On 2 mars 2014, at 02:40, Josh Smeaton wrote:
> At the very least it might be a good middle ground to tag PRs with "Requires
> Work" or "Not Ready", so they can be easily filtered out from "active" PRs.
> On the other hand, there could be a strange mix of Trac and the PR queue
> containing con
On 2 mars 2014, at 08:49, Shai Berger wrote:
> On Saturday 01 March 2014 19:07:08 Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
>> You should never, ever, for any reason, use a different database in
>> development, test and production. It's a bad idea. It doesn't work.
>>
> ... except when you're developing for mo
On Sunday 02 March 2014 10:24:13 Aymeric Augustin wrote:
> On 2 mars 2014, at 08:49, Shai Berger wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 March 2014 19:07:08 Aymeric Augustin wrote:
> >> You should never, ever, for any reason, use a different database in
> >> development, test and production. It's a bad idea. It
Good points all.
Looking more closely at Trac, the combinations of "has patch" "patch needs
improvement" and "ready for checkin" fields should cover the status of PRs.
I'll try to set some time aside to go through the PRs and check that the
status in Trac matches. Though thinking about it, goin
On 2 mars 2014, at 09:59, Josh Smeaton wrote:
> Is there anyway of indicating that a patch needs a review? Or is simply
> setting "ready for checkin" a good enough signal?
"Ready for checkin" means that you have reviewed the patch and you think it's
complete and correct.
If the patch applies
I wasn't expressing an opinion either way; just adding the relevant
commit to the conversation.
Looks like RFC 3986 is the relevant RFC describing the permitted
characters in URIs, specifically section 2.2 and 2.3 -
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-2.2
It seems like the fix makes it eas
Now that formset_factory() from 1.7 accept num_min and validate_min
arguments, shouldn't modelformset_factory() also support those same
arguments to allow them to be passed onto formset_factory()?
*Anders Steinlein*
*Eliksir AS*
http://e5r.no
E-post: and...@e5r.no
Mobil: +47 926 13 069
Twitter: @
Yes, see https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17642. If you can bring the
patch up to date in the next day or two, I'll try to help review and commit
it.
> On Sunday, March 2, 2014 2:05:56 PM UTC-5, Anders Steinlein wrote:
Now that formset_factory() from 1.7 accept num_min and validate_min
>
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Tim Graham wrote:
> Yes, see https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17642. If you can bring
> the patch up to date in the next day or two, I'll try to help review and
> commit it.
>
Thanks. I'll try to get that done.
Cheers,
Anders
--
You received this message b
I know python, c,c ++ and trying to learn django.
Can you(mentors) tell me what more i should learn to join this project.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 12:34:29 PM UTC-8, sameer kumar wrote:
>
> I know python, c,c ++ and trying to learn django.
> Can you(mentors) tell me what more i should learn to join this project.
>
While it might take a while for someone to become a core Django developer,
anyone can contribute to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
