more of a radical change, but also doesn't
involve some quicky ... tweaks..
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Saturday, October 2, 2010,
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Ian Lewis wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>> Not really. The big win from a class-based view is not being able to
>> store state, you can do that with local variables, it's being able to
>> override parts of the behavior without needi
Sorry, I keep top replying in my emails. It's because I'm mostly
taking everything in and not really replying to anyone specifically.
I _really_ like the idea of View being synonymous with a ResponseFactory.
Using __call__:
The view base class can take *args and **kwargs and apply them lazily
wh
Hey,
I've been working on tickets that don't have tests or patches or both,
to help move them along :)
I've found it a good way to get involved with things that aren't too
contentious.
There are a few documentation bugs as well.
Others will certainly have their own take on it too...
David
On
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:21 AM, George Sakkis wrote:
>
> Since dispatch is going to be defined on the base View class, can't we
> omit it from the urlconf and have the URLresolver do:
>
> if isinstance(view, type) and issubclass(view, View):
> view = view.dispatch
Russ mentioned this one ca
Hello, this mailing list is to discuss the development of django itself.
Please use django-users for questions like yours :)
David
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:03 PM, aravind wrote:
> I installed python2.5 and django official
>
> version and also copied admin.py in
>
> scripts but when i use djang
This is certainly an artifact of the fact that messages recent started
supporting anonymous messages. Previously it depended on auth.
I suspect you just need to open a ticket for this.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
> I have a large application that doesn't user contrib.auth, an
Hello,
This is a mailing list to discuss the development of the django
framework itself.
Please post your question to django-users :)
If you find there is an actual bug at play, you may be redirected here..
Cheers,
David
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:54 AM, guilhelm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to cre
Hey, this post is definitely for the django-users mailing list. This mailing
list is solely for the discussion of django development itself. That is,
discussion about development of the core libraries.
Cheers,
David
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Maxim Mai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am really ne
33 matches
Mail list logo
