My testing of remote mssql is proceeding nicely, or was until a few days
ago. After much debugging it looks like my database proxy server may be
running out of worker threads: it uses one for each cursor. My traces show
that, when running the test suite in django-mssql (using ./manage.py test)
Shai:
I think that you are showing how rotten this whole "paramstyle" mess is:
the thing you are describing is, IIUC, "pyformat" paramstyle. "named" uses
a ":name" SQL statement syntax, and expects a mapping of parameters. My
understanding was that Oracle expected that one. I am only an eg
Hi Vernon,
On 17 mai 2013, at 13:26, VernonCole wrote:
> After much debugging it looks like my database proxy server may be running
> out of worker threads: it uses one for each cursor.
With DB-API adapters, the connections are expected to be expensive and cursors
cheap. (If this sounds obs
Hello GSoC Mentors,
As you are participating to Google Summer of Code, I'm wondering if you
could consider using Flower Dev Center [1] while working with students.
Flower Dev Center is an online platform for UML modeling diagramming,
with a strong focus on code synchronization, integration wi
django-developers has over 7500 subscribers. Your message is relevant to at
most 4 of them. Unless it was plain spam. In either case, that's not cool,
avoid that in the future.
--
Aymeric.
On 16 mai 2013, at 11:51, Flower Platform Team
wrote:
> Hello GSoC Mentors,
>
> As you are particip
Right now Django absolutely does not close all cursors, if you look at
django/db/models/sql/compiler.py def execute_sql (sorry, going from memory
here) you'll see this. It'd be good if it did. There used to be some crazy
stuff around reading chunks and emitting those, now that I believe Anssi
has r
On 17 touko, 16:47, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Right now Django absolutely does not close all cursors, if you look at
> django/db/models/sql/compiler.py def execute_sql (sorry, going from memory
> here) you'll see this. It'd be good if it did. There used to be some crazy
> stuff around reading chunks an
Hi Emil,
On May 16, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Emil Stenström wrote:
> Any feedback on how I was thinking? Does it make sense?
>
> Based on the feedback so far I gather that changing the block tag is a bad
> idea. I'd love to continue working on this, because I've felt this need in
> lots of different
