On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
> To be blunt, you are actually asking a lot for them to host detailed
> documentation on uWSGI integration on the Django site for every possible way
> it can be setup. I haven't even managed to get much more than minimal setup
> instructions
> To be blunt, you are actually asking a lot for them to host detailed
> documentation on uWSGI integration on the Django site for every possible
> way
> it can be setup. I haven't even managed to get much more than minimal
> setup
> instructions for mod_wsgi into the official Django documentation
On Saturday, April 9, 2011 5:35:14 PM UTC+10, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Graham Dumpleton
> wrote:
> > To be blunt, you are actually asking a lot for them to host detailed
> > documentation on uWSGI integration on the Django site for every possible
> way
> >
I've created two patches implementing this strategy, and attached them
to ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7704.
--Ned.
On 4/4/2011 5:15 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Last week I re-encountered the problems with using makemessages on
Javascript files, and lost a couple of half-days to t
Hi,
Maybe it's a stupid issue but I think the error message is not clear or I am
missing something about the dummy db.backend. Why if you set an error
database backend the error message is the next one?
Try using django.db.backends.XXX, where XXX is one of:
'dummy', 'mysql', 'oracle', 'postgre
On 09.04.2011, at 16:14, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> I've created two patches implementing this strategy, and attached them to
> ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7704.
Thanks Ned, but I'm a bit confused, I thought we agreed that Babel should be
the way to go, since adding an own JavaScr
On 4/9/2011 10:43 AM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
On 09.04.2011, at 16:14, Ned Batchelder wrote:
I've created two patches implementing this strategy, and attached them to
ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7704.
Thanks Ned, but I'm a bit confused, I thought we agreed that Babel should be
t
On 05.04.2011, at 13:39, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> Jannis and Łukasz have both suggested the same thing: use Babel instead of
> xgettext. I understand why: it's a more complete solution than what I have
> proposed, which is at heart still a way to trick xgettext into parsing source
> code it doe
On 09.04.2011, at 17:32, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 4/9/2011 10:43 AM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
>> On 09.04.2011, at 16:14, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>>
>>> I've created two patches implementing this strategy, and attached them to
>>> ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7704.
>> Thanks Ned, but
On 4/9/2011 11:57 AM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
On 09.04.2011, at 17:32, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:43 AM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
On 09.04.2011, at 16:14, Ned Batchelder wrote:
I've created two patches implementing this strategy, and attached them to
ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/
10 matches
Mail list logo
