Django bugfix release: 3.2.8

Details are available on the Django project weblog: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/oct/05/bugfix-release/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contribution

Re: Custom Groups model and interoperability

No official (or semi-official) position on this? Is "The right way to create custom Groups" simply undefined in Django? Thanks. On Sunday, October 3, 2021 at 10:27:36 PM UTC-7 Scot Hacker wrote: > I asked this question on django-users and got no response. Thought I might > have better luck

Re: Custom Groups model and interoperability

Hello, The semi-official position is "create a separate model with a FK to the auth.Group". I know that's less than helpful. At least you know that there's nothing better built-in. -- Aymeric. PS: `{% block content %}` doesn't provide a meaningful level of interoperability. The semi-official

Re: DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD

Hi, As far as I know this is why BigAutoField is for. I guess the AutoField is there for backwards compatibility. -- Pavlos Georgiadis On 4/10/21 11:58, אורי wrote: Hi, Are there any intentions to make DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD and django.db.models.AutoField a 64-bit integers in future versions

Re: Custom Groups model and interoperability

Thanks very much for the response Aymeric. Seems like a bit of a gray area that could use some form of recommendation - like in a "Best Practices" section of the documentation? In any case, thanks again. Scot On Tuesday, October 5, 2021 at 1:13:47 PM UTC-7 Aymeric Augustin wrote: > Hello, > >