On 27/03/12 11:01, Florian Apolloner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 7:09:44 AM UTC+2, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>
> For a moment, I thought we could have some more of that magic and
> amend the commits in git, so that "author" would be the patch
> contributor and commit autho
On Monday, March 26, 2012 7:57:02 PM UTC-7, Nauho Zen wrote:
>
> I have reformated my proposal content on this group, any suggestion?
>
Thank your for taking the time to consider this project, hopefully you will
get some other feedback than just mine - I'm not sure that many projects
are wort
> Thank your for taking the time to consider this project, hopefully you
> will get some other feedback than just mine - I'm not sure that many
> projects are worthy of *two* GSOC projects myself.
>
I don't know, but I think GSOC still offers a good chance to finish off the
people's valuable work o
Just a quick note to everyone to say that the student application period
for GSOC is now open, and closes on Friday, 6th April.
As I've mentioned on this list previously, please discuss your
applications with us first so we can give you some feedback rather than
just submitting them directly -
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Nauho Zen wrote:
> > I believe that the baton was somewhat passed to tswicegood at pycon, see:
> >
> > https://github.com/tswicegood/django/commit/241c455d9b8d03144a24f869f819efda031813ba
> >
>
> I will take a good look at it.
The best place to start
> Before I go into any further specifics, one thing I want to do (whether this
> makes it into GSoC or not) is make sure that we keep the scope reigned in on
> this merge. From my point-of-view (and hopefully Jannis will correct me if
> I'm off) these are the things this branch should do:
>
> * In
