Hi Jacob,
Rajeev pinpointed the use case. The company I work for has a large bit of
infrastructure built around Django. Our main project consists of 6 apps,
each of which has a defined role (with respect to the other apps). One of
our apps has quite a few models and quite a bit a logic around thos
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:54 AM, shacker wrote:
> ... except that it's not working just fine (because of this dependency
> on Grappelli).
That sounds like a problem with the 3rd party app, not something that would
be resolved by incorporating it in Django proper. That said, as Russell
suggests,
On 29 jul, 20:29, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> ...
> Russ Magee %-)
Just a tip from an absolute beginner:
Google since the beginning of the app engine gave support to Django,
today, after about two years, Django still does not support GAE.
How is it possible that after so long even the Dja
Hi Vito --
First, can you please do us all a favor and stop starting new threads?
If you'll just reply to the existing threads it's much easier for
everyone to track what's going on.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Vito wrote:
> Google since the beginning of the app engine gave support to Djan
>
> Vito, I know you're trying to help, but at this point your coming
> across with a strong tone of entitlement, and you're chastising us
> without actually having contributed anything concrete. If you really
> want to help, then contribute.
>
I have to agree with Jacob here (not that my opinion
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Django has a bunch of part time engineers and no budget.
That should have read *volunteers* -- the point is that not a single
person gets paid to work on Django.
Jacob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
Sorry for changing the title and starting new threads, remember that I
am a beginner.
I do not speak English, the translation is done by a software, so
please interpret the best way. Do not mean to annoy anyone, on the
contrary, I am very happy to be exchanging words with some major
developers of
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Vito wrote:
> > Google since the beginning of the app engine gave support to Django,
> > today, after about two years, Django still does not support GAE.
>
> Vito, I know you're trying to help, but at t
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Hooshyar Naraghi wrote:
>
> anyone who wishes to take _this_ Django and fork
> it into a _new_ Dmango, can do it any time?
>
The devs here _extremely_ patient with whiners [1].
m
[1] People with lots of ideas about how you should
spend your free time, and spend
[2] People who do have ideas and do write code, but still get rejected
because their ideas don't conform to whatever the core devs need in
their websites.
See? It works both ways.
Nice job scaring that poor guy who was just trying to be helpful. His
first post is met with so much hostility and el
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> The devs here _extremely_ patient with whiners [1].
>
> m
>
> [1] People with lots of ideas about how you should
> spend your free time, and spend hours writing emails
> trying to convince you how smart they are, but can't
> be bothered to
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Nice job scaring that poor guy who was just trying to be helpful. His
> first post is met with so much hostility and elitism, I can't imagine
> being him right now.
Could you please quote where you felt I was "hostile" or "elitist"?
Priva
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> [2] People who do have ideas and do write code, but still get rejected
> because their ideas don't conform to whatever the core devs need in
> their websites.
I don't think that's a fair criticism at all.
> ...
> Nice job scaring that po
You were not, but most of the followup answers were definitely
hostile, especially after the guy apologized and explained his
situation. I've no beef with the developers, but the general tone of
this mailing list has turned extremely sore over the months.
J. Leclanche
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10
> Ignoring language and newbie barriers, it was not a django-dev post,
> and clearly had no spark of idea. I think jacob and others are
> extremely fair and tolerant in moderating this list.
>
I agree, it should have been posted on django-users. But (this subject
came up before) it could just as
Hi, I've been profiling Django to see how much overhead is being added
by ORM, and found a very strange case of memory usage(which is either
some kind of bug or me misunderstanding low level stuff) - as long as
I have 0 to 3 fields of any type - memory usage is around 45MB ( I
create list of 100 00
Just to clarify, I am talking about model fields :)
class U(models.Model):
name = models.TextField(max_length = 255, blank = False)
name2 = models.TextField(max_length = 255, blank = False)
name3 = models.TextField(max_length = 255, blank = False)
#name4 = models.TextField(max_len
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:59 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> Hi, I've been profiling Django to see how much overhead is being added
> by ORM, and found a very strange case of memory usage(which is either
> some kind of bug or me misunderstanding low level stuff) - as long as
> I have 0 to 3 fields of any ty
Oh, and I am using latest Django svn but can reproduce this with 1.1
too
On Jul 31, 3:17 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:59 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> > Hi, I've been profiling Django to see how much overhead is being added
> > by ORM, and found a very strange case of memory
This isn't something django can help, it has to do with the overallocation
patterns for python dicts. You would see this for any pytho obj with the
right number of fields.
Alex
On Jul 30, 2010 7:17 PM, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:59 PM, OverKrik wrote:
> Hi, I've been
Hi, I am using "mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.1.41, for debian-linux-gnu
(i486) using readline 6.1" on Ubuntu 10.04 but I am not using database
for this tests and not syncdb'ing my models (I know, this sounds
wrong, but after syncdb nothing changes and I was making sure it's not
because of database).
Thx Alex, should I post minimal testapp just to make sure? I really
tried triggering this with my own classes, but had no luck even with
pretty complex ones.
On Jul 31, 3:50 am, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> This isn't something django can help, it has to do with the overallocation
> patterns for python d
"""
class U(models.Model):
name = models.TextField(max_length = 255, blank = False)
name2 = models.TextField(max_length = 255, blank = False)
name3 = models.TextField(max_length = 255, blank = False)
...
data = [U() for x in xrange(10)]
"""
What is this actually trying to test?
23 matches
Mail list logo
