On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:31 AM Johannes Hoppe
wrote:
> Hey Tom,
>
> Good to hear for you and very good points. I'll leave you a couple of
> inline comments:
>
> On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:04:50 AM UTC+9, Tom Forbes wrote:
>>
>> This is fantastic! Thank you Johannes! Regarding sqlite MacOS
Good idea Carlton, here you go
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30964#ticket
On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 3:03:58 AM UTC+9, Carlton Gibson wrote:
>
> Please open an issue for the macOS failure. It’s been passing for me all
> week so... 🤔
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 17:31, Johannes Hoppe >
@Tom, I stared to adapt some of your suggestions. Not done yet, I need to
wait for more log output from PostgeSQL to identify why it's stuck.
I'll put in more work later today (UTC+9). I'll also open up a pull-request
somewhere to allow line wise comments and suggestions.
@Matematica, good points
I see. Well, I think I would be for supporting Python 3.8 in that case.
Maybe it makes sense to add Python nightly build tests to those braches to
make sure we catch issues early and it doesn't become an overwhelming task.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, 05:02 Jani Tiainen wrote:
> Problem is that Python.o
> I see. Well, I think I would be for supporting Python 3.8 in that case.
> Maybe it makes sense to add Python nightly build tests to those braches to
> make sure we catch issues early and it doesn't become an overwhelming task.
>
We have such jobs https://djangoci.com/view/Main/
--
You rece
I put in a little effort and tried a couple of conceptual things.
1. YAML anchors, inheritance and includes are not yet supported by GitHub
actions.
2. You can build dependent builds, or build stages, but you will need to
keep everything in one file. (This gets messy without anchors & co).
3. You
Ok, I have one more insight.
I added all databases (except Oracle) and altered the job matrix to reflect
the current setup (why don't we test on macOS again?)
Results can be found here:
https://github.com/codingjoe/django/commit/386f5eb04dc0ae9424bcb1e1198ed7752cd9c10c/checks?check_suite_id=3003
This is fantastic! Thank you Johannes! Regarding sqlite MacOS and Windows
tests, this is historical AFAIK (we don’t have the resources). With this we
should test MacOS and Windows as part of the Sqlite matrix (i.e all python
versions).
A few notes:
1. We need to change the test runner output t
Hey Tom,
Good to hear for you and very good points. I'll leave you a couple of
inline comments:
On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:04:50 AM UTC+9, Tom Forbes wrote:
>
> This is fantastic! Thank you Johannes! Regarding sqlite MacOS and Windows
> tests, this is historical AFAIK (we don’t have the r
Please open an issue for the macOS failure. It’s been passing for me all
week so... 🤔
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 17:31, Johannes Hoppe wrote:
> Hey Tom,
>
> Good to hear for you and very good points. I'll leave you a couple of
> inline comments:
>
> On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:04:50 AM UTC+9, To
10 matches
Mail list logo