On 13 joulu, 22:11, Emil Stenström wrote:
> I just thinking out loud here but: what if another thread does something to
> the previously loaded object? I'm not sure if Django has concurrency tests
> build into the test suite, but if it hasn't it could explain why the code
> is written as it is.
I
Yeah, I agree, as it is, I can't see any reason why I would use it, but I
could see it being useful with some modifications such as:
1) Being able to create redirects (which seems to already be on the
todo-list)
2) Being able to specify extra kwargs to pass to a view so that it would be
possibl
Hello everyone
I've tried getting my question answered by the folks over django-users but
when searching the archives I didn't feel that I would get a sufficient
response there.
On my current project I need a mix of builtin Django authentication and
oAuth2 sources. But when writing a custom a
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:54:10 AM UTC-8, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>
> I am strongly against showing non-supported versions on PYPI, I also don't
> see why you'd need 1.1 for CI tests if you don't use it (an nobody should)
>
I disagree. I have a client who is currently running a site wit
> 1) Being able to create redirects (which seems to already be on the
> todo-list)
Creating temporary 302 redirects are currently possibly right now. The
TODO is for being able to specify both 301 and 302 redirects through
the admin.
> 2) Being able to specify extra kwargs to pass to a view so t
Since this isn't really appropriate for django-dev, could we move any
further discussion on this over to the django-users group, please?
Many thanks!
Tom
On Sunday, 16 December 2012 18:53:43 UTC, Zach Borboa wrote:
>
> > 1) Being able to create redirects (which seems to already be on the
> >
Hello,
Since all major browsers now support SVG [1], I've replaced two images in the
docs with SVG versions [2] [3]. This isn't a new idea [4].
[1] http://caniuse.com/#feat=svg
[2]
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/http/middleware/#hooks-and-application-order
[3] https://docs.djangop
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 12:39:13 AM UTC-8, Michael Anckaert wrote:
>
> Hello everyone
>
> I've tried getting my question answered by the folks over django-users but
> when searching the archives I didn't feel that I would get a sufficient
> response there.
>
This list is not the place to
The point is that you should be using 1.1.4, the latest release in the 1.1
line, and not 1.1.
Jacob
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, donarb wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:54:10 AM UTC-8, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>>
>> I am strongly against showing non-supported versions on PYPI
