Re: Custom transform in django docs

2011-10-13 Thread Ramiro Morales
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Luke Plant wrote: > > Ah, well that explains it! It's gone now :-) Belated +1 to this -- Great finding and fix Luke. But it seems this is affecting styling of locally generated builds of the HTML version of the docs. Fon an example see (from tutorial part #1) h

Re: Proposal for a new templatetag definition syntax

2011-10-13 Thread LeeS
Not sure if this is still an ongoing discussion, but I prefer to write all new tags with a simple syntax that matches Python. There's no real advantage in defining a unique, custom syntax for a template tag. All HTML authors are already familiar with Python's kwargs syntax, since it exactly match

Re: Towards a more friendly NoReverseMatch

2011-10-13 Thread Philippe Raoult
+1 on this, been bitten repeatedly. I assume the url parser already "knows" this so this is mostly a matter of raising the appropriate exception. Bien cordialement, Philippe On 12 October 2011 17:13, Wilfred Hughes wrote: >> >    >>> reverse('i_dont_exist') >> >    NoReverseMatch: Reverse for

Re: Custom transform in django docs

2011-10-13 Thread Carl Meyer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ramiro, On 10/13/2011 05:35 AM, Ramiro Morales wrote: > Belated +1 to this -- Great finding and fix Luke. Indeed. > But it seems this is affecting styling of locally generated builds of > the HTML version of the docs. > > Fon an example see (fro

Re: Proposal for a new templatetag definition syntax

2011-10-13 Thread Julien Phalip
On 13 October 2011 15:30, LeeS wrote: > Not sure if this is still an ongoing discussion, but I prefer to write > all new tags with a simple syntax that matches Python. There's no > real advantage in defining a unique, custom syntax for a template > tag. > > All HTML authors are already familiar

Re: Custom transform in django docs

2011-10-13 Thread Luke Plant
Hi Ramiro, > Belated +1 to this -- Great finding and fix Luke. > > But it seems this is affecting styling of locally generated builds of > the HTML version of the docs. > > Fon an example see (from tutorial part #1) http://i.imgur.com/CQrjo.png > > Compare that with: > > https://docs.djangopr

Re: Update on Ticket #16891: Delete/update should return number of rows modified

2011-10-13 Thread Steven Cummings
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > > Now I have the feeling that I have gone through this exact same > discussion before, and have had the exact same misunderstanding, too, > before. So, sorry for that... > It's cool. Better to make sure we're all clear here on the differen