Permission to discuss

2021-01-19 Thread Benny
as to not violate any spamming/advertising policy, I’d like to ask permission before launching an email to either (or both) groups. And to that point, would permission to discuss here apply to the users group, or should I ask there as well? Best, Benny -- You received this message because you

Re: Permission to discuss

2021-01-19 Thread Benny
Thanks for your quick responses. Adam, I was not even aware of the Show & Tell section. I’ll definitely look into that. Benny > On Jan 19, 2021, at 4:20 PM, Adam Johnson wrote: > >  > I don't think that's appropriate to post on either mailing list. These > ma

Re: Do people actually squash migrations?

2021-05-11 Thread Benny
of projects. Benny > On May 11, 2021, at 7:50 PM, 'Mike Lissner' via Django developers > (Contributions to Django itself) wrote: >  > I have a pretty big django project, and since I created the 100th migration > within one of its apps today, I thought I'd

Re: Idea

2021-09-15 Thread Benny
if you really need them both. I’d recommend digging around in the guts of Django. You’ll find some pretty neat things there! Just my 2 cents, Benny > On Sep 15, 2021, at 6:36 PM, Michael Urban wrote: > >  > For YEARS I’ve wanted a REST solution included with Django. DRF

Re: Why can't range function be added in templates?

2021-10-09 Thread Benny
in group` then `for j in i.game` - you could add something like `for k in j.squad_entry_members`. This would skip the need for a range, fall within the system specs, and gets you a free counter without having to know the specific size. Benny > On Oct 9, 2021, at 5:45 AM, 'Adam John

Re: Case Sensitive Usernames

2021-12-12 Thread Benny
production environment. Normalization is a nightmare all on its own without having to implicitly introduce it. Benny > On Dec 12, 2021, at 9:40 PM, Kye Russell wrote: > > Strong -1 on overriding user intent on capitalisation, especially for email > addresses as the RFC stipula

Re: Case Sensitive Usernames

2021-12-12 Thread Benny
. Benny > On Dec 12, 2021, at 10:15 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > The current behaviour is an undocumented gotcha. It should at least be > mentioned in the documentation. Very few major login based platforms are case > sensitive, so it should be at least mentioned in the docume

Re: GDAPS

2019-06-16 Thread Benny
Long time lurker first time poster; could this possibly be addressed with something along the lines of SECRET_KEY? It seems to me that no more of a namespace would be needed than a uniquely identifying hash per app/module. Not so much in settings or app_config as __init__, maybe? Hi, Benny