Is it going to be easy to adjust the semantics of SECRET_KEY to support
sequences like that? I’d imagine a lot of third party packages that expect
SECRET_KEY to be a string would break in weird ways (thanks to both strings
and tuples of strings being iterables that yield strings).
Here’s a quick s
Good point, I can think of at least two apps of mine that would break.
Transitioning to a new setting makes more sense.
--
Aymeric.
> On 11 Nov 2018, at 18:58, Tom Forbes wrote:
>
> Is it going to be easy to adjust the semantics of SECRET_KEY to support
> sequences like that? I’d imagine a
