I'm not sure this is so cut and dry. For two reasons:
1) If a project has a lot of databases configured, created and ending a
transaction in all of them for every request/response cycle could get
expensive, and following that:
2) This is enough of a change in behavior that it shouldn't just be
On May 18, 2012 4:43 AM, "Anssi Kääriäinen" wrote:
>
> A heads up: I am working on Git and Github usage guidelines. There is
> a ticket https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18307, and I have a
> github branch with some initial work
https://github.com/akaariai/django/tree/django_git_guidelines
> (
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen
wrote:
> On May 18, 1:44 pm, Calvin Spealman wrote:
>> > - When upstream has changed use git rebase instead of git pull
>>
>> A rebase workflow has always been problematic, in my experience. It will
>> cause prev
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Horst Gutmann wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Giovanni Collazo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So, I spend a few hours working on the re-design following Idan's
>> Guidelines. Any feedback and further direction from the core team would be
>> greatly appreciated.
>>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Jonathan Slenders
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This may be interesting to some of you. I created a small library for
> inheritance of a set of models.
> It's best to go quickly through the Readme on the site below.
>
> We felt a need for this, but I'm wondering whethe
On Apr 22, 2013 7:15 AM, "Tom Christie" wrote:
>
> I'd be interested to know what you folks think of this proposal.
>
> SingleObjectMixin currently exposes these three attributes and one method
all dealing with queryset filter arguments...
>
> * pk_url_kwarg = 'pk'
> * slug_field = 'slug'
> * slug
-1 On django manipulating PYTHONPATH
+1 On encouraging people to keep their applications out of their project!
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Tai Lee wrote:
> If we're talking about the lowest common denominator and keeping
> things simple, this is what I think we'd have:
>
> myapp1/
> myapp2/
+1
No harm, as it breaks nothing currently using the templates.
Sets a great message that Django moves forward. I like it.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to put forward the proposal that we switch to HTML5 for all
> Django supplied templates in Django
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Jody McIntyre wrote:
> We need to be able to disable choices in a , which is done by
> setting the disabled attribute on the tag, for example:
> Bananas
>
> Currently we're doing this by subclassing the Select widget:
> http://djangosnippets.org/snippets/2453/
>
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Jody McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Calvin Spealman
> wrote:
>>
>> > 1. Backwards compatibility is already addressed. If the widget is
>> > passed a
>> > regular "choices" field, the existing
On Sep 20, 2011 5:18 AM, "James Pic" wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> Sorry if this topic has already been brought, I asked about it on IRC but
nobody answered.
>
> Being a old user of xUnit patterns in several languages, i just figured
that there might be a mistake in django testing documentation
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Johannes Dollinger
wrote:
> The aim of this proposal is to reuse Q objects for models that are related
> through FK or M2M fields.
> A simplified example would be a Q object like
>
> >>> is_blue = Q(blue=True)
> >>> Thing.objects.filter(is_blue)
>
> that sho
I'm trying to build a test suite in my project and I'm making heavy
use of mocks to write them cleanly. Testing has reached a point where
I need to mock the fkey property of a model instance, but I'd really
like to use this as a mock. Of course, I can't assign the mock here
because it isn't an ins
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 18:55 -0700, Calvin Spealman wrote:
> > I'm trying to build a test suite in my project and I'm making heavy
> > use of mocks to write them cleanly. Te
Thanks for all the input and response everyone.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 05:49 -0400, Calvin Spealman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick
> >
You could also have a common parent class for Robot and User, and use that
as your foreign key type. Which type is referenced would be your
determination of user type.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 6:19 AM, CooLMaN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an application with a model similar to
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:18 PM, oggie rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > {% for item in grocery_list %}
> > {{ item }}
> > {% default %}
> > Nothing to buy.
> > {% endfor %}
>
> Please, though - use {% else %}. Its totally clear what its referring
> to and else doesn't mean squat unless yo
ed Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> But this does operate the same as the Python for/else, no?
>
> >>> for i in []:
> ... print "boo"
> ... else:
> ... print "foo"
> ...
> foo
> >>>
>
> --Ned.
> http://n
1 for else
The template language may not be sold as "python in html" but there are
still obvious relationships between the constructs the two share. Breaking
assumptions then simply isn't good for anyone involved.
+1 for a default, -1 for calling it else
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:4
+1
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Siddhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So here is the situation:
>
> I have a middleware installed that looks at the HTTP_HOST header and
> stores the domain and subdomain into the request object. Now when
> running unit tests, the tests fail because the HTTP_HOS
Does it need to be multi-threaded? Can you get a multi-process dev
server instead/also?
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3357 should be given
> another look at enabling optional multi-threading on the dev server.
>
The last thing new people need when they come in and start playing
around with the dev server is to worry about all the issues that can
come up with threading. I would never recommend to anyone who doesn't
really know what they're doing and anyone who does can easily use any
one of the number of s
Using the caching api backed by memcache, i started hitting the 1MB
object size limit of memcache and I was thinking of a way around it by
storing a list of keys to segments of the full object, each up to 1MB
each. I figure this will raise the limit to 15GB and that had better
be large enough for
I'm looking for the best way to query based on the existence of an
instance of a subclass. In my case, there are Actions that have
several subclasses, like FriendRequest, PhotosTagged, etc. The user
has selected a set of types they are interested in, so I need to query
for all the actions that are
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 11:08 -0500, Calvin Spealman wrote:
>> I'm looking for the best way to query based on the existence of an
>> instance of a subclass. In my case, there are Actions that have
>
consideration.
> On 27 Feb, 14:13, Calvin Spealman wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick
>>
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 11:08 -0500, Calvin Spealman wrote:
>> >> I'm looking for the best
26 matches
Mail list logo
