e if anyone actually reads those posts, as I haven't got a
response in 10 days.
Thanks
Craig de Stigter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/
models/blob/master/LICENSE.txt>
to
the repo to clear up any confusion.
Would other devs be interested in adding something like django-typed-models
to Django core? What kinds of changes would make that more likely?
Cheers
Craig de Stigter
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Krzysztof Jurew
een unable to reproduce the bug on a
dev server, and I'm not comfortable with doing `git bisect` on our
production box ;)
I've tried using Dozer to track down the leak but it appears to cause
apache to segfault with annoying regularity before finding anything of
consequence.
Any tips
Karen Tracey saves the day!
Thanks so much, seems likely that's it :)
Craig de Stigter
On Friday, March 22, 2013 2:25:04 PM UTC+13, Karen Tracey wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Craig de Stigter
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> (cross-p
Karen Tracey saves the day!
Thanks so much, seems likely that's it :)
Craig de Stigter
On Friday, March 22, 2013 2:25:04 PM UTC+13, Karen Tracey wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Craig de Stigter
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> (cross-p
Just confirming that this fixed the memory leak problem for us. Thanks
again :)
On Friday, March 22, 2013 3:07:02 PM UTC+13, Craig de Stigter wrote:
>
> Karen Tracey saves the day!
>
> Thanks so much, seems likely that's it :)
>
> Craig de Stigter
>
> On Friday, Mar
. Does anyone have any suggestions? Or,
perhaps there's a reason why this hasn't been done previously that you more
experienced gurus could illuminate?
Thanks in advance
Craig de Stigter
Maintainer of django-mptt and full time dev at koordinates.com
--
You received this message becau
I realise everyone's been busy with getting 1.3 ready, but doesn't anyone
have thoughts on this? It's been two weeks ...
Thanks
Craig
On Thursday, February 17, 2011 11:08:57 PM UTC+13, Craig de Stigter wrote:
>
> Hi folks
>
> Ever since Django started suppor
Hi guys
Thanks for pointing those out. I knew I couldn't have been the first to want
this. I guess I just didn't know the right words to search for here.
It looks like django_polymorphic does what I want. I'm not yet sure why it
says it takes one query per type of model in a queryset. Unless it
Since multi-table-inheritance is the only kind of inheritance (apart
from abstract/proxy) supported by Django's ORM, I don't know what
other type of inheritance django_polymorphic would be referring to...
As per my original post, I want to store everything in one table (all
subclasses have t
de.djangoproject.com/ticket/22690>. I'd love to see
better support for this in Django core.
Regards
Craig de Stigter
On Thursday, 22 May 2014 21:02:48 UTC+12, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote:
>
> On 05/22/2014 11:13 AM, Shai Berger wrote:
> >> Any thoughts on this idea?
> &
supported stuff that the core devs
could decide to break at any time.
But it's a better solution to certain problems than MTI is, and it doesn't
deserve the bashing that some people seem to give it. Use the right tool
for the job. If that's STI then use STI :)
Craig de Stigter
On
Has there been any discussion about this previously? I haven't found any.
Thanks
Craig de Stigter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
13 matches
Mail list logo
