Hi,
Is this thread still the most up to date place for discussing this? I'm
trying to work out what the current status is and whether it is likely to
land in 1.9.
For the benefit of anyone else coming to this late here's what I can track
down:
Last comment here prior to mine was jezdez on Apr
Happy to do some work on this but wanted to get some feedback first.
Loose methodology:
1. Skim the most popular admin extensions that exist on django-packages etc
2. Look out for places where they've had to copy entire admin templates to
only override a small part
3. Add new {% blocks%} into t
t;> https://code.djangoproject.com/query?status=assigned&status=new&component=contrib.admin&stage=Accepted&page=2&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=version&desc=1&order=id
>>>
>>> I am not sure how much value do
gt; can think of. Send a pull request after changing a few templates so we can
> get a flavor and see if you are on the right track.
>
> We don't have a big problem with trivial patches like this languishing.
>
> On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 10:43:38 AM UTC-4, Andy Baker wrote:
&g
I do a lot of projects with highly customized admins and having the full
font awesome would be splendid.
One option is to use optional requirements: pip install django[all-icons]
but I don't think Django does this anywhere else so it's probably a big
leap for a small part of contrib.admin
Maybe
I'll file a ticket but I wanted a quick sanity check first.
In db.models.fields.Field there is a method called get_flatchoices (as well
as _get_flatchoices which is turned into a property).
I've searched the source for 'get_flatchoices' and it's never called. There
doesn't appear to be any ment
Mmmm. That's a fair point but that article was written before web
applications were so application-ey and expectations may well have
changed. (I've noticed a lot of semi-modal dialogs in web apps
complete with 'cancel' buttons and with javascript dialogs the back
button doesn't do what Jakob impli
This sounds really interesting. Is there anything about this in writing?
I'm not a fan of listening to audio on tech subjects (must... skim...
read...). Not sure if anyone else shares this prejudice but do post here if
there is a follow-up blog post or similar.
--
You received this message bec
Hi,
I was about to start a discussion about a patch I'd like to contribute when
I remembered there is a rule about contributions.
Is it the '5 for 1' rule? Something like that - the regulars here will know
immediately what it is I'm trying to remember!
I did try and find it
here: https://docs
I really like Thiago's new skin and I love the fact it's CSS only.
The key thing to remember in any discussion about updating the admin is
that there are three levels:
1. CSS/Static only - little to no breakage of 3rd party apps
2. Updated HTML - many apps that overrride admin templates or rely
I can't help but feel that the "admin is very rudimentary and hard to
customize" is perpetually overplayed by many in the community. Maybe I'm
suffering Stockholm Syndrome but I'd like to raise a dissenting voice.
I find it the quickest and most efficient way to provide an admin interface
for s
more general Django features can be glued
together.
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 13:55:02 UTC, Andy Baker wrote:
>
> I can't help but feel that the "admin is very rudimentary and hard to
> customize" is perpetually overplayed by many in the community. Maybe I'm
>
ces
on this rather monolithic
page: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.9/ref/contrib/admin/
A single 'common ways to customize the admin' page could go a long way to
helping here.
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 01:33:03 UTC, Curtis Maloney wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/02/16 00:
to add these incredibly common
>> features. This is probably one of my favorite things about the django
>> framework.
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 5:33:03 PM UTC-8, Curtis Maloney wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/02/16 00:55, Andy B
In a few cases I've had to do filtering in Python because it wasn't possible
purely at the db level. (mainly in cases where I'm expected small result sets
obviously). I'd like to see this remain possible with any future changes.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Actually - my recollection was faulty. As the queryset method always has to
return a queryset (dur) I am not sure that I'm actually doing anything that
couldn't be expressed as a Q object. I'm just doing some funky stuff to get my
queryset in shape.
So I suppose my question is this - are there
16 matches
Mail list logo
