Re: Query Refactor Update

2010-07-17 Thread DaNmarner
What would the ListField Look like? On Jul 16, 8:06 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote: > Hey all, > > The last while has been spent continuing the fight to make aggregates > work correctly, Russ provided some good insight that's gotten me > farther on it.  All that code is in my query-refactor-aggregates > b

[GSoC] Customizable Serialization Proposal

2011-03-22 Thread DaNmarner
First of all: my native language is not English, so I apologize for any potential natural language error (or any error at all) below. After (briefly) reading through the current implementaion as well as the "Issues to consider" section in the GSoC2011 page on wiki, my initial observation is that t

Re: Customizable Serialization Proposal

2011-04-02 Thread DaNmarner
)) data would contain something similar to what the current XMLSerializer yields except: 1. No votes number. 2. The tag for poll now contains a sublevel tag that has a serialized poll object in it. 3. The text of the choise is in lowercase. And that roughly covers the API design

Re: Customizable Serialization Proposal

2011-04-02 Thread DaNmarner
tSerializedModel() ) } data = serializer.serialize('xml', Choice.objects.all(), SerializedChoice()) data would contain something similar to what the current XMLSerializer yields except: 1. No votes number. 2. The tag for poll now contains a sublevel tag that has a serialize

Re: Customizable Serialization Proposal

2011-04-05 Thread DaNmarner
> 1) It's almost illegible. Between your mail client's munging of line > wrapping, and the completely unreadable code samples, it's very > difficult to tell if you have presented a good idea. Pardon the format. I actually auto-wrapped the text with vim and copy pasted at the first time. Realizing

Re: Customizable Serialization Proposal

2011-04-05 Thread DaNmarner
ts to make Django able to do that in all seriousness, through GSoC or not. On Apr 5, 6:44 pm, DaNmarner wrote: > > 1) It's almost illegible. Between your mail client's munging of line > > wrapping, and the completely unreadable code samples, it's very > > difficul

Re: Customizable Serialization Proposal

2011-04-05 Thread DaNmarner
> So - show me what it would look like. Show me how I, as a third party, > would use your proposed syntax to define output that would match > Django's existing serialization scheme. Yes, this serialization format > will exist as a built in default; but I should be able to reproduce > that format in

Re: Customizable Serialization Proposal

2011-04-05 Thread DaNmarner
> The purpose of this project is to define (and then implement) a DSL > for serialization. If a DSL is what you are looking for, then I withdraw my proposal. The idea of hosting yet another DSL inside Django project scares me a little. I'll just implement my idea as a separate project, I guess.