Re: New deferred loading implementation (Was: [Review Request] Added support for database delegated fields (like AutoField))

2016-11-07 Thread Joachim Jablon
So the PR followed here : https://github.com/django/django/pull/7515 The PR is based on the idea defined by Ben just above. It raised 2 questions which I'd like to bring to your attention : 1. When inserting or updating a model instance that contains one or more readonly fields, should we fetch

Re: New deferred loading implementation (Was: [Review Request] Added support for database delegated fields (like AutoField))

2016-11-07 Thread Aymeric Augustin
On 7 Nov 2016, at 13:44, Joachim Jablon wrote: > My own personal opinion: 1. refesh by default, add an argument to > "model_instance.save()" to opt-out. 2. readonly I agree. -- Aymeric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contri

Re: RFC: DEP 7 - dependency policy

2016-11-07 Thread Thomas Fuller
There's a fragment in the policy list of the abstract: rough consensus among the community and core team that the chosen dependency I assume that phrase should end with "is needed" -Thomas On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:20 AM Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > W dniu sobota, 5 listopada 2016 13:24:28 UTC+